Advertisement

High-Impact Practices for Student Engagement in the Research University

  • Bryant L. Hutson
  • Lynn E. Williford
Chapter

Abstract

The authors describe students’ engagement in high-impact practices that promote positive student perceptions of campus climate and sense of belonging at one research university. Hutson and Williford used data collected through the Student Experience in the Research University (SERU) instrument to explore students’ level of engagement and their self-reported perception of campus climate and sense of belonging. Four demographic variables including academic classification, gender, ethnicity, and social class were also considered when examining students’ different levels of engagement and perceptions of campus climate. The authors provide discussion and implications for higher education professionals based on the use of the SERU data.

References

  1. Chang, M. J., Denson, N., Sáenz, V., & Misa, K. (2006). The educational benefits of sustaining cross-racial interaction among undergraduates. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(3), 430–455. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2006.0018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Denson, N., & Chang, M. J. (2009). Racial diversity matters: The impact of diversity-related student engagement and institutional context. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 322–353. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208323278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Denson, N., & Chang, M. J. (2015). Dynamic relationships: Identifying moderators that maximize benefits associated with diversity. The Journal of Higher Education, 86(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2015.0002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Douglass, J. A., & Zhao, C. M. (2013). Undergraduate research engagement at major US research universities (Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.14.13). Berkeley, CA: Center for Studies in Higher Education.Google Scholar
  5. Fries-Britt, S., & Griffin, K. A. (2007). The black box: How high-achieving Blacks resist stereotypes about Black Americans. Journal of College Student Development, 48(5), 509–524. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2007.0048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hernandez, E., Mobley, M., Coryell, G., Yu, E.-H., & Martinez, G. (2013). Examining the cultural validity of a college student engagement survey for Latinos. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 12(2), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192713475453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hurtado, S., & DeAngelo, L. (2012). Linking diversity and civic-minded practices with student outcomes: New evidence from national surveys. Liberal Education, 98(2). Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/liberaleducation/le-sp12/hurtado_deangelo.cfm.
  8. Kim, Y. K., & Sax, L. J. (2009). Student faculty interaction in research universities: Difference by student gender, race, social class and first generation status. Research in Higher Education, 50(5), 437–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-009-9127-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kuh, G. D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.Google Scholar
  10. Liu, R. L., & Lin, P. Y. (2017). Changes in multicultural experience: Action research on a service learning curriculum. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 30(3), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-016-9395-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Soria, K. M. (2012). Creating a successful transition for working-class first-year students. The Journal of College Orientation and Transition, 20(1), 44–55.Google Scholar
  12. Soria, K. M., & Bultmann, M. (2014) Supporting working-class students in higher education. NACADA Journal, 34(2), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.12930/NACADA-13-017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Soria, K. M., Stebleton, M. J., & Huesman, R. L. (2013). Class counts: Exploring differences in academic and social integration between working-class and middle/upper-class students at large, public research universities. Journal of College Student Retention, 15(2), 215–242. https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.15.2.e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tienda, M. (2013). Diversity ≠ inclusion: Promoting integration in higher education. Educational Researcher, 42(9), 467–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wilson, J. L. (2015). Maximizing impact: Purposefully incorporating diversity efforts within postsecondary systemwide and institutional strategic plans. Planning for Higher Education, 43(1), 15–23.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bryant L. Hutson
    • 1
  • Lynn E. Williford
    • 1
  1. 1.University of North Carolina-Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations