Advertisement

Comparing Local and Immigrant Household Preparedness for Natural Hazards in the Van Chan Mountain

  • An Thinh Nguyen
  • Luc Hens
Chapter
Part of the Springer Climate book series (SPCL)

Abstract

Vulnerable groups are affected more by extreme weather as compared to the population on average. In the Vietnamese mountains, the ethnic minorities, as the Tay, Thai, Hmong, and Kinh, are definitely among the most vulnerable groups in the country: they are poor and live on minimal resources stemming from traditional agriculture (tea, rice, and vegetables). The human ecological characteristics of these groups are poorly described in the literature.

This chapter aims at identifying which natural hazards these populations perceive as threatening and how to adapt to them. A major aspect of the discussion relates to the changing LULC in the area.

The chapter takes off with a description of the LULC changes on the Van Chan mountain. Villages and agriculture occupy gradually but deliberately more land, while deforestation goes on. The four main ethnic minorities (Tay, Thai, Hmong, and Kinh) living in this area are described in their human ecological context. A two-round Delphi-inspired analysis in which representatives of these four ethnicities took part allows identifying the most important natural calamities as floods and landslides, together with the prioritization of their impacts. The research equally allowed inventorying the adaptation actions already undertaken by the local inhabitants.

Keywords

Preparedness Village-scapes Delphi survey Local experience and responses Statement statistics Van Chan mountain 

References

  1. Armenteras, D., Espelta, J. M., Rodríguez, N., & Retana, J. (2017). Deforestation dynamics and drivers in different forest types in Latin America: Three decades of studies (1980–2010). Global Environmental Change, 46, 139–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dohong, A., Aziz, A. A., & Dargusch, P. (2017). A review of the drivers of tropical peatland degradation in South-East Asia. Land Use Policy, 69, 349–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Khuc, Q. V., Tran, B. Q., Meyfroidt, P., & Paschke, M. W. (2018). Drivers of deforestation and forest degradation in Vietnam: An exploratory analysis at the national level. Forest Policy and Economics, 90, 128–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. SGG (Suoi Giang Government). (2016). Annual report for socio-economic development in 2015–2016 of Suoi Giang commune. Official reports. Yen Bai province: Vietnam, 25 pages (in Vietnamese).Google Scholar
  5. STG (Son Thinh Government). (2016). Annual report for socio-economic development in 2015–2016 of Son Thinh commune. Official reports. Yen Bai province: Vietnam, 20 pages (in Vietnamese).Google Scholar
  6. Subedi, M., Matthews, R. B., Pogson, M., Abegaz, A., Balana, B. B., Oyesiku-Blakemore, J., & Smith, J. (2014). Can biogas digesters help to reduce deforestation in Africa? Biomass and Bioenergy, 70, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. TBLG (Thuong Bang La Government). (2016). Annual report for socio-economic development in 2015–2016 of Thuong Bang La commune. Official reports. Yen Bai province: Vietnam, 14 pages (in Vietnamese).Google Scholar
  8. TPG (Tran Phu Government). (2016). Annual report for socio-economic development in 2015–2016 of Tran Phu town. Official reports. Vietnam: Yen Bai province, 23 pages (in Vietnamese).Google Scholar
  9. VCG (Van Chan Government). (2012). Report on natural hazard prevention 2011. Yen Bai, 12 pages (in Vietnameses).Google Scholar
  10. VCG (Van Chan Government). (2016b). Van Chan Statistic year book 2015. Yen Bai, 350 pages (in Vietnamese).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • An Thinh Nguyen
    • 1
  • Luc Hens
    • 2
  1. 1.Research Institute for Resources and Climate ChangeHanoi University of Natural Resources and EnvironmentHanoiVietnam
  2. 2.Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek (VITO)BrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations