Roots and Fruits of Population Growth and Social Structures: Demographic and Sociological Vistas

  • Jon AnsonEmail author
  • Walter Bartl
  • Andrzej Kulczycki


World population, currently approaching 7.5 billion, will probably exceed 11 billion by the end of the century, almost double what it was at turn of the present century. The growth is uneven, and the result is a redistribution of the world’s population: at the end of this century Europe will have essentially no more people than it had fifty years ago, whereas Africa’s population will have multiplied 20-fold, and will have gone up from under 10% to over 30% of the world’s population. Thus, not only is population growing but it is currently growing in those regions of the world that have the least resources at their disposal, and the result is liable to be a dramatic rise in world inequality; increased conflict over access to resources; and increased migratory pressure from the poor to the richer regions of the world. In this introductory chapter, we discuss the history and sources of growth in world population over the past two centuries (in particular mortality and fertility) and its eventual stabilisation. We consider some of the major links between population and social dynamics in the light of two basic approaches to world population growth: The Malthusian approach, which views growth as a catastrophe, and the Marxian approach, which sees both population growth and its outcomes as contingent on social conditions and responses. We focus on the mutual relationship between population and societal change at all levels, the micro-, the meso- and the macro-levels, a relationship that is also reflected in the papers in this collection. However, there is also agency in population growth and the introduction concludes with a consideration of the options which humanity faces given the anticipated growth of world population and its redistribution.


World population Population growth Social inequality Malthus Marx Social demography 


  1. Abel, G. J., Barakat, B., Samir, K. C., & Lutz, W. (2016). Meeting the Sustainable Development Goals leads to lower world population growth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(50), 14294–14299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armijo, L. E. (2007). The BRICs countries (Brazil, Russia, India, and China) as analytical category: Mirage or insight? Asian Perspective, 31(4), 7–42.Google Scholar
  3. Armstrong, S. (2017). The new poverty. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Barlösius, E. (2007). Die Demographisierung des Gesellschaftlichen. Zur Bedeutung der Repräsentationspraxis [The demographisation of the social. On the relevance of representational practices]. In E. Barlösius & D. Schiek (Eds.), Die, Demographisierung des Gesellschaftlichen: Analysen und Debatten zur demographischen Zukunft Deutschlands (pp. 9–36). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartl, W., & Sackmann, R. (2016). Governance indicators and responsiveness to population decline: School closures in practice and discourse in Saxony-Anhalt. Comparative Population Studies, 41(3–4), 321–358. Scholar
  6. Bauman, Z. (1989). Modernity and the Holocaust. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bennett, L. (2017). Deforestation and climate change. Washington, DC: Climate Institute.Google Scholar
  8. Bloom, D. E., Kuhn, M., & Prettner, K. (2017). Africa’s prospects for enjoying a demographic dividend. Journal of Demographic Economics, 83(1), 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bloom, D. E., & Williamson, J. G. (1998). Demographic transitions and economic miracles in emerging Asia. The World Bank Economic Review, 12(3), 419–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boatcă, M. (2016). Global inequalities beyond occidentalism. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine domination. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Brandmeir, K., Grimm, M., Heise, M., & Holzhausen A. (2017). Allianz global wealth report 2017. Munich. Accessed 24 June 2018.
  13. Bucher, H., & Mai, R. (2005). Depopulation and its consequences for the regions of Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  14. Buhaug, H., & Urdal, H. (2013). An urbanization bomb? Population growth and social disorder in cities. Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 1–10. Scholar
  15. Casterline, J. B., & Bongaarts, J. (Eds.). (2017). Fertility transition in Sub-Saharan Africa (Population and Development Review, Supplement, Vol. 43). New York: Population Council.Google Scholar
  16. Chesnais, J.-C. (1992). The demographic transition: Stages, patterns, and economic implications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Chetty, R., Grusky, D., Hell, M., Hendren, N., Manduca, R., & Narang, J. (2017). The fading American dream: Trends in absolute income mobility since 1940. Science, 356(6336), 398–406. Scholar
  18. Chola, L., McGee, S., Tugendhaft, A., Buchmann, E., & Hofman, K. (2015). Scaling up family planning to reduce maternal and child mortality: The potential costs and benefits of modern contraceptive use in South Africa. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0130077. Scholar
  19. Coale, A. J., & Watkins, S. C. (Eds.). (1986). The decline of fertility in Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Coleman, D. (2006). Immigration and ethnic change in low-fertility countries: A third demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 32(3), 401–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Colgrove, J. (2002). The McKeown thesis: A historical controversy and its enduring influence. American Journal of Public Health, 92(5), 725–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Credit Suisse. (2017a). Global wealth databook. ZurichGoogle Scholar
  23. Credit Suisse. (2017b). Global wealth report. Zurich.Google Scholar
  24. Davis, K. (1963). The theory of change and response in modern demographic history. Population Index, 29(4), 345–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ehrlich, P. R. (1968). The population bomb. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  26. Ehrlich, P. R., & Ehrlich, A. H. (2009). The population bomb revisited. The Electronic Journal of Sustainable Development, 1(3), 63–71.Google Scholar
  27. Engels, F. (2008 [1892]). The condition of the working-class in England in 1844. New York: Cosimo.Google Scholar
  28. FAO. (n.d.). Food and agriculture data. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Accessed February 6, 2018.
  29. Flannery, K. V., & Marcus, J. (2012). The creation of inequality: How our prehistoric ancestors set the stage for monarchy, slavery, and empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Friedlander, D. (1969). Demographic response and population change. Demography, 6(4), 359–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Geddes, A. (2014). The EU, UKIP and the politics of immigration in Britain. Political Quarterly, 85(3), 289–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goldewijk, K. K., Beusen, A., & Janssen, P. (2010). Long-term dynamic modeling of global population and built-up area in a spatially explicit way: HYDE 3.1. The Holocene, 20(4), 565–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Goldscheider, C. (1971). Population, modernization, and social structure. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  34. Goldscheider, F. K., & Waite, L. J. (1993). New families, no families?: The transformation of the American home. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  35. Groth, H., & May, J. F. (Eds.). (2017). Africa’s population. In search of a demographic dividend. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. Haas, H. d. (2010). Migration transitions: A theoretical and empirical inquiry into the developmental drivers of international migration (IMI Working Paper 24). Oxford.Google Scholar
  37. Haas, H. d., Czaika, M., Flahaux, M.-L., Mahendra, E., Natter, K., Vezzoli, S., et al. (2018). International migration: Trends, determinants and policy effects (IMIn Working Paper Series 142). Oxford.Google Scholar
  38. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Harrington, M. (1963). The other America: Poverty in the United States. Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  40. Hirschman, C., & Tolnay, S. E. (2005). Social demography. In D. L. Poston & M. Micklin (Eds.), Handbook of population (pp. 419–449). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hummel, D., & Lux, A. (2007). Population decline and infrastructure: The case of the German water supply system. In Vienna Institute of Demography (Ed.), Vienna yearbook of population research 2007 (pp. 167–191). Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Huxley, A. (1932). Brave new world. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  43. IPBES. (2018). Summary for policymakers of the thematic assessment report on land degradation and restoration. Bonn: Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES).Google Scholar
  44. Johansson, S. R. (1994). Food for thought: Rhetoric and reality in modern mortality history. Historical Methods, 27(3), 101–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Joyce, K. (2008). Review: Demographic winter: The decline of the human family (The Harvard Divinity Bulletin 38.2). Accessed 22 July 2018.
  46. Kanner, L. (2016). The efficacy and legality of drones in modern warfare. Bond University Student Law Review, 4(1), Article1.Google Scholar
  47. Kohler, T. A., Smith, M. E., Bogaard, A., Feinman, G. M., Peterson, C. E., et al. (2017). Greater post-Neolithic wealth disparities in Eurasia than in North America and Mesoamerica. Nature, 551, 619–622.Google Scholar
  48. Lawrence, D., & Vandecar, K. (2015). Effects of tropical deforestation on climate and agriculture. Nature Climate Change, 5(1), 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lee, R. D. (2003). The demographic transition: Three centuries of fundamental change. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(4), 167–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Livi-Bacci, M. (2017). A concise history of world population (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lutz, W., & Samir, K. C. (2010). Dimensions of global population projections: what do we know about future population trends and structures? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B(365), 2779–2791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. MacInnes, J. (1998). The end of masculinity: The confusion of sexual genesis and sexual difference in modern society. Buckingham, PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  53. MacInnes, J., & Pérez Díaz, J. (2009). The reproductive revolution. Sociological Review, 57(2), 262–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Malthus, T. R. (1798). An Essay on the Principle of Population, as it affects the future improvement of society. With remarks on the speculations of Mr. Godwin, M. Condorcet and other writers. London: Johnson.Google Scholar
  55. Malthus, T. R. (1970). An essay on the principle of population: A summary view of the principle of population. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  56. Marshall, A.-M. (2005). Confronting sexual harassment: The law and politics of everyday life. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Marx, K. (1951). Theories of surplus value. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
  58. Marx, K. (1954). Capital: A critical analysis of capitalist production. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.Google Scholar
  59. McKeown, T. (1976). The modern rise of population. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  60. Meek, R. L., Meek, D. L., Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1971). Marx and Engels on the population bomb: Selections from the writings of Marx and Engels dealing with the theories of Thomas Robert Malthus (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: Ramparts Press.Google Scholar
  61. Messerschmidt, R. (2014). “Garbled demography” or “Demographization of the social”?: A Foucaultian discourse analysis of German demographic change at the beginning of the 21st Century. Historical Social Research, 39(1), 299–335.Google Scholar
  62. Milanović, B. (2016). Global inequality: A new approach for the age of globalization. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. MPIfDR, & VID. (n.d.). Human fertility database. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research; Vienna Institute of Demography. Accessed September 11, 2018.
  64. Nayab, D. (2007). Demographic dividend or demographic threat in Pakistan. SSRN Journal.
  65. Niephaus, Y., Kreyenfeld, M., & Sackmann, R. (Eds.). (2016). Handbuch Bevölkerungssoziologie [Handbook of the sociology of population]. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  66. O’Day, R., & Englander, D. (1993). Mr Charles Booth’s inquiry: Life and labour of the people in London reconsidered. London: Hambledon.Google Scholar
  67. Orwell, G. (1962). The road to Wigan Pier. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  68. Pamuk, Ş. (2007). The Black Death and the origins of the ‘Great Divergence’ across Europe, 1300–1600. European Review of Economic History, 11(3), 289–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Robertson, R., Di, H., Brown, D., & Dehejia, R. (2016). Working conditions, work outcomes, and policy in Asian Developing Countries. Manila: Asian Development Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rogers, A. (1990). Requiem for the net migrant. Geographical Analysis, 22(4), 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ryan, W. (1971). Blaming the victim. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  73. Sackmann, R. (2015). How do societies cope with complex demographic challenges?: A model. Coping with demographic change: A comparative view on education and local government in Germany and Poland (pp. 25–58). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  74. Sackmann, R., Bartl, W., & Jonda, B. (2015). Coping with demographic change: A comparative view on education and local government in Germany and Poland. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  75. Savoia, A., Easaw, J., & McKay, A. (2010). Inequality, democracy, and institutions: A Critical review of recent research. World Development, 38(2), 142–154. Scholar
  76. Simon, J. L. (1996). The ultimate resource 2. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Skeldon, R. (2012). Migration transitions revisited: Their continued relevance for the development of migration theory. Population, Space and Place, 18(2), 154–166. Scholar
  78. Spade, J. Z., & Valentine, C. G. (2008). The kaleidoscope of gender: Prisms, patterns, and possibilities. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  79. Szreter, S. (2018). Marx on Population: A Bicentenary Celebration. Population and Development Review, 44(4), 745–769. Scholar
  80. U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), Ethiopia Federal Ministry of Health, Malawi Ministry of Health, & Rwanda Ministry of Health. (2012). Three successful Sub-Saharan African family planning programs: Lessons for meeting the MDGs. Washington, DC: USAID. Accessed August 20, 2018.
  81. UCB & MPIfDR. (n.d.). Human mortality database. University of California, Berkeley; Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research. Accessed September 11, 2018.
  82. United Nations. (2017). World Population prospects: The 2017 revision. New York, NY. Accessed June 27, 2018.
  83. Vijayakumar, N., Sridharan, P., & Rao, K. C. S. (2010). Determinants of FDI in BRICS Countries: A panel analysis. International Journal of Business Science & Applied Management, 5(3), 1–13.Google Scholar
  84. Weiß, A. (2017). Soziologie globaler Ungleichheiten [Sociology of global inequalities]. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  85. WHO. (2016). World health statistics 2016: Monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  86. Wilson, D., & Purushothaman, R. (2003). Dreaming with BRICs: The path to 2050 (Global economics paper 99). New York, NY: Goldman Sachs.Google Scholar
  87. Woods, R. (2003). Urban-rural mortality differentials: Unresolved debate. Population and development review, 29(1), 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zelinsky, W. (1971). The hypothesis of the mobility transition. Geographical Review, 61(2), 219–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Ziegler, P. (1998). The black death. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social WorkBen-Gurion University of the NegevBeer ShevaIsrael
  2. 2.Institute of Sociology, Martin Luther University Halle-WittenbergHalleGermany
  3. 3.School of Public HealthUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamUSA

Personalised recommendations