Advertisement

Building Resilient Landscapes and Green Cities Along the Coast and in the Upland of Vietnam

  • An Thinh Nguyen
  • Luc Hens
Chapter
Part of the Springer Climate book series (SPCL)

Abstract

This concluding chapter aims at integrating the data of the previous chapters. It starts from the observation that the reviewed and original data from the core chapters provides a multitude of research facts on Vietnam which leave few of any doubt on climate change associated effects such as storms, inundations, coastal erosion, and their significant impacts on the nature and the affected human populations. Two main recommendations are provided. Firstly, rethink cities and communes in a context of sustainability and green and smart organizations. Adopt an integration approach targeting not only sufficient accessible green but also, among others, carbon neutrality, zero waste, sustainable mobility, an urban economy with opportunities for well-being, and an inclusive and safe social network. Use smart solutions for these ambitious targets. Secondly, strengthen in Vietnam a provincial and communal “disaster policy” which is aligned with the comprehensive national climate change policy.

The chapter concludes by focusing on the uncertainties associated with the research results in this book, among others about the cost of the damage caused by extreme weather conditions.

Keywords

Policy implications Risk Resilient landscape Green city Coastal protection Sustainable land use National challenges 

References

  1. Abule, E., Snyman, H. A., & Smit, G. N. (2005). Comparisons of pastoralists perceptions about rangeland resource utilization in the Middle Awash Valley of Ethiopia. Environmental Management, 75, 21–35.Google Scholar
  2. Adger, W. N. (1999). Social vulnerability to climate change and extremes in coastal Vietnam. World Development, 27(2), 249–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adger, W. N., Huq, S., Brown, K., Conway, D., & Hulme, M. (2003). Adaptation to climate change in the developing world. Progress in Development Studies, 3(3), 179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adger, W. N., Barnett, J., Brown, K., Marshall, N., & O'Brien, K. (2013a). Cultural dimensions of climate change impacts and adaptation. Nature Climate Change, 3, 112–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Adger, W. N., Quinn, T., Lorenzoni, I., Murphy, C., & Sweeney, J. (2013b). Changing social contracts in climate-change adaptation. Nature Climate Change, 3, 330–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ballantyne, R., Hughes, K., & Bond, N. (2016). Using a Delphi approach to identify managers’ preferences for visitor interpretation at Canterbury Cathedral World Heritage Site. Tourism Management, 54, 72–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnett, J., & Adger, W. N. (2007). Climate change, human security and violent conflict. Political Geography, 26(6), 639–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernatchez, P., & Fraser, P. (2012). Evolution of coastal defence structures and consequences for beach width trends, Québec, Canada. Coastal Research, 28(6), 1550–1566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Soir, E., Zech, E., Alisic, E., Versporten, A., Van Oyen, H., Kleber, R., van der Hart, O., & Mylle, J. (2014). Children following the Ghislenghien gas explosion: PTSD predictors and risk factors. Journal of Child Adolescent Trauma, 10, 189–200.Google Scholar
  10. Dijkman, J. (2007). A Dutch perspective on coastal Louisiana flood risk reduction and landscape stabilization. Final Report. Netherlands Water Partnership, Netherlands. London, England, p. 279.Google Scholar
  11. Dilley, M., & Heyman, B. N. (1995). ENSO and disaster: Droughts, floods and El Nino southern oscillation warm events. Disasters, 19(3), 181–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Folving, R., & Christensen, H. (2007). Farming system changes in the Vietnamese uplands - using fallow length and farmers’ adoption of Sloping Agricultural Land Technologies as indicators of environmental sustainability. Geografisk Tidskrift, 107(1), 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gray, L. C., & Morant, P. (2003). Reconciling indigenous knowledge with scientific assessment of soil fertility changes in southwestern Burkina Faso. Geoderma, 111, 425–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gupta, U. G., & Clarke, R. E. (1996). Theory and applications of the Delphi technique: A bibliography (1975–1994). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 53, 185–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hartley, J. (2014). Some thoughts on Likert-type scales. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 14(1), 83–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hasson, F., Keeney, S., & McKenna, H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 1008–1015.Google Scholar
  17. Hsu, C. C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation, 12(10), 1–8.Google Scholar
  18. Hurni, H. (2000). Assessing sustainable land management (SLM). Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 81(2), 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Le, D. Q., & Tuan, H. D. (2004). Improving indigenous technologies for sustainable land use in northern mountainous areas of Vietnam. Mountain Science, 1(3), 270–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Le, T. H., Nguyen, A. T., Tran, A. T., Dao, D. C., Luu, T. A., Hoang, L. T. T., Nguyen, M. H., Tran, Q. B., Le, V. H., Uong, D. K., Bui, T. M., Tong, P. T., Hoang, H., & Truong, Q. H. (2015). Impacts of climate change on agro-ecological landscapes in the coastal area of the Thai Binh province (Vietnam) using the Delphi technique. Climate Change Strategies and Management, 7(2), 222–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (2002). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Addison-Wesley Publisher, 620 pages.Google Scholar
  22. Lucarelli, M., & Roe, P. G. (Eds.). (2012). Green Oslo. Visions, planning and discourse. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  23. Lund, S., Banta, G. T., & Bunting, S. W. (2014). Applying stakeholder Delphi techniques for planning sustainable use of aquatic resources: Experiences from upland China, India and Vietnam. Sustainability of Water Quality and Ecology, 3–4, 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Misbahuzzaman, K. (2016). Traditional farming in the mountainous region of Bangladesh and its modifications. Mountain Science, 13(8), 1489–1502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moges, A., & Holden, N. M. (2007). Farmers’ perceptions of soil erosion and soil fertility loss in Southern Ethiopia. Land Degradation & Development, 18, 543–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. MONRE (Vietnamese Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment). (2016). Climate change and sea level rise scenarios for Vietnam. Vietnam, 170 pages.Google Scholar
  27. Mukherjee, N., Hugé, J., Sutherland, W. J., McNeill, J., Van Opstal, M., Dahdouh-Guebas, F., & Koedam, N. (2015). The Delphi technique in ecology and biological conservation: Applications and guidelines. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 6, 1097–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Neirotti, P., De Marco, A., Cagliano, A. C., Mangano, G., & Scorrano, F. (2014). Current trends in smart city initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities, 38, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nguyen, V. T., Dang, T. L., Nguyen, A. T., Tran, D. L., & Hens, L. (2017). Shifting challenges for coastal green cities. Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences, 39(2), 109–129.Google Scholar
  30. Nguyen, A. T., Nguyen, N. T., Luong, T. T., & Hens, L. (2018). Tourism and beach erosion: Valuing the damage of beach erosion for tourism in the Hoi An World Heritage site, Vietnam. Environment, Development and Sustainability https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0126-y
  31. Njoroge, J. M. (2014). An enhanced framework for regional tourism sustainable adaptation to climate change. Tourism Management Perspectives, 12, 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Quang, D. V., Schreinemachers, P., & Berger, T. (2014). Ex-ante assessment of soil conservation methods in the uplands of Vietnam: An agent-based modeling approach. Agricultural Systems, 123, 108–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reed, M. S., Dougill, A. J., & Taylor, M. J. (2007). Integrating local and scientific knowledge for adaptationto land degradation: Kalahari rangeland management options. Land Degradation & Development, 18, 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rerkasem, K., Yimyam, N., & Rerkasem, B. (2009). Land use transformation in the mountainous mainland Southeast Asia region and the role of indigenous knowledge and skills in forest management. Forest Ecology and Management, 31, 25–36.Google Scholar
  35. Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis. Forecast, 15(4), 353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shreve, C. M., & Kelman, I. (2014). Does mitigation save? Reviewing cost-benefit analyses of disaster risk reduction. Disaster Risk Reduction, 10, 213–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Styger, E., Rakotondramasy, H. M., Pfeffer, M. J., Fernandes, E. C. M., & Bates, D. M. (2007). Influence of slash-and- burn farming practices on fallow succession and land degradation in the rainforest region of Madagascar. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 119, 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Subedi, M., Hocking, T. J., Fullen, M. A., Mccrea, A. R., Milne, E., Wu, B.-Z., & Mitchell, D. J. (2009). Use of farmers’ indicators to evaluate the sustainability of cropping systems on sloping land in Yunnan Province, China. Pedosphere, 19(3), 344–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tran, D. L., Hens, L., Cao, T. T. T., & Do, T. T. H. (2014). Environmental management of seaports in Vietnam (p. 316). Hanoi: Publishing House for Science and Technology.Google Scholar
  40. Tran, H. T., Tran, P., Hawley, K., Khan, F., & Moenc, M. (2015). Quantitative cost-benefit analysis for typhoon resilient housing in Danang city, Vietnam. Urban Climate, 12, 85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. UN-Habitat. (2009). Planning sustainable cities: global report on human settlements 2009 by United Nations Human Settlements Programme. Earthscan/UN-Habitat, London, 2009. No. of pages: xxx + 306. ISBN 978–1–84407-899-8.Google Scholar
  42. WB (World Bank). (2010). Natural hazards, unnatural disasters: The economics of effective protection. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications, 276 pages.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilks, A. R. (2013). Preliminary cost benefit analysis of storm surge hazard prevention in the Tuamotu Islands, French Polynesia. SPCSOPAC Technical Report. Natural Resources Economics Section, Ocean and Islands Programme. ISBN 978-982-000643-0.Google Scholar
  44. Zolingen, S. J., & Klaassen, C. A. (2003). Selection processes in a Delphi study about key qualifications in senior secondary vocational education. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 70, 317–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zurayk, R., Awar, F., Hamadeh, S., Talhouk, S., Sayegh, C., Chehab, A. G., & Shab, K. (2001). Using indigenous knowledge in land use investigations: A participatory study in a semi-arid mountainous region of Lebanon. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 86, 247–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • An Thinh Nguyen
    • 1
  • Luc Hens
    • 2
  1. 1.Research Institute for Resources and Climate ChangeHanoi University of Natural Resources and EnvironmentHanoiVietnam
  2. 2.Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek (VITO)BrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations