Advertisement

Impact of Ownership Structure and Corporate Governance on Capital Structure of Nepalese Listed Companies

  • Raj Kumar Bajagai
  • Ravi Kumar Keshari
  • Pratikshya Bhetwal
  • Radhe Shyam Sah
  • Rajnish Nath Jha
Chapter

Abstract

This study examines the impact of ownership structure and corporate governance on capital structure of Nepalese listed companies. It shows that board composition and CEO duality have a positive relationship with the capital structure of Nepalese companies indicating that higher the board composition and CEO duality, higher would be the leverage and long term debts to total assets. Likewise, women directors and number of board members have positive relationship with capital structure variables which reveals that higher the number of women directors and number of board members, higher would be the leverage and long term debts to total assets. The result also shows that institutional shareholding and managerial shareholding have positive relationship with capital structure variables. Similarly, size, age and return on assets also have positive relationship with capital structure variables. This indicates that higher the size, age and return on assets, higher would be the leverage and long term debts to total assets. However, board size has negative relationship with capital structure variables. This reveals that higher the board size, lower would be the leverage and long term debts. The regression result reveals that beta coefficients for board composition and women directors have positive and significant impact on capital structure of Nepalese listed companies. The result also shows the positive and significant impact of board meeting and managerial shareholding on capital structure. Likewise, firm size, age of the firm and return on assets also have positive and significant impact on capital structure of Nepalese listed companies.

References

  1. Abobakr, G. M., & Elgiziry, K. (2015). The effect of board characteristics and ownership structure on the corporate financial leverage. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 5(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  2. Abor, J. Y., & Biekpe, N. (2004). Does corporate governance affect the capital structure decisions of Ghanaian SMEs? International Journal of Business in Society, 4(1), 21–27.Google Scholar
  3. Adams, B. R., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(1), 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahmad, N., & Aris, B. W. (2015). Does age of the firm determine capital structure decision? Evidence from Malaysian trading and services sector. International Business Management, 9(3), 200–207.Google Scholar
  5. Alvas, F. P., Berger, C. E., & Paulo, F. (2014). Board of director’s composition and capital structure. Research in International Business and Finance, 35(2015), 1–32.Google Scholar
  6. Berger, P. G., Ofek, E., & Yermack, D. L. (1997). Managerial entrenchment and capital structure decisions. The Journal of Finance, 52(4), 1411–1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhaduri, S. N. (2002). Determinants of corporate borrowing: Some evidence from the Indian corporate structure. Journal of Economics and Finance, 26(2), 200–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boodhoo, R. (2009). Capital structure and ownership structure: A review of literature. The Journal of Online Education, 4(5), 65–70.Google Scholar
  9. Butt, S. A., & Hasan, A. (2009). Impact of ownership structure and corporate structure on capital structure of Pakistani listed companies. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(2), 50–57.Google Scholar
  10. Cadbury, A. (1992). Report of the committee on the financial aspects of corporate governance. London Gee Publishing, 7(4), 24–50.Google Scholar
  11. Carcello, J. V., Neal, R. A., Riley, R. A., & Hermanson, D. R. (2002). Board characteristics and audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(2), 365–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dalton, M. C., & Dan, R. D. (2005). Board of directors: Utilizing empirical evidence in developing practical prescription. British Journal of Management, 16(1), 91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Devinaga, R. (2010). Theoretical framework of profitability as applied to commercial banks in Malaysia. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 19(4), 74–88.Google Scholar
  14. Drobetz, W., & Fix, R. (2003). What are the determinants of the capital structure? Some evidence for Switzerland. Journal of Business, 5(6), 75–88.Google Scholar
  15. Emamgholipour, M., Ramezani, A., Behzadnia, Z., & Rekabdarkolaei, E. A. (2013). The effect of CEO duality on the capital structure: Evidence from the Tehran stock exchange. International Journal of Basic Sciences and Applied Research, 2(4), 332–336.Google Scholar
  16. Finch, E. M., & Shivdasani, A. (2006). Are busy boards effective monitors. Journal of Finance, 51(2), 689–724.Google Scholar
  17. Fosberg, R. H. (2004). Agency problems and debt financing: Leadership structure effects, corporate governance. The International Journal of Business in Society, 4(1), 31–38.Google Scholar
  18. Friend, I., & Lang, L. H. (1988). An empirical test of the impact of managerial self-interest on corporate capital structure. The Journal of Finance, 43(2), 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heng, T. B., & Azrbaijani, S. (2012). Board of directors and capital structure: Evidence from leading Malaysian companies. Journal of Asian Social Science, 8(3), 123–136.Google Scholar
  20. Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.Google Scholar
  21. Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control system. The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Joshi, A., Basel, A., Maskey, A., Khadka, B., & Pandey, B. (2016). Impact of corporate governance on firm performance in unstable economic and political environment in Nepal. Nepalese Journal of Business, 3(1), 15–25.Google Scholar
  23. Kajananthan, R. (2012). Effect of corporate governance on capital structure: Case of the Sri Lankan listed manufacturing companies. Journal of Arts, Science and Commerce, 3(4), 63–71.Google Scholar
  24. Karamanou, I., & Vafeas, N. (2005). The association between boards, audit committees, and management earnings forecasts: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(3), 453–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krivogorky, V. (2006). Ownership, board structure and performance in continental Europe. The International Journal of Accounting, 4(1), 176–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kyereboah-Coleman, A. (2007). Corporate governance and firm performance in Africa: A dynamic panel data analysis. Paper presented at the international conference on corporate governance in emerging market, Sabanci University, Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
  27. Lang, W., & Jagtiani, J. (2010). The mortgage financial crises: The role of credit risk management and corporate governance. Atlantic Economic Journal, 38(3), 295–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. W. (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. The Business Lawyer, 4(1), 59–77.Google Scholar
  29. Lubatkin, M., & Chatterjee, S. (1994). Extending modern portfolio theory into the domain of corporate diversification: Does it apply? Academy of Management Journal, 3(7), 109–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marsh, P. (1982). The choice between equity and debt: An empirical study. The Journal of Finance, 37(1), 121–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Melvin, C., & Hirt, H. (2005). Corporate governance and performance: A brief review and assessment of the evidence for a link between corporate governance and performance. Journal of Business and Finance, 8(6), 269–278.Google Scholar
  32. Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American Economic Review, 4(8), 261–297.Google Scholar
  33. Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decision when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nyamweya, S. A. (2015). Relationship between the board of directors’ characteristics and the capital structures of companies listed in Nairobi securities exchange. Journal of Business and Management, 17(2), 104–109.Google Scholar
  35. Owusu, A., Agyei, K., & Richard, A. (2014). The effect of ownership structure and corporate governance on capital structure of Ghanaian listed manufacturing companies. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 4(1), 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pandey, P. (2014). Determinants of capital structure in Nepal. Nepalese Journal of Management, 1(4), 74–77.Google Scholar
  37. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organisations: A resource-dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  38. Pradhan, R. S. (2014). Corporate governance and bank performance in Nepal. Journal of Management and Development Economics, 3(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  39. Rafael, P. L., Pfeffer, F. L., & Sheleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rai, P., Ojha, P., Singh, P., Gyawali, R., & Gupta, R. (2015). Corporate governance and bank performance: Empirical evidence from Nepal. Nepalese Journal of Management, 2(2), 94–104.Google Scholar
  41. Rehman, M. A. U., Rehman, R. U., & Raoof, A. (2010). Does corporate governance lead to achangein the capital structure? American Journal of Social and Management Sciences, 3(4), 63–71.Google Scholar
  42. Saleem, F., & Rafique, B. (2013). The determination of capital structure of a gas firms listed on Karachi stock exchange in Pakistan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 9(2), 225–235.Google Scholar
  43. Sharma, G., Pant, M., & Thapa, N. (2014). Role of corporate governance on bank performance: A case of Nepalese banks. Nepalese Journal of Corporate Governance, 1(1), 15–26.Google Scholar
  44. Short, H., Wen, Z. H., & Keasey, P. (2002). The link between dividend policy and institutional ownership. Journal of Corporate Finance, 8(5), 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thagunna, K. S., & Poudel, S. (2013). Measuring bank performance of Nepali banks: A data envelopment analysis (DEA). International Journals of Economis and Financial, 3(1), 54–65.Google Scholar
  46. Thapa, P. J., Gurung, P., Shrestha, R., Kshetri, R. R., & Shrestha, R. (2016). Impact of board characteristics on firm’s performance: A case of Nepalese commercial banks. Nepalese Journal of Business, 1(3), 124–134.Google Scholar
  47. Titman, S., & Wessels, R. (1988). The determinants of capital structure choice. The Journal of Finance, 4(3), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wen, Y., Rwegasira, K., & Bilderbeek, J. (2002). Corporate governance and capital structure decisions of the Chinese listed firms. An International Review, 10(2), 75–83.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raj Kumar Bajagai
    • 1
  • Ravi Kumar Keshari
    • 1
  • Pratikshya Bhetwal
    • 1
  • Radhe Shyam Sah
    • 1
  • Rajnish Nath Jha
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Management, Uniglobe CollegeThribhuvan UniversityKathmanduNepal

Personalised recommendations