United States of America

International Human Rights in US Law
  • Mark Weston Janis


What is the role of international human rights in U.S. law? This essay first introduces two recent important decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court. Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain addresses customary international human rights law. Medellin v. Texas has to do with treaties. Taken together, Sosa and Medellin assign international human rights judgments only a modest role in U.S. law. This modest role is really not all that surprising. Unlike the many states that belong either to the European Court of Human Rights or the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, the United States belongs to neither. So the extensive jurisprudence one finds in so many other Western states relating to the relationship between national law and an international human rights tribunal simply does not exist for the United States. However, there is much more to say about the relationship of U.S. law to international law in general that does impact on international human rights, and this essay concludes with a review of this long tradition.



With thanks to Alexa Millinger, UConn Law '14, for her help in proofreading and footnoting this essay.


  1. Caron D, Roth BR (2004) International decision: scope of Alien Tort Statute. Am J Int Law 98:798–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bekker PHF, Highet K (1998) International Court of Justice Orders U.S. to Stay Execution of Paraguayan National in Virginia. Available via Accessed 11 July 2017
  3. Blackstone W (1979) Commentaries on the laws of England. Reprint of 1st edn. 1765–1769. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  4. Burns JH, Hart HLA (1970) The collected works of Jeremy Bentham: an introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Chemerinsky E (2006) Constitutional law: principles and policies, 3rd edn. Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den RijnGoogle Scholar
  6. Damrosch LF et al (2004) Agora: the United States constitution and international law. Am J Int Law 98:42–108Google Scholar
  7. Hall KL et al (1991) American legal history: cases and materials. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Higgins R (1994) Problems and process: international law and how we use it. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Janis MW (1984) Jeremy Bentham and the fashioning of ‘international law’. Am J Int Law 78:405–418Google Scholar
  10. Janis MW (2005) Dred Scott and international law. Columbia J Transnl Law 43:763–810Google Scholar
  11. Janis MW (2010) America and the law of nations: 1776–1939. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Janis MW (2012) International law, 6th edn. Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den RijnGoogle Scholar
  13. Janis MW, Noyes JE (2014) International law: cases and commentary, 5th edn. Thomson West, EaganGoogle Scholar
  14. Lockwood B (1984) The United Nations Charter and United States civil rights litigation: 1946–1955. Iowa Law Rev 69:901–956Google Scholar
  15. Mydans S (1992) Judge clears Mexican in Agents’s killing. New York Times. 15 Dec 1992, A20. Available via Accessed 11 July 2017
  16. Wuerth I (2013) Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. Am J Int Law 107:601–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Weston Janis
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Connecticut School of LawHartfordUSA
  2. 2.University of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations