Advertisement

Openness in the Global Network

  • Caroline S. Wagner
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Advances in the Economics of Innovation and Technology book series (PAEIT)

Abstract

This chapter presents the dynamics at the team level associated with collaboration and networked structures. Investment in science and technology is shifting. As it does, the structure of collaborative teaming is changing, too. This chapter describes the emerging landscape of collaboration for the individual and the team.

References

  1. Ahmadpoor, M., & Jones, B. F. (2017). The Dual Frontier: Patented Inventions and Prior Scientific Advance. Science, 357(6351), 583–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, R. C. (1983). Collective Invention. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 4(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benkler, Y. (2004). Sharing Nicely: On Shareable Goods and the Emergence of Sharing as a Modality of Economic Production. Yale Law Journal, 114, 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crane, D. (1972). Invisible Colleges; Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. de Solla Price, D. J. (1963). Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Doudna, J. A., & Sternberg, S. H. (2017). A Crack in Creation: Gene Editing and the Unthinkable Power to Control Evolution. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  7. Dunbar, R. I. (1992). Neocortex Size as a Constraint on Group Size in Primates. Journal of Human Evolution, 22(6), 469–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lemley, M. A. (2016). The Surprising Resilience of the Patent System. Texas Law Review, 95, 1.Google Scholar
  9. Mancini, A. (2006). International Patent Law Is Obsolete. New York: Buenos Books America LLC.Google Scholar
  10. Powell, W. W., White, D. R., Owen-Smith, J., & Koput, K. W. (2005). Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences 1. World, 110(4), 1132–1205.Google Scholar
  11. Raynaud, D. (2010). Why Do Diffusion Data Not Fit the Logistic Model? A Note on Network Discreteness, Heterogeneity and Anisotropy. In From Sociology to Computing in Social Networks (pp. 215–230). Vienna: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  13. Science-Metrix. (2018). Analytical Support for Bibliometrics Indicators: Open Access Availability of Scientific Publications. http://www.science-metrix.com/sites/default/files/science-metrix/publications/science-metrix_open_access_availability_scientific_publications_report.pdf. Accessed July 2018.
  14. Simon, H. (1947). Administrative Behavior. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
  15. Von Hippel, E. (1994). “Sticky Information” and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation. Management Science, 40(4), 429–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caroline S. Wagner
    • 1
  1. 1.Glenn College of Public AffairsThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations