Advertisement

Methodology and Methods in Interdisciplinary Research

  • Úrsula Oswald Spring
Chapter
Part of the Pioneers in Arts, Humanities, Science, Engineering, Practice book series (PAHSEP, volume 17)

Abstract

All the different theoretical and disciplinary imputes I got in my life tried to overcome the prevailing constraints of science in theoretical, conceptual and empirical respects and to collectively experiment with research to understand better the complex socio-environmental reality. There was also increasing concern about the discrimination of women in science and the increasing number of poor and marginalised women on earth. Why did this occur all over the world in industrialised, developing and communist countries? What are the deep-rooted causes for this discrimination and subordination? Therefore, my interest in gender studies emerged in conjunction with an integrated epistemological approach to interdisciplinary research.

References

  1. Arizpe, Lourdes (2004). Los retos culturales de México, México, D.F., Miguel Ángel Porrúa, CRIM-UNAM.Google Scholar
  2. Barthes, Roland (1987). El susurro del Lenguaje, Barcelona, Paidós.Google Scholar
  3. Baudrillard, Jean (1991). La transparencia del Mal, Barcelona, Anagrama,Google Scholar
  4. Bové, Paul (1992). La estela de la Teoría, Madrid, Cátedra.Google Scholar
  5. Brauch, Hans Günter, Úrsula Oswald Spring, John Grin, Czeslaw Mesjasz, Patricia Kameri-Mbote, Navnita Chadha Behera, Bechir Chourou, Heinz Krummenacher (Eds.) (2009). Facing Global Environmental Change: Environmental, Human, Energy, Food, Health and Water Security Concepts, Berlin - Heidelberg, Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Cadena Barquin, Félix (2003). “Aprender a emprender: La economía de solidaridad como alternativa a la globalización excluyente”, in Úrsula Oswald Spring (Ed.). Soberanía y desarrollo regional. El México que queremos, Mexico, D.F., UNAM, Coltax, Canacintra, pp. 285–300.Google Scholar
  7. Cadena Barquin, Félix (Ed.) (2009). De Foro a Foro. Contribuciones y perspectivas de la economía de solidaria en México en Contexto de crisis global, Mexico, D.F., FLASEP.Google Scholar
  8. Calvo, José Luis (Ed.) (2012). Políticas macroeconómicas para el desarrollo sostenido, México D.F., UNAM, Juan Pablos Editor.Google Scholar
  9. Compte, Auguste (1865). A General View of Positivism: Or, Summary Exposition of the System of Thought and Life, London, Trubner & Co.Google Scholar
  10. D’Eaubonne, Françoise (1974). Le Féminisme ou la Mort, Paris, Pierre Horay.Google Scholar
  11. Dillon, D. (2001). A review of the Santa Fe Institute: Institutional and individual qualities of expert interdisciplinary work [Working Paper]. Harvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  12. Galtung, Johan (1971). “A structural theory of imperialism”, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 81–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glansdorff, P., I. Prigogine (1971). Thermodynamic theory of structure stability and fluctuations, London, Wiley-Intersciences.Google Scholar
  14. Gutiérrez, Marcos (2009). ¿Qué ocasiona la crisis económica actual?, UPAEP (March), pp. 4–6.Google Scholar
  15. Habermas, Jürgen (1998). Más allá del Estado nacional, Mexico, D.F., FCE.Google Scholar
  16. Habermas, Jürgen (2000). La constelación posnacional: ensayos políticos, Barcelona, Paidós.Google Scholar
  17. Habermas, Jürgen (2001). Kommunikatives Handeln und detranszendentalisierte Vernunft, Stuttgart, Reclam.Google Scholar
  18. Held, David, Anthony McGrew (Eds.) (2007). Globalization Theory: approaches and controversies, Cambridge, Polity Press.Google Scholar
  19. Huber, Robert, Harald Bufmann, Alexandre Buttler, Andres Riglin (2013b). “Sustainable land-use practices in European mountain regions under global change: an integrated research approach, Ecol Soc, Vol. 18, No.3,  https://doi.org/10.5751/es-05375-180337: 37.
  20. Huber, Robert, Simon Briner, Harald Bugmann, Ché Elkin, Christian Hirschi, Roman Seidl, Rebecca Snell, Andreas Rigling (2014). “Inter- and transdisciplinary perspective on the integration of ecological processes into ecosystem services analysis in a mountain region”, Vol. 3, No 9, http://www.ecologicalprocesses.com/content/3/1/9.
  21. INEGI (1960–2017). “Data bank”, Aguascalientes, INEGI.Google Scholar
  22. INEGI-ENVIPE (2016). Encuesta Nacional de Victimización y Percepción sobre Seguridad Pública 2016, Aguascalientes, INEGI.Google Scholar
  23. INEGI (2017). Encuesta Nacional sobre la Dinámica de las Relaciones de los Hogares 2016, Aguascalientes, INEGI.Google Scholar
  24. IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] (2012). Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. IPCC (2014a). Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC] (2014b). Climate Change 2014. Mitigation of Climate Change. Working Group III Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Johnston, R. (2003) Geography: A different sort of discipline? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 133–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaldor, Mary, Helmut Anheier, Larlies Glasius (Eds.) (2003). Global Civil Society 2003, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lara Ponce, Estuardo, Laura Caso Barrera, Mario Aliphat Fernández (2012). “El sistema milpa roza, tumba y quema de los maya itzá de San Andrés y San José, Petén Guatemala Ra Ximhai, Vol. 8, No. 2 (May-August), México, Universidad Autónoma Indígena de México El Fuerte, pp. 71–92.Google Scholar
  30. Liverman, Diana M. (1990). “Global Warming and Mexican Agriculture: Some Preliminary Results”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 80 No. 1, pp. 49–72, http://www.ciesin.org/docs/004-039b/004-039b.html.
  31. Magaloni Kerpel, Ana Laura (2013). “Arbitrariedad e ineficiencia en la persecución criminal en México”, in J.L. Calvo (Ed.), Seguridad pública, derechos humanos y cohesión social, Mexico, D.F., UNAM, Juan Pablos, pp. 187–204.Google Scholar
  32. MA [Millennium Ecosystem Assessment] (2005). Ecosystems and the Human Well-Being, Washington, D.C., Island Press.Google Scholar
  33. Mies, Maria (1985). Patriarchy & Accumulation on a World Scale. Women in the International Division of Labour, London, Zed Books.Google Scholar
  34. Met Office (2017). Climate: Observations, projections and impacts, http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate-guide/science/uk/obs-projections-impacts.
  35. Minian, Isaac, Ángel Martínez, Jenny Ibáñez (2017). “Technological Change and the Relocation of the Apparel Industry”, Problemas del Desarrolo. Revista Latinoamerican de Economia, Vol. 48, No. 188 (January–March).Google Scholar
  36. Munroe, Robert (2010a). ENSO Forced Changes in Precipitation Distributions and Related Global Circulation Patterns: Gulf of Mexico Region, http://thescholarship.ecu.edu/bitstream/handle/10342/2898/Munroe_ecu_0600M_10237.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
  37. Munroe, Robert (2010b). ENSO Forced Changes in Precipitation Distributions and Related Global Circulation Patterns: Gulf of Mexico Region, Master thesis, Greenville, The Faculty of the Department of Geography, East Carolina University.Google Scholar
  38. Newell, W. H. (2001). A theory of interdisciplinary studies, Issues in Integrative Studies, No. 19, pp. 1–25; at: http://www.units.muohio.edu/aisorg/pubs/issues1/restricted/042/paper.pdf (30 October 2007).
  39. NOAA [National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration] (2016). “Precipitation change in Mexico, from 1950–2000 to 2021–2040”, Miami, NOAA.Google Scholar
  40. Oswald Spring, Úrsula (1991). Estrategias de Supervivencia en la Ciudad de Mexico [Survival Strategies in Mexico City], Cuernavaca, CRIM-UNAM.Google Scholar
  41. Oswald Spring, Úrsula (2009). “Food as a New Human and Livelihood Security Challenge”, in Hans Günter Brauch et al. (Eds.), Facing Global Environmental Change: Environmental, Human, Energy, Food, Health and Water Security Concepts, Berlin - Heidelberg, Springer, pp. 473–502.Google Scholar
  42. Oswald Spring, Úrsula (2013). “Dual vulnerability among female household heads”, Acta Colombiana de Psicología, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 19–30.Google Scholar
  43. Pérez Correa, Catalina (2013). “Las penas de prisión como generadoras de incumplidores de derecho”, in J.L. Calvo (Ed.), Seguridad pública, derechos humanos y cohesión social, Mexico, D.F., UNAM, Juan Pablos, pp. 205–220.Google Scholar
  44. Piaget, Jean (1950). The Psychology of Intelligence, London, Routledge – Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  45. Piaget, Jean (1972a). Psychology and Epistemology: Towards a Theory of Knowledge, Harmondsworth, Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  46. Piaget, Jean (1972b). The Psychology of Intelligence, Totowa, Littlefield.Google Scholar
  47. Piaget, Jean (1985). Seis estudios de psicología, Barcelona, Ed. Labor.Google Scholar
  48. Piaget, Jean, Bärbel Imhelder (1969). The Psychology of the Child, New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
  49. Piaget, Jean, Rolando García (1982). Psicogénesis e Historia de la Ciencia, Mexico, D.F., Siglo XXI Eds.Google Scholar
  50. Pickup, Francine (2001). Ending Violence against Women: A Challenge for Development and Humanitarian Work, Oxford, Oxfam Publication.Google Scholar
  51. Piketty, Thomas (2013). Le Capital au XXI Siècle, Paris, Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  52. Piñeyro, José Luis (2013). “Causas e interpretaciones de la crisis de seguridad pública”, in J.L. Calvo (Ed.), Seguridad pública, derechos humanos y cohesión social, Mexico, D.F., UNAM, Juan Pablos, pp. 177–191.Google Scholar
  53. Preiswerk, Roy (1984). À contre-courants. L´enjeu des relations interculturelles, Lausanne, Ed. d´en bas.Google Scholar
  54. Prigogine, Ilya (1994). La estructura de la complejidad, Madrid, Alianza Universidad.Google Scholar
  55. Prigogine, Ilya (1997). The End of Certainty-Time’s Flow and the Law of Nature, New York, The Free Press.Google Scholar
  56. Prigogine, Ilya, Isabelle Stengers (1984). Order out of Chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature, London, Flamingo.Google Scholar
  57. Repko, A. (2005). Interdisciplinary practice: A student guide to research and writing (Preliminary edition), Boston, Pearson Custom.Google Scholar
  58. Reardon B. A. (1996). Sexism and the War System, New York, Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Reardon, Betty A. (1980). “Moving to the Future”, Network, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 14–21.Google Scholar
  60. Richard, Nelly (1998). “Antidisciplina, transdisciplina y redisciplinamientos del saber”, Revista de Estudios Sociales, No. 1, August.Google Scholar
  61. Saldaña Fabela, Pilar (2003). “Calidad del agua en la cuenca alta del río Balsas en Tlaxcala y Puebla”, in Ú. Oswald Spring (Ed.), El recurso agua en al Alto Balsas, Cuernavaca, CRIM/IGF-UNAM, Coltlax, pp. 255–267.Google Scholar
  62. Semarnat-INE (2014). Mexico. Fifth National Communication to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Mexico, D.F., INE-SEMARNAT.Google Scholar
  63. SHCP [Ministry of Finance] (2016). “Tax evasion data bank”, www.shcp.gob.mx.
  64. Sousa Santos, Boaventura (2009a). Sociología jurídica crítica. Para un nuevo sentido común del derecho, Madrid, Editorial Trotta.Google Scholar
  65. Sousa Santos, Boaventura (2009b). Una epistemología del sur, México, D.F., CLACSO, Siglo XXI Eds.Google Scholar
  66. Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2016). The Great Divide. Unequal societies and what we can do about them, New York, W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  67. Stiglitz, Joseph (2010). Freefall: America, Free Markets, and the Sinking of the World Economy, New York, W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  68. Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2002). Globalization and its Discontents, New York, New Press.Google Scholar
  69. Strahm Rudolf H., Úrsula Oswald Spring (199025). Por Esto Somos Tan Pobres [For this reason we are so poor], Cuernavaca, CRIM-UNAM.Google Scholar
  70. Varoufakis, Yanis (2015). El Minotauro Global. EEUU, Europa y el futuro de la economía mundial, México, D.F., Paidós.Google Scholar
  71. Warren, Karen J. (Ed.) (1997). Ecofeminism. Women, Culture Nature, Bloomington, Indiana University.Google Scholar
  72. Wilder, Margaret, Christopher A. Scott, Nicolás Pineda Pablos, Robert G. Varady, Gregg M. Garfin, Jamie McEvoy (2010) “Adapting Across Boundaries: Climate Change, Social Learning, and Resilience in the U.S.-Mexico Border Region”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100: 4, 917–928, First published on: 15 September 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Youngblood, D. (2006). Map use across the disciplines, Journal of Map and Geography Libraries, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 33–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Youngblood, D. (2007). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and bridging disciplines: A matter of process, Journal of Research Practice, Vol. 3, No. 2, p. 1–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Regional Centre for Multidisciplinary Research (CRIM)National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM)CuernavacaMexico

Personalised recommendations