Advertisement

Understanding Naturally Occurring Data

  • Nikki Kiyimba
  • Jessica Nina Lester
  • Michelle O’Reilly
Chapter

Abstract

The focus of this chapter is to identify what constitutes naturally occurring data, distinguishing it from researcher-generated data. Core concepts for the book are defined in this chapter and clarity is provided regarding what the main tensions are in relation to naturally occurring data and its use in health research. There are some tensions regarding these definitions and this is critically discussed.

Keywords

Data Naturally occurring Researcher generated Health 

References

  1. Avison, D., Lau, F., Myers, M., & Nielsen, P. (1999). Action research. Communications of the ACM, 42(1), 94–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Demuth, C. (2018). Generalization from single cases and the concept of double dialogicality. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 52, 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Grbich, C. (1999). Qualitative research in health: An introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Griffin, C. (2007). Being dead and being there research interviews, sharing hand cream and the preference for analysing naturally occurring data. Discourse Studies, 9(2), 246–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation analysis (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kuper, A., Lingard, L., & Levinson, W. (2008). Critically appraising qualitative research. British Medical Journal, 337, 687–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mondada, L. (2013). The conversation analytic approach to data collection. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 32–56). West Sussex: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. O’Reilly, M., & Kiyimba, N. (2015). Advanced qualitative research: A guide to contemporary theoretical debates. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Paulus, T., Lester, J. N., & Dempster, P. (2013). Digital tools for qualitative research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Pleschberger, S., Seymour, J. E., Payne, S., Deschepper, R., Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D., & Rurup, M. L. (2011). Interviews on end-of-life care with older people: Reflections on six European studies. Qualitative Health Research, 21(11), 1588–1600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Potter, J. (2002). Two kinds of natural. Discourse Studies, 4(4), 539–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Potter, J. (2004). Discourse analysis as a way of analysing naturally occurring talk. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (2nd ed., pp. 200–221). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2005). Qualitative interviews in psychology: Problems and possibilities. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Potter, J., & Mulkay, M. (1985). Scientists’ interview talk: Interviews as a technique for revealing participants’ interpretative practices. In M. Brenner, J. Brown, & D. Canter (Eds.), The research interview: Uses and approaches (pp. 247–271). London: Academic. Press.Google Scholar
  17. Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. Silverman, D. (2010). Doing qualitative research (4th ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Silverman, D. (2015). Interpreting qualitative data (5th ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Smith, J., Hollway, W., & Mishler, E. (2005). Commentaries on Potter and Hepburn, ‘Qualitative interviews in psychology: problems and possibilities’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2(4), 309–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Willis, J. (2007). Foundations of qualitative research: Interpretative and critical approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nikki Kiyimba
    • 1
  • Jessica Nina Lester
    • 2
  • Michelle O’Reilly
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Social and Political ScienceUniversity of ChesterChesterUK
  2. 2.School of EducationIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  3. 3.The Greenwood Institute of Child HealthUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations