Advertisement

Device Evolution and New Concepts to Preserve Renal Artery Patency in Challenging Infrarenal Aortic Necks

  • Gianmarco de DonatoEmail author
  • Francesco Setacci
  • Edoardo Pasqui
  • Mariagnese Mele
  • Domenico Benevento
  • Giancarlo Palasciano
  • Carlo SetacciEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

At the beginning of the endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) era, a large number of patients were denied endovascular treatment as challenging proximal neck and narrow access vessels were responsible for EVAR ineligibility in more than 50% of cases.

Since then, stent-graft technology has evolved rapidly, limitations of earlier-generation devices have been overtaken, and EVAR eligibility has increased enormously. Still, in patients with complex aortic necks, proximal graft sealing remains a challenge with traditional self-expandable endograft.

This chapter focuses on the evolution over the years of endografts, in terms of profile and adaptability to challenging infrarenal aortic neck. The final section of the chapter is dedicated to the VENT procedure, a particular EVAR technique that combines the Ovation endograft implantation with open bare-metal stent in the renal arteries and offers a treatment option for patients with unfit challenging neck for traditional endograft.

References

  1. 1.
    Hallett JW Jr, Marshall DM, Petterson TM, et al. Graft-related complications after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: reassurance from a 36-year population-based experience. J Vasc Surg. 1997;25:277–84; discussion 285-276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Illig KA, Green RM, Ouriel K, et al. Fate of the proximal aortic cuff: implications for endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 1997;26:492–9; discussion 499-501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wever JJ, de Nie AJ, Blankensteijn JD, et al. Dilatation of the proximal neck of infrarenal aortic aneurysms after endovascular AAA repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000;19:197–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Faries PL, Briggs VL, Rhee JY, et al. Failure of endovascular aortoaortic tube grafts: a plea for preferential use of bifurcated grafts. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:868–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zarins CK. The US AneuRx Clinical Trial: 6-year clinical update 2002. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:904–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mehta M, Byrne WJ, Robinson H, et al. Women derive less benefit from elective endovascular aneurysm repair than men. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55:906–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sweet MP, Fillinger MF, Morrison TM, Abel D. The influence of gender and aortic aneurysm size on eligibility for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:931–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mehta M, Valdes FE, Nolte T, et al. One-year outcomes from an international study of the Ovation abdominal stent graft system for endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59:65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Greenberg RK, Chuter TA, Cambria RP, et al. Zenith abdominal aortic aneurysm endovascular graft. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carpenter JP. The Powerlink bifurcated system for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: four-year results of the US multicenter trial. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;47:239–43.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peterson BG, Matsumura JS, Brewster DC, Makaroun MS. Five-year report of a multicenter controlled clinical trial of open versus endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45:885–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Turnbull IC, Criado FJ, Sanchez L, et al. Five-year results for the talent enhanced low profile system abdominal stent graft pivotal trial including early and long-term safety and efficacy. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51:537–44; 544, e531-532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cao P, Verzini F, Parlani G, et al. Predictive factors and clinical consequences of proximal aortic neck dilatation in 230 patients undergoing abdominal aorta aneurysm repair with self-expandable stent-grafts. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:1200–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sternbergh WC 3rd, Money SR, Greenberg RK, Chuter TA. Influence of endograft oversizing on device migration, endoleak, aneurysm shrinkage, and aortic neck dilation: results from the Zenith multicenter trial. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:20–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tonnessen BH, Sternbergh WC 3rd, Money SR. Late problems at the proximal aortic neck: migration and dilation. Semin Vasc Surg. 2004;17:288–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sampaio SM, Panneton JM, Mozes G, et al. Aortic neck dilation after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: should oversizing be blamed? Ann Vasc Surg. 2006;20:338–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Conners MS 3rd, Sternbergh WC 3rd, Carter G, et al. Endograft migration one to four years after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with the AneuRx device: a cautionary note. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36:476–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Malas MB, Ohki T, Veith FJ, et al. Absence of proximal neck dilatation and graft migration after endovascular aneurysm repair with balloon-expandable stent-based endografts. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42:639–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dalainas I, Nano G, Bianchi P, et al. Aortic neck dilatation and endograft migration are correlated with selfexpanding endografts. J Endovasc Ther. 2007;14:318–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    de Donato G, Setacci F, Bresadola L, TriVascular Ovation Italian Study, et al. Aortic neck evolution after endovascular repair with TriVascular Ovation stent graft. J Vasc Surg. 2016;63(1):8–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2015.07.099. Epub 2015 Sep 26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stather PW, Wild JB, Sayers RD, et al. Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in patients with hostile neck anatomy. J Endovasc Ther. 2013;20(5):623–37.  https://doi.org/10.1583/13-4320MR.1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jordan WD Jr, Ouriel K, Mehta M, Aneurysm Treatment using the Heli-FX Aortic Securement System Global Registry ANCHOR, et al. Outcome-based anatomic criteria for defining the hostile aortic neck. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61(6):1383–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aburahma AF, Campbell JE, Mousa AY, et al. Clinical outcomes for hostile versus favorable aortic neck anatomy in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair using modular devices. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54(1):13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stather PW, Sayers RD, Cheah A, et al. Outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair in patients with hostile neck anatomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;44(6):556–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Abbruzzese TA, Kwolek CJ, Brewster DC, et al. Outcomes following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR): an anatomic and device-specific analysis. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48(1):19–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2008.02.003. Epub 2008 Apr 28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hobo R, Kievit J, Leurs LJ, et al. Influence of severe infrarenal aortic neck angulation on complications at the proximal neck following endovascular AAA repair: a EUROSTAR study. J Endovasc Ther. 2007;14:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Spanos K, Karathanos C, Saleptsis V, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of migration after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Vascular. 2015;24(3):323–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Antoniou GA, Georgiadis GS, Antoniou SA, et al. A meta-analysis of outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with hostile and friendly neck anatomy. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57:527–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schanzer A, Greenberg RK, Hevelone N, et al. Predictors of abdominal aortic aneurysm sac enlargement after endovascular repair. Circulation. 2011;123(24):2848–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Georgakarakos E, Ioannou CV, Georgiadis GS, Storck M, Trellopoulos G, Koutsias S, et al. The Ovation abdominal stent graft for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: current evidence and future perspectives. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2016;13:253–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mehta M. Rethink the neck. How the Ovation prime system is revolutionizing the way we approach EVAR. Endovascular Today. 2014. p. 3–6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gianmarco de Donato
    • 1
    Email author
  • Francesco Setacci
    • 2
  • Edoardo Pasqui
    • 1
  • Mariagnese Mele
    • 1
  • Domenico Benevento
    • 1
  • Giancarlo Palasciano
    • 1
  • Carlo Setacci
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Vascular Surgery, Department of Medicine, Surgery and NeuroscienceUniversity of SienaSienaItaly
  2. 2.Vascula SurgeryIRCCS MultimedicaMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations