Advertisement

An Overview of Love Between Humans and Artificial Partners

  • Adrian David Cheok
  • Emma Yann ZhangEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Human–Computer Interaction Series book series (HCIS)

Abstract

In this chapter, we discover the history of love between humans and artificial partners, which has its origins in ancient Greek mythologies. Our fascination with artificial companions is evident in science fiction, films and television. With the research developments in robotics and artificial intelligence, intimate relationship with virtual and robotic partners is no longer pure science fiction, but it is also studied as a serious academic subject, known as Love and Sex with Robots. In order to continue with the discussion on this topic, it is necessary to understand the complicated emotion of love. We will attempt to explain this human desire by examining several popular theories of love. Finally, we will discuss whether and how could this new type of love be accepted in society.

References

  1. 1.
    Asimov I (1957) Earth is room enough. Doubleday, Garden CityGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Asimov I (1978) The machine and the robot. Science fiction: contemporary mythology, pp 248–52Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Asimov I (1983) Goodman RB (ed) True loveGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Asimov I, Silverberg R, Batho K (1993) The positronic man. Doubleday, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baumeister RF, Leary MR (1995) The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol Bull 117(3):497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Becker-Asano C, Ishiguro H (2011) Evaluating facial displays of emotion for the android robot Geminoid F. In: 2011 IEEE workshop on affective computational intelligence (WACI), IEEE, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berscheid E (2006) Searching for the meaning of “love”. The new psychology of love, pp 171–183Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beschorner T, Krause F (2017) Dolores and robot sex: fragments of non-anthropocentric ethics. In: International conference on love and sex with robots. Springer, Berlin, pp 128–137Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bołtuć P (2017) Church-turing lovers. Robot ethics 2.0: from autonomous cars to artificial intelligence. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 214Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bryce E (2013) Manipulative machines: why we like robots (pCWorld). https://www.pcworld.com/article/2040862/manipulative-machines-why-we-like-robots.html
  11. 11.
    Calvo RA, D’Mello S (2010) Affect detection: an interdisciplinary review of models, methods, and their applications. IEEE Trans Affect Comput 1(1):18–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cheok AD, Levy D (eds) (2017) Love and sex with robots: third international conference, LSR 2017, London, UK, December 19–20, 2017. Revised selected papers, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cheok AD, Devlin K, Levy D (eds) (2016) Love and sex with robots: second international conference, LSR 2016, London, UK, December 19–20, 2016. Revised selected papers, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dick PK (1968) Do androids dream of electric sheep? Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dion KK, Dion KL (2006) Individualism, collectivism, and the psychology of love. The new psychology of love, pp 298–312Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Edirisinghe C, Cheok AD (2016) Robots and intimacies: a preliminary study of perceptions, and intimacies with robots. In: International conference on love and sex with robots. Springer, Berlin, pp 137–147Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fisher HE, Aron A, Mashek D, Li H, Brown LL (2002) Defining the brain systems of lust, romantic attraction, and attachment. Arch Sex Behav 31(5):413–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fisher HE, Aron A, Brown LL (2006) Romantic love: a mammalian brain system for mate choice. Philos Trans R Soc B 361(1476):2173–2186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fong T, Nourbakhsh I, Dautenhahn K (2003) A survey of socially interactive robots. Robot Auton Syst 42(3–4):143–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Friedman B, Kahn Jr PH, Hagman J (2003) Hardware companions? What online AIBO discussion forums reveal about the human-robotic relationship. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, pp 273–280Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Galbraith PW (2011) Bishōjo games:‘techno-intimacy’and the virtually human in Japan. Game Stud 11, 2Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    GameLook (2018) [paying for love! “love and producer" DAU exceeds 4 million! monthly revenue expected to reach 300 million] (translation). http://www.gamelook.com.cn/2018/01/317760
  23. 23.
    de Graaf MM, Allouch SB, van Dijk JA (2017) Long-term evaluation of a social robot in real homes. Interact Stud 17(3):462–491Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Helm B (2017) Love. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, fall, 2017th edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hendrick C, Hendrick SS (1986) A theory and method of love. J Personal Soc Psychol 50(2):392–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hoffmann L, Krämer NC, Lam-Chi A, Kopp S (2009) Media equation revisited: do users show polite reactions towards an embodied agent? In: International workshop on intelligent virtual agents. Springer, Berlin, pp 159–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kim KJ, Park E, Sundar SS (2013) Caregiving role in human-robot interaction: a study of the mediating effects of perceived benefit and social presence. Comput Hum Behav 29(4):1799–1806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Krämer NC, Rosenthal-von der Pütten AM, Hoffmann L (2015) Social effects of virtual and robot companions. The handbook of the psychology of communication technology, pp 137–159Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lah K (2009) Tokyo man marries video game character (CNN). http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/12/16/japan.virtual.wedding/index.html
  30. 30.
    Law JM (1995) Religious reflections on the human body. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lee JA (1973) Colours of love: an exploration of the ways of loving. New Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Levy D (2007) Intimate relationships with artificial partners. PhD thesis, Maastricht UniversityGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Levy D (2007) Love and sex with robots: the evolution of human-robot relationships. Harper Collins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Levy D (2007) Loving our pets. Love and sex with robots: the evolution of human-robot relationships. Harper Collins, pp 46–63. 2Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Libin A (2001) Virtual reality as a complex interactive system: a multidimensional model of person artificial partner co-relations. In: Proceedings Seventh International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia, IEEE, pp 652–657Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Libin AV, Libin EV (2004) Person-robot interactions from the robopsychologists’ point of view: the robotic psychology and robotherapy approach. Proc IEEE 92(11):1789–1803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mar A (2017) Are we ready for intimacy with robots? (Wired). https://www.wired.com/2017/10/hiroshi-ishiguro-when-robots-act-just-like-humans/
  38. 38.
    Marazziti D, Akiskal HS, Rossi A, Cassano GB (1999) Alteration of the platelet serotonin transporter in romantic love. Psychol Med 29(3):741–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Marsh J, Ogura J (2017) The rise of romance gaming: is the perfect boyfriend inside your phone? (cNN). https://edition.cnn.com/2016/11/21/asia/romance-gaming-japan/index.html
  40. 40.
    Metropolis magazine (2009) Love bytes. https://metropolisjapan.com/love-bytes/
  41. 41.
    Moran ME (2006) The da vinci robot. J Endourol 20(12):986–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Moseley A (2001) Philosophy of love. In: Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. https://www.iep.utm.edu/love/
  43. 43.
    National Institute of Population and Social Security Research (2015) The fifteenth Japanese national fertility survey in 2015. http://www.ipss.go.jp/ps-doukou/e/doukou15/Nfs15R_points_eng.pdf
  44. 44.
    Nomura S, Soon J, Samani HA, Godage I, Narangoda M, Cheok AD, Katai O (2009) Feasibility of social interfaces based on tactile senses for caring communication. In: the 8th international workshop on SID, vol 68Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rosenthal-von der Pütten AM, Krämer NC, Hoffmann L, Sobieraj S, Eimler SC (2013) An experimental study on emotional reactions towards a robot. Int J Soc Robot 5(1):17–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Reeves B, Nass CI (1996) The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ruptly (2017) ‘Until a reboot do us part’: Japanese guys are marrying VR brides (video). https://www.rt.com/viral/394916-virtual-reality-brides-japan/
  48. 48.
    Sabelli AM, Kanda T, Hagita N (2011) A conversational robot in an elderly care center: an ethnographic study. In: 2011 6th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI), IEEE, pp 37–44Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sharkey N, van Wynsberghe A, Robbins S, Hancock E (2017) Our sexual future with robots. Foundation for Responsible RoboticsGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    South China Morning Post (2018) China’s women gamers take centre-stage with ‘virtual boyfriend’ game love and producer. http://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/2127116/chinas-women-gamers-take-centre-stage-virtual-boyfriend-game-love
  51. 51.
    Sternberg RJ (1986) A triangular theory of love. Psychol Rev 93(2):119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Syrdal DS, Dautenhahn K, Koay KL, Ho WC (2014) Views from within a narrative: evaluating long-term human-robot interaction in a naturalistic environment using open-ended scenarios. Cogn Comput 6(4):741–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Usher P (2016) Why women are choosing virtual boyfriends over real ones? Vogue Mag. https://www.vogue.com/article/virtual-romance-apps
  54. 54.
    Wada K, Shibata T (2006) Robot therapy in a care house-its sociopsychological and physiological effects on the residents. In: Proceedings 2006 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, 2006. ICRA 2006, IEEE, pp 3966–3971Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    White JK, Hendrick SS, Hendrick C (2004) Big five personality variables and relationship constructs. Personal Individ Differ 37(7):1519–1530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wilks Y (2004) Artificial companions. In: International workshop on machine learning for multimodal interaction. Springer, Berlin, pp 36–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Imagineering InstituteIskander PuteriMalaysia

Personalised recommendations