Advertisement

Streets as Factors for and Barriers to Cities in Sustaining Development: A Comparison of Gothenburg and Gdansk

  • Grazyna Chaberek-KarwackaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

Cities are places where different stakeholders try to reach their own goals. The implementation of these goals is primarily focused on the streets in the community. However, streets are also the places where most problems arise within the urban space: congestion, air pollution, noise, and danger to society health and life. The new approach in city urbanism promotes multi-functional and multi-generational space, preserving history and the unique character of each city at the same time, and making sure a revitalized space is available within safe and comfortable walking distance. Unfortunately, planners and investors forget about those obvious demands. In emerging cities and metropolises, new investments usually focus on the expansion of transport infrastructure; unfortunately do not consider other needs of citizens. That limits the possibilities for sustainable development of the cities over the long term. The aim of this study is to analyze urban-street structures and to identify those which are conducive to the reconciliation of different stakeholders’ goals and those which are not able to fulfill such needs. The analysis is based on the comparison of two examples from Baltic Region countries: the city of developed society in Gothenburg in Sweden and the emerging city of Gdansk in Poland. Streets used for comparison have similar functions and meaning in the urban tissue of both cities. Analysis showed the characteristics of the streets, which are supposed to be factors or barriers for cities to sustain development according to the new approach to developing urban guidelines.

Keywords

City-system structure Streets functions Sustain development New urbanism Soft city 

References

  1. Andersson M (2016) Gothenburg. Paper presented at the VREF conference on urban freight 2016: plan for the future—sharing urban space, Chalmers, Gothenburg, 17–19 Oct 2016Google Scholar
  2. Delura M, Krawczyk A (2013) Skwer sportowcow miejskich, interview with Gadek Grzegorz. Miasta. Starszemiasto 2(3):18–23Google Scholar
  3. Felixa MN, Mohareb N (2017) Affordable and common modes of transportation in developing cities and their effect on the sustainability of streets. Paper presented at the international conference—green urbanism, GU-2016, Cornell University, Rome, 12–14 Oct 2016Google Scholar
  4. Gehl J (2010) Cities for people. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  5. Gdansk w Liczbach (2016) Portal Miasta Gdanska. http://www.gdansk.pl/biznes/Gdansk-w-liczbach,a,33608. Accessed 2 Dec 2016
  6. Majer A (2014) Odrodzenie miast. Uniwersytetu Lodzkiego, Wyd. Naukowe Scholar, Lodz-Warszawa, WydGoogle Scholar
  7. Molenaar C (2015) Why customers would rather have a smartphone than a car. In: Relationship retailing as an opportunity. Gower, FarnhamGoogle Scholar
  8. National Association of City Transportation Officials (2013) Urban street design guide. Island Press, New Orleans, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  9. Pham TTH, Appariciob P, Landryc S et al (2017) Disentangling the effects of urban form and socio-demographic context on street tree cover: a multi-level analysis from Montréal. Landscape and Urban Planning 157:422–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Purwanto E, Darmawan E (2014) The transformation of street space into public space: developing a sense of place, people, creativity, and street vitality. Int J Civic Polit Comm Stud 13(1):23–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rahman NA, Sakip SRM, Nayan NM (2016) Physical qualities and activities for a user-friendly shopping street in the context of a Malaysian City. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 222:196–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ribeiro P (2016) A new perspective on street classification towards sustainability. In: Recent researches in environment, energy systems and sustainability. http://www.wseas.us/e-library/conferences/2012/Algarve/EEESD/EEESD-43.pdf. Accessed 29 Dec 2016
  13. Road Task Force (2013) The vision and direction for London’s streets and roads. Executive summary. https://tfl.gov.uk/roadstaskforce. Accessed 10 Dec 2016
  14. Speck J (2016) The simplest way to avoid bad street design: copy the ones that work. The Atlantic Citylab. http://www.citylab.com/cityfixer/2016/04/street-design-models/479343/. Accessed 22 Apr 2016
  15. Strohmeier F (2016) Barriers and their influence on the mobility behavior of elder pedestrians in urban areas: challenges and best practice for walkability in the city of Vienna. Transp Res Procedia 14:1134–1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Suzuki H, Dastur A, Moffatt S et al (2010) Eco2 cities. In: Ecological cities as economic cities. The World Bank, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  17. Szołtysek J (2011) Kreowanie mobilności mieszkancow miast. Wolters Kluwer Polska, WarszawaGoogle Scholar
  18. United Nations (2016) General Assembly Distr. draft outcome document of the United Nations habitat III—conference on housing and sustainable urban development. A/CONF.226/4. United Nations. http://nua.unhabitat.org/uploads/DraftOutcomeDocumentofHabitatIII_en.pdf. Accessed 29 Sept 2016
  19. Zakowska M (2013) Zycie publiczne, interview with L. Gemzoe Miasta Transport 2(4):13–16Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of GdanskGdanskPoland

Personalised recommendations