Advertisement

Economic Crisis, Turbulence and the Resilience of Innovation: Insights from the Atlantic Maritime Cluster

  • Hugo PintoEmail author
  • Elvira Uyarra
  • Mercedes Bleda
  • Carla Nogueira
  • Helena Almeida
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

Innovation is related to economic cycles. Often seen as a procyclical phenomenon, many innovation actors try and succeed in maintaining (and even increasing) their innovation efforts to gain competitive advantage during the crises. In this chapter, departing from the recent developments in regional studies, which understand resilience as an evolutionary capacity of socio-economic systems, we suggest the notion of ‘resilience of innovation’ as the capacity of an innovation process to maintain its function at different levels of operation. Drawing upon the results from a survey on knowledge provision and needs of maritime cluster innovative actors in the European Atlantic Area, our analysis focuses on the evolution of innovation and knowledge services. We provide parametric and non-parametric evidence of the differences in the provision and utilisation of these services and provide econometric evidence of the main factors that influence the resilience of innovation at the organizational level.

Keywords

Atlantic area Innovation Knowledge services Maritime cluster Resilience 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This chapter was stimulated by KIMERAA—Knowledge transfer to Improve Marine Economy in Regions from the Atlantic Area, project developed between 2011 and 2014, co-financed by the European cooperation program INTERREG Atlantic Area through the ERDF—European Regional Development Fund. The help of project partners in the data collection is gratefully acknowledged. Carla Nogueira benefits from the financial support from FCT—Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (SFRH/BD/117398/2016). Hugo Pinto also acknowledges the financial support from FCT (SFRH/BPD/84038/2012).

References

  1. Alexander, D. E. (2013). Resilience and disaster risk reduction: An etymological journey. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13(11), 2707–2716.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archibugi, D., Filippetti, A., & Frenz, M. (2013). Economic crisis and innovation: Is destruction prevailing over accumulation? Research Policy, 42(2), 303–314.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asheim, B. T., Coenen, L., Moodysson, J. & Vang, J. (2005). Regional innovation system policy: A knowledge-based approach. Papers in Innovation Studies 2005/13, Lund University, CIRCLE – Center for Innovation, Research and Competences in the Learning Economy.Google Scholar
  4. Asheim, B. T., Smith, H. L., & Oughton, C. (2011). Regional innovation systems: Theory, empirics and policy. Regional Studies, 45(7), 875–891.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.596701 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellini, N. (2003). Business support services: Marketing and the practice of regional innovation policy. Cork: Oak Tree Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bluhm, K., & Schmidt, R. (2008). Change in SMEs – The new European capitalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.  https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227781 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boschma, R. (2015). Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience. Regional Studies, 49(5), 733–751.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.959481 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boschma, R., & Martin, R. (2010). The aims and scope of evolutionary economic geography. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG). Retrieved from http://ideas.repec.org/p/egu/wpaper/1001.html
  10. Cooke, P. (2013). Complex adaptive innovation systems: Relatedness and transversality in the evolving region. Oxford: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooke, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Regional development in the knowledge-based economy: The construction of advantage. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davoudi, S., Shaw, K., Haider, L. J., Quinlan, A. E., Peterson, G. D., Wilkinson, C., et al. (2012). Resilience: A bridging concept or a dead end? “reframing” resilience: Challenges for planning theory and practice interacting traps: Resilience assessment of a pasture management system in Northern Afghanistan urban resilience: What does it mean in Planni. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), 299–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doloreux, D. (2002). What we should know about regional systems of innovation. Technology in Society, 24(3), 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fernández-Esquinas, M., Pinto, H., Yruela, M. P., & Pereira, T. S. (2015). Tracing the flows of knowledge transfer: Latent dimensions and determinants of university–industry interactions in peripheral innovation systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41(5), 685–697.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400601120296 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frenz, M., & Prevezer, M. (2012). What can CIS data tell us about technological regimes and persistence of innovation? Industry and Innovation, 19(4), 285–306.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2012.694676 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gertler, M. S. (2003). Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there). Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1), 75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamdouch, A., & Depret, M. (2012). Mondialisation et résilience des territoires. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.Google Scholar
  19. Hassink, R. (1997). Technology and transfer infrastructures: Some lessons from experiences in Europe, the US and Japan. European Planning Studies, 5, 351–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Howells, J. (2005). Innovation and regional economic development: A matter of perspective? Research Policy, 34(8), 1220–1234.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Makkonen, T. (2013). Government science and technology budgets in times of crisis. Research Policy, 42(3), 817–822.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2015). On the notion of regional economic resilience: Conceptualization and explanation. Journal of Economic Geography, 15, 1–42.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Paunov, C. (2012). The global crisis and firms’ investments in innovation. Research Policy, 41(1), 24–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., et al. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pinto, H., & Fernández-Esquinas, M. (2013). Exploring knowledge-transfer dynamics in a South European region: Breadth, intensity and informality of university-industry interactions in Andalusia: Knowledge commercialization and valorization in regional economic development. In T. Baycan (Ed.), Knowledge commercialization and valorization in regional economic development. Edward Elgar. Retrieved from http://www.elgaronline.com/abstract/9781781004067.00018.xml
  27. Pinto, H., & Pereira, T. S. (2014). Resiliência dos sistemas de inovação face à turbulência económica. Oficina Do CES, 418 Retrieved from http://www.ces.uc.pt/publicacoes/oficina/index.php?id=11157
  28. Pinto, H., Cruz, A. R., & Combe, C. (2015a). Cooperation and the emergence of maritime clusters in the Atlantic: Analysis and implications of innovation and human capital for blue growth. Marine Policy, 57, 167–177.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.03.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pinto, H., Fernandez-Esquinas, M., & Uyarra, E. (2015b). Universities and knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS) as sources of knowledge for innovative firms in peripheral regions. Regional Studies, 49(11), 1873–1891.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.857396 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies, 47(7), 1034–1047.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.748978 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shapira, P., Uyarra, E., Youtie, J., Cox, D., Gok, A., Rogers, J., et al. (2015). Institutions for Technology Diffusion, USA. Inter-American Development Bank, Competitiveness and Innovation Division. Report No. IDB-TN-832.Google Scholar
  32. Simmie, J. (2014). Regional economic resilience: A Schumpeterian perspective. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 72(2), 103–116.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-014-0274-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Simmie, J., & Martin, R. L. (2010). The economic resilience of regions: Towards an evolutionary approach. Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society, 3, 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Skålholt, A., & Thune, T. (2013). Coping with economic crises—The role of clusters. European Planning Studies, 22(10), 1993–2010.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.813909 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Teixeira, A. C., Santos, P., & Oliveira Brochado, A. (2008). International R&D cooperation between low-tech SMEs: The role of cultural and geographical proximity. European Planning Studies, 16(6), 785–810.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310802079411 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Research Policy, 34(8), 1203–1219.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Torre, A., & Rallet, A. (2005). Proximity and localization. Regional Studies, 39(1), 47–59.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320842 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Uyarra, E., & Flanagan, K. (2012). Reframing regional innovation systems: Evolution, complexity and public policy. In P. Cooke (Ed.), Re-framing regional development (pp. 146–163). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Zeng, S. X., Xie, X. M., & Tam, C. M. (2010). Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs. Technovation, 30(3), 181–194.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hugo Pinto
    • 1
    • 4
    • 5
    Email author
  • Elvira Uyarra
    • 2
  • Mercedes Bleda
    • 3
  • Carla Nogueira
    • 4
  • Helena Almeida
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Centre for Social StudiesUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
  2. 2.Manchester Institute of Innovation Research (MIoIR), Alliance Manchester Business SchoolManchesterUK
  3. 3.Manchester Institute of Innovation Research (MIoIR), Alliance Manchester Business School, University of ManchesterManchesterUK
  4. 4.CIEO – Research Centre for Spatial and Organizational DynamicsUniversity of AlgarveFaroPortugal
  5. 5.Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of AlgarveFaroPortugal

Personalised recommendations