Making Automation Work for Cities: Impacts and Policy Responses
There seems to be great concern and perhaps even greater uncertainty about how autonomous vehicles (AV) in cities may possibly affect not only mobility and transport but also infrastructure, land use, and the natural environment. Along with the debate on the impacts of AV the question arises what urban and transport planning strategies will be needed to ensure that the transition towards a fully automated transport in urban areas will contribute in the best possible way to urban sustainability goals and make it compatible with existing key urban policies. This paper addresses the question: What do city planners and policy makers have to know about the technology, its impacts and how can they prepare? It reviews the status of planning and implementing automation in cities and metropolitan areas in the US and in Europe. The paper draws on the presentations, discussions and conclusions from a breakout session ‘Making automation work for cities’ at the Automated Vehicle Symposium in July 2017.
KeywordsAutonomous vehicles Urban planning Cities Transport Land use Strategies
We would like to extend all presenting participants in the Breakout Session ‘Making Automation Work for Cities’ at the AVS 2017 in San Francisco, namely: Kristopher Carter (City of Boston, Mayor’s Office of New Urban Mechanics), Tilly Chang (San Francisco County Transportation Authority), Gert Blom (City of Helmond), Brian Matthews (Milton Keynes), David Murphy (Waste Management Inc.), Martin Russ (Austriatech), Mollie Pelon (National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO)) and Jiaqi Ma (Leidos).
- 1.Beiker S (2016) Deployment scenarios for vehicles with higher-order automation. In: Maurer M, Gerdes JC, Lenz B, Winner H (eds) Technical, legal and social aspects. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden, pp 193–211Google Scholar
- 2.ERTRAC—European Road Transport Research Advisory Council (2015) Automated driving roadmap. ERTRAC, Brussels. http://www.ertrac.org/uploads/documentsearch/id38/ERTRAC_Automated-Driving-2015.pdf. Accessed 4 Dec 2017
- 3.VDA, Automatisierung (2015) Von Fahrassistenzsystemen zum autonomen Fahren. Verband der Automobilindustrie e. V. (VDA)Google Scholar
- 4.European Technology Platform on Smart Systems Integration (2015) European roadmap smart systems for automated driving. Berlin, Germany. http://www.smart-systems-integration.org/public/documents/publications/EPoSS%20Roadmap_Smart%20Systems%20for%20Automated%20Driving_V2_April%202015.pdf. Accessed 11 Dec 2017
- 5.Strategy & PwC (2015) Connected car studyGoogle Scholar
- 6.Smith S, Bellone J, Bransfield S, Ingles A, Noel G, Reed E, Yanagisawa M (2015) Benefits estimation framework for automated vehicle operations (No. FHWA-JPO-16-229)Google Scholar
- 7.Milakis D, van Arem B, van Wee B (2017) Policy and society related implications of automated driving: a review of literature and directions for future research. J Intell Transp Syst 1–25Google Scholar
- 8.Innamaa S, Smith S, Wilmink I, Reed N (2017) Impact assessment. In: Meyer G, Beiker S (eds) Road vehicle automation, 4th edn. Springer International Publishing, ChamGoogle Scholar
- 9.Smith S, Innamaa S, Barnard Y, Gellerman H, Horiguchi R, Rakoff H (2017) Where will automated vehicles take us? A framework for impact assessment. Poster presented at the automated vehicles symposium, San Francisco. https://higherlogicdownload.s3.amazonaws.com/AUVSI/14c12c18-fde1-4c1d-8548-035ad166c766/UploadedImages/2017/PDFs/Proceedings/Posters/Wednesday_Poster%202.pdf
- 11.National Association of City Transportation Officials—NACTO (2017) Blueprint for autonomous urbanism. Module 1Google Scholar