Advertisement

Customer Expectations at the Urban Bottom of Pyramid in India: A Grounded Theory Approach

  • Ritu Srivastava
Chapter

Abstract

The Bottom of the Pyramid (BOP) typically refers to the low-income group of customers, which is a big segment in India. The marketing discipline has historically developed through the context of the industrialized or developed world, but given the size and unique characteristics of this segment of consumers, an independent approach is needed wherein the customers are understood within their context, and businesses strive to serve them and earn their profits. Because the customers are typically impoverished and there are certain assumptions that a marketer holds about this segment, there is a gap in crafting and delivering products and services for this segment that stops at exploring the sector’s profit potential. This study explores the customers in this segment with a view to understand what ultimately satisfies them and gives them happiness in their purchases. There are some interesting findings that emerge and a substantive theory that unfolds in the study.

References

  1. Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  2. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among the five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Dawar, N., & Chattopadhyay, A. (2000, June). Rethinking marketing programs for emerging markets. Working Paper Number 320, INSEAD, Fontainebleau.Google Scholar
  5. Dey, I. (1999). Grounding grounded theory: Guidelines for qualitative inquiry. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Drucker, P. (1958, January). Marketing and economic development. Journal of Marketing, 22, 252–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fisk, R. P., et al. (2016). Billions of impoverished people deserve to be better served: A call to action for the service research community. Journal of Service Management, 27(1), 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gebauer, H., & Reynoso, J. (2013). An agenda for service research at the base of the pyramid. Journal of Service Management, 24(5), 482–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.Google Scholar
  10. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  11. Gronroos, C. (2001). The perceived service quality concept – A mistake? Managing Service Quality, 11(3), 150–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ireland, J. (2008). Lessons for successful BOP marketing from Caracas’ slums. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(7), 430–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Karnani, A. (2007, April). Mirage at the bottom of the pyramid: How the private sector can help alleviate poverty. Working Paper, The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  14. Kolk, A., Rivera-Santos, M., & Ruffin, C. (2014). Reviewing a decade of research on the ‘base/bottom of the pyramid’ (BOP) concept. Business & Society, 53(3), 338–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mahajan, V., Pratini de Moraes, M. V., & Wind, J. (2000). The invisible global market. Marketing Management, (Winter), 31–35.Google Scholar
  16. Orlikowski, W. J., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Prahalad, C. K. (2004). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Prahalad, C. K., & Hart, S. L. (2002). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Strategy + Business, Issue 26, 1–14.Google Scholar
  19. Sheth, J. N. (2011, July). Impact of emerging markets on marketing: Rethinking existing perspectives and practices. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 166–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research, design and methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1993). The nature and determinants of customer expectations of service. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21(Winter), 1–12. Retrieved from https://usf.vc/resources/defining-base-of-the-economic-pyramid-in-india/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zeithaml, V. A., & Bitner, M. J. (2001). Services marketing: Integrating customer focus across the firm (2nd ed.). Boston: Tata McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Management Development InstituteGurgaonIndia

Personalised recommendations