Advertisement

“Opportunity to Read”: Student Voice as a Reading Engagement Enabler

  • Clarence Ng
  • Brendan Bartlett
  • Stephen N. Elliott
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, we examine the opportunity to read in schools that serve mostly disadvantaged students from low socioeconomic status (SES) families. Beginning with a discussion on the literature and research on reading motivation and engagement, we argue that the conception of effective readers as motivated and strategic needs attention in its applicability among reluctant readers coming from disadvantaged backgrounds. Often, disadvantaged readers exhibit a high level of reluctance to read in school alongside a persistent pattern of underachievement. In response, some teachers react by dumbing down the reading curriculum, focusing on basic skills training using controlling teaching practices. Such practices will unintentionally limit students’ opportunities to engage in meaningful reading and hamper their reading enjoyment. We used data drawn from a case study based on repeated observations and interviews to describe how students’ voices were utilized to drive the development of new reading practices that promoted reading for Year 4 students in a low SES school in Queensland, Australia. This case study illustrates how seeking, honoring, and acting on students’ voices enable disadvantaged students to re-engage with reading for enjoyment.

Keywords

Reading motivation Reading engagement Student voice Reading achievement gap Disadvantaged students 

References

  1. Afflerbach, P., & Cho, B. (2009). Identifying and describing constructively responsive comprehension strategies in new and traditional forms of reading. In S. Israel & G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 69–90). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, P. A., & The Disciplined Reading and Learning Research Laboratory. (2012). Reading into the future: Competence for the 21st century. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 259–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alloway, T. P., Gathercole, S. E., Kirkwood, H., & Elliott, J. (2009). The cognitive and behavioural characteristics of children with low working memory. Child Development, 80(2), 606–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anmarkrud, Ø., & Bråten, I. (2009). Motivation for reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 252–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker, L., & Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of Children’s motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(4), 452–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker, M. I. (2002). Reading resistance in middle school: What can be done? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45(5), 364–366.Google Scholar
  7. Baroutsis, A., McGregor, G., & Mills, M. (2016a). Pedagogic voice: Student voice in teaching and engagement pedagogies. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 24(1), 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blackberry, G., & Ng, C. (2016). Reading was like my nightmare but now it’s my thing: A narrative of growth and change. In C. Ng & B. Bartlett (Eds.), Improving reading in the 21st century: International research and innovations. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Botsas, G., & Padeliadu, S. (2003). Goal orientation and reading comprehension strategy use among students with and without reading difficulties. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 477–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bragg, S. (2010). Consulting young people: A literature review. Newcastle: Creativity, Culture and Education.Google Scholar
  11. Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Chapman, J. W., & Tunmer, W. E. (1995). Development of young children’s self-concepts: An examination of emerging sub-components and their relationship with reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(1), 154–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Compton-Lilly, C. (2006). Identity, childhood culture, and literacy learning: A case study. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 6, 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Compton-Lilly, C. (2007). The complexities of reading capital in two Puerto Rican families. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 72–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Conradi, K., Jang, B. G., & McKenna, M. C. (2014). Motivation terminology in reading research: A conceptual review. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 127–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cook-Sather, A. (2006). Sound, presence, and power: “Student voice” in educational research and reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 34(6), 359–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crowe, E. C., Connor, C. M., & Petscher, Y. (2009). Examining the core: Relations among reading curricula, poverty, and first through third grade reading achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 47(3), 187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Daniels, D. H., Kalkman, D. L., & McCombs, B. L. (2001). Young children’s perspectives on learning and teacher practices in different classroom contexts: Implications for motivation. Early Education and Development, 12(2), 253–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De Naeghel, J., & Van Keer, H. (2013). The relation of student and class-level characteristics to primary school students’ autonomous reading motivation: A multi-level approach. Journal of Research in Reading, 36(4), 351–370.Google Scholar
  20. Fielding, M. (2001). Students as radical agents of change. Journal of Educational Change, 2(2), 123–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fielding, M. (2004). Transformative approaches to student voice: Theoretical underpinnings, recalcitrant realities. British Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Foorman, B. R., Schatschneider, C., Eakin, M. N., Fletcher, J. M., Moats, L. C., & Francis, D. J. (2006). The impact of instructional practices in grades 1 and 2 on reading and spelling achievement in high poverty schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Guthrie, J. T., Hoa, A. L. W., Wigfield, A., Tonks, S. M., Humenick, N. M., & Littles, E. (2007a). Reading motivation and reading comprehension growth in the later elementary years. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 282–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guthrie, J. T., Klauda, S. L., & Ho, A. N. (2013). Modeling the relationships among reading instruction, motivation, engagement, and achievement for adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly., 48(1), 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guthrie, J. T., McRae, A., & Klauda, S. L. (2007b). Contributions of concept-oriented reading instruction to knowledge about interventions for motivations in reading. Educational Psychologist, 42(4), 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 403–422). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Metsala, J. L., & Cox, K. E. (1999). Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 231–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Irvin, M. J., Meece, J. L., Byun, S., Farmer, T. W., & Hutchins, B. C. (2011). Relationship of school context to rural youth’s educational achievement and aspirations. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(9), 1225–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ivey, G., & Broaddus, K. (2001). Just plain reading: A survey of what makes students want to read in middle school classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(4), 350–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Klauda, S. L. (2009). The role of parents in adolescents’ reading motivation and activity. Educational Psychology Review, 21(4), 325–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2015). Conparing relations of motivation, engagement, and achievement among struggling and advanced adolescent readers. Reading and Writing, 28(2), 239–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Levin, B. (2000). Putting students at the centre in education reform. Journal of Educational Change, 1(2), 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. MacRuairc, G. (2011). They’re my words–I’ll talk how I like! Examining social class and linguistic practice among primary-school children. Language and Education, 25(6), 535–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meece, J. L., & Miller, S. D. (2001). A longitudinal analysis of elementary school students’ achievement goals in literacy activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 454–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mitra, D. L. (2004). The significance of students: Can increasing “student voice” in schools lead to gains in youth development? Teachers College Record, 106, 651–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mitra, D. L. (2006). Student voice from the inside and outside: The positioning of challengers. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4, 315–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mitra, D. L., & Gross, S. J. (2009). Increasing student voice in high school reform: Building partnerships, improving outcomes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37(4), 522–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nes Ferrara, S. (2007). Reading fluency and self-efficacy: A case study. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 52(3), 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ng, C., & Bartlett, B. (2013). Case studies of disadvantaged students’ reading motivation: Avoiding a deficit perspective. In P. Jalinek (Ed.), Education in Australia: Cultural influences, global perspectives and social challenges (pp. 179–106). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Publisher.Google Scholar
  42. Ng, C., Bartlett, B. J., Chester, I., & Kersland, S. (2013). Improving reading performance for economically-disadvantaged students: Combining strategy instruction and motivational support. Reading Psychology, 34(3), 257–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ng, C., & Graham, S. (2017). Engaging readers in the twenty-first century: What we know and need to know more. In C. Ng & B. Bartlett (Eds.), Improving reading and reading engagement in the 21st century (pp. 17–46). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nolen, S. B. (2007). Young children’s motivation to read and write: Development in social contexts. Cognition and Instruction, 25(2), 219–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pope, D. C. (2001). Doing school: How we are creating a generation of stressed out, materialistic, and miseducated students. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Allington, R., Block, C. C., Morrow, L., Tracey, D., et al. (2001). A study of effective first-grade literacy instruction. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(1), 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Mistretta-Hampston, J., & Echevarria, M. (1998). Literacy instruction in 10 fourth-grade classrooms in upstate New York. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2(2), 159–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Quinn, S., & Owen, S. (2014). Freedom to grow: Children’s perspectives of student voice. Childhood Education, 90(3), 192–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ranson, S. (2000). Recognizing the pedagogy of voice in a learning community. Educational Management & Administration, 28(3), 263–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rashid, F. L., Morris, R. D., & Sevcik, R. A. (2005). Relationship between home literacy environment and reading achievement in children with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(1), 2–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Retelsdorf, J., Köller, O., & Möller, J. (2014). Reading achievement and reading self-concept–testing the reciprocal effects model. Learning and Instruction, 29, 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rudduck, J. (2007). Student voice, student engagement, and school reform. In D. Thiessen & A. Cook-Sather (Eds.), International handbook of student experience in elementary and secondary school (pp. 587–610). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rudduck, J., & Flutter, J. (2000). Pupil participation and pupil perspective: Carving a new order of experience. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(1), 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rudduck, J., & Flutter, J. (2004). How to improve your school: Giving pupils a voice. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  55. Schaeffner, E., & Schiefele, U. (2007). The effect of experimental manipulation of student motivation on the situational representation of text. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 755–772.Google Scholar
  56. Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smyth, J., McInerney, P., & Fish, T. (2013). Blurring the boundaries: From relational learning towards a critical pedagogy of engagement for disengaged disadvantaged young people. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 21(2), 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Solheim, O. J. (2011). The impact of reading self-efficacy and task value on reading comprehension scores in different item formats. Reading Psychology, 32(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Taboada, A., Tonks, S., Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. (2009). Effects of motivational and cognitive variables on reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 22, 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Taylor, B. M., Pearson, P. D., Clark, K., & Walpole, S. (2000). Effective schools and accomplished teachers: Lessons about primary-grade reading instruction in low-income schools. The Elementary School Journal, 101(2), 121–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Taylor, C., & Robinson, C. (2009). Student voice: Theorising power and participation. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 17(2), 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ukkola, A., & Korkeamäki, R. L. (2017). Engaging students in the “joy of reading” programme in Finland. In C. Ng & B. Bartlett (Eds.), Improving reading and reading engagement in the 21st Century (pp. 143–165). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. UNICEF. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. Retreived from http://www.unicef.org/crc/fulltext.htm.
  64. Unrau, N., & Schlackman, J. (2006). Motivation and its relationship with reading achievement in an urban middle school. Journal of Educational Research, 100, 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. van der Linden, J., & Renshaw, P. (2004). Dialogic learning: Shifting perspectives to learning, instruction and teaching. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Walker, D., Greenwood, C., Hart, B., & Carta, J. (1994). Prediction of school outcomes based on early language production and socioeconomic factors. Child Development, 65(2), 606–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wang, J. H., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 162–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wharton-McDonald, R., Pressley, M., & Hampston, J. M. (1998). Literacy instruction in nine first-grade classrooms: Teacher characteristics and student achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 99(2), 101–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J. T., Tonks, S., & Perencevich, K. C. (2004). Children’s motivation for reading: Domain specificity and instructional influences. Journal of Educational Research, 97, 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clarence Ng
    • 1
  • Brendan Bartlett
    • 2
  • Stephen N. Elliott
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute for Learning Sciences & Teacher EducationAustralian Catholic UniversityBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of Education & ArtsAustralian Catholic UniversityVirginiaAustralia
  3. 3.Sanford School of Social and Family DynamicsArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations