Innovative Urban Paradigms for Sustainability and Resilience

  • Manuela Pires RosaEmail author
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)


Sustainability and resilience perspectives are proclaiming the need of a New Economy, a New Urbanism and a New Mobility. These advances imply deep changes in urban paradigms, namely in the scientific areas of land use, transportation and water planning and management. One requires changes of substantive tenor which consider demand management measures which aim at managing (reduce or reorganize) certain needs (water, energy, new urban space), instead of just satisfying them. These innovated approaches will contribute to reduce the vulnerability of the territories, to conserve natural resources and to avoid environmental pollution. Urban management must contribute to the protection of the atmosphere in the regional and world scales, taking into account, in a complementary way, to the contribution of ecosystems services. The need of reducing the dependence of non-renewable resources is stressed which is one of the requirements to have a climate stability. Disaster risk reduction must be part of urban design and strategies to achieve sustainability and resilience. In these holistic approaches, it is fundamental to develop collaborative and adaptive processes.


Sustainability Resilience New urbanism Urban management 



Author would like to express her thanks to European Commission Directorate-General for Climate Action and Praise Worthy Prize which granted permissions for the reprinting of information.


  1. Adger, W., Hughes, T., Folke, C., Carpenter, S., & Rockström, J. (2005). Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science, 309, 1036–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansel, W. (2011). Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse Dachbegrünung, Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt (DBU), Projekt-Nr. 28269–23. Nürtingen: Abschlussbericht.Google Scholar
  3. Blake, H. (2013). The treasury’s higher living standards framework: Update on the sustainability dimension. Proceedings of the paper presented at the sustainability Rhetoric: Facts and fictions.Google Scholar
  4. Broaddus, A., Litman, T., & Menon, G. (2009). Transportation demand management: Training document. Eschborn: GTZ.Google Scholar
  5. Bruneau, M., Chang, S., Eguchi, R., Lee, G., O’Rourke, T., Reinhorn, A., et al. (2003). A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra, 19, 733–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bulkeley, H. (2013). Cities and climate change. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cascio, J. (2009, April). The next big thing: Resilience. Foreign Policy. Accessed July 10, 2016, from
  8. Costanza, R. (1997). La economía ecológica de la sostenibilidad. Invertir en capital natural. In R. Goodland, H. Daly, S. El Serafy, & B. Von Droste (Eds.), Medio Ambiente y Desenrollo Sostenible – Más allá del Informe Brundtland. Madrid: Editorial Trotta.Google Scholar
  9. Daly, H. (1990). Commentary: Toward some operational principles of sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 2, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davidse, B. J., Othengrafen, M., & Deppisch, S. (2015, April). Spatial planning practices of adapting to climate change. European Journal of Spatial Development, 57. Accessed September 1, 2016, from articles/refereed57.pdf
  11. Ekelund, N. (2007). Adapting to climate change in Stockholm. Stockholm’s action programme on climate change. Stockholm: Stockholm Stad (City of Stockholm).Google Scholar
  12. Ellen Macarthur Foundation. (2015). Towards the circular economy. Business rationale for an accelerated transition. Accessed September 24, 2017, from
  13. European Commission. (2007). Green paper on adapting to climate change in Europe - options for EU action. COM (2007) 354 final.Google Scholar
  14. European Commission. (2009). White paper: Adapting to climate change: Towards a European framework for action. COM(2009) 147 final.Google Scholar
  15. European Commission. (2010a). Stockholm – European Green Capital 2010. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, European Commission. ISBN: 978-92-79-15064-7.Google Scholar
  16. European Commission. (2010b). Hamburg – European Green Capital 2011. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, European Commission. ISBN: 978-92-79-19009-4.Google Scholar
  17. European Commission. (2013). An EU strategy on adaptation to climate change. Communication COM(2013) 216 final.Google Scholar
  18. Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analysis. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fulford, C. (1996). The compact city and the market. In M. Jenks, E. Burton, & K. Williams (Eds.), The compact city: A sustainable urban form? (pp. 122–133). London: E&FN Spon Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Goodland, R., & Daly, H. (1996). Environmental sustainability: Universal and non-negotiable. Ecological Applications, 6, 1002–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heras, B. P. (2015). Adaptation to climate change in the European Union: Between supranational action and state reluctance. Iucn Academy of Environmental Law EJournal, 6, 1–21. Accessed September 12, 2016, from Google Scholar
  22. Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jiménez, N., & Martínez-Gil, J. (2005). The new culture of water in Spain: A philosophy towards a sustainable development. E-WAter Official Publication of the European Water Association, 7, 1–20. Accessed in September 12, 2016, from Google Scholar
  24. Leeuw, S., & Aschan-Leygonie, C. (2000, May 22–26). A long-term perspective on resilience in socio-natural systems. Workshop System shocks – System resilience Abisko. Sweden. Accessed June 24, 2017, from
  25. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN: 1-59726-040-1.Google Scholar
  26. Moral, L., & Saurí, D. (1999). Changing course: Water policy in Spain. Environment, 41(6), 12–36.Google Scholar
  27. Nelson, D. C. (Ed.). (2000). Intelligent transportation primer (pp. 10–11). Washington, DC: Institute of Transportation Engineers. ISBN: 0-935403-45-0.Google Scholar
  28. OECD. (1997). Towards sustainable transportation. In Proceedings of the international conference. Organized by the organisation for economic co-operation and development and hosted by the government of Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, 24–27 March 1996, Environment Directorate. Paris: OCDE.Google Scholar
  29. Olsson, P., Galaz, V., & Boonstra, W. J. (2014). Sustainability transformations: A resilience perspective. Ecology and Society, 19(4), 1. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Owens, S. (1995). From “predict and provide” to “predict and prevent”? Pricing and planning in transport policy. Transport Policy, 2(1), 43–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Paton, L. D., Mamula-Seadon, L., & Selway, K. (2013). Community resilience in Christchurch: Adaptive responses and capacities during earthquake recovery. GNS science report 37. lower Hutt: GNS science.Google Scholar
  32. Restemeyer, B., Woltjer, J., & van den Brink, M. (2015). A strategy-based framework for assessing the flood resilience of cities: A Hamburg case study. Planning Theory & Practice, 16(1), 45–62. Accessed September 12, 2016, from CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ricardo-AEA. (2013). Adaptation strategies for European cities. Final report. ©European Union. Report prepared for the European Commission Directorate-General for Climate Action.Google Scholar
  34. Rosa, M. P. (2013). Implications of complexity and sustainability in civil engineering. International Review of Civil Engineering, 4(1), 55–61.Google Scholar
  35. Rosa, M. P. (2014). Integrated vision for sustainable and innovative industrial areas. In M. Cavallo, K. Konstantinou, & C. Makrakis-karachalios (Eds.), Marketing theory and governing innovative industrial areas integrated guidelines – A handbook, MER project – marketing theory and governing innovative industrial areas (2013–2014). Accessed September 24, 2017, from ISBN ebook 978-618-81809-0-1.
  36. Rupprecht Consult. (2014). Guidelines: Development and implementing a sustainable urban mobility plan. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  37. Sachs, I. (1993). Estratégias de Transição para o Século XXI. Para Pensar o Desenvolvimento Sustentável. São Paulo: Nobel. ISBN: 8585445112.Google Scholar
  38. Saunders, W., & Becker, J. (2015). A discussion of resilience and sustainability: Land use planning recovery from the Canterbury earthquake sequence, New Zealand. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 14, 73–81. Accessed July 2, 2016, from CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Serageldin, I. (1993). Making development sustainable. Finance and Development, 30, 6–10.Google Scholar
  40. Stephen, S., Simms, A., Neitzert, E., & Ryan-Collins, J. (2010). The great transition. London: New Economics Foundation. ISBN: 9781904882633.Google Scholar
  41. Vitousek, P., Mooney, H., Lubchenco, J., & Melillo, J. (1997). Human domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science, 277, 494–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vivier, J., Pourbaix, J., & Mezghani, M. (2005). Mobility in cities – Database. Brussels: International Association of Public Transport.Google Scholar
  43. Walker, B., Holling, C., Carpenter, S., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 5. Accessed September 2, 2017, from
  44. WCED. (1987). Our common future. In G. H. Brundtland (Ed.), Report of the world commission on environment and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Centre for Spatial and Organizational Dynamics—CIEOUniversity of AlgarveFaroPortugal

Personalised recommendations