Advertisement

High|Bombastic: Adaptive Skin Conceptual Prototype for Mediterranean Climate

  • Omid Bakhshaei
  • Giuseppe Ridolfi
  • Arman Saberi
Chapter
Part of the Innovative Renewable Energy book series (INREE)

Abstract

High|Bombastic is part of a research on Living Building Envelopes still in progress at Mailab, a research center active for 7 years at the University of Florence on Multimedia, Architecture, and Interaction.

High|Bombastic identifies the development of a naturally ventilated double-skin adaptive envelope.

This paper will present the results of the first phase dedicated to the definition and the realization of its conceptual prototype involving dynamic components and materiality speculation.

Keywords

Double-skin façade Active façade Passive façade Double envelope Double-skin curtain wall Supply-air window Ventilated façade Multiple-skin façade Robotic façade 

References

  1. 1.
    AIA (2013) An architect’s guide to integrating energy modeling in the design process. The American Institute of Architecture. https://www.aia.org/resources/8056-architects-guide-to-integrating-energy-modeli v: 2016
  2. 2.
    Beesley P, Khan O, Stacey M (2013) Interactive tensegrity structure. In: ACADIA 2013 adaptive architecture, proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the association for computer aided design in architecture. Riverside Architectural Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Musa BT (2016) Evaluating the Use of double-skin facade systems for sustainable development. Department of Architecture, Eastern Mediterranean University, GazimagusaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Compagno A (2002) Intelligent glass facades., (5th revised and updated edition). Birkhäuser, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Michael D (1981) A wall for all season. Riba J 88(2), 135–139Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Faist AP (1998) Double skin walls. Institut de technique du batiment. Department d’Architecture. École Polytechnique Fédéral de Lausanne (EPFL), LausanneGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Behnaz FB (2016) Alloplastic architecture. In: Fox M (ed) Interactive architecture. Princeton Architectural Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Russel F, Charles LD (2014) Kinetic architecture: design for active envelopes. The Images Publishing Group, MulgraveGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thomas H, Norbert K, Michael V (eds) (1996) Solar energy in architecture and urban planning. In: Proceedings European conference on solar energy in architecture and urban planning, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jaeggi A (1998) Fagus. Industriekultur zwisschen Werkbund und Bauhaus, Werlagsbüro, Berlin, tr. E. M. Schwaiger, Fagus. Industrial culture from Werkbund to Bauhaus, Princeton Architectural Press, New York, 2000Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kragh M (2000) Building envelopes and environmental systems. In: Modern façades of office buildings, proceedings. Delft Technical University, DelftGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kroner MW (1997) An intelligent and responsive architecture in automation in construction, vol 6. Elsevier, pp 5–6. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926580597000174 v:jun 2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Salford K (1993) Soft systems. In: Lab C (ed) Brian boigonm. Princeton Architecture Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Eleanor Lee (2006) High performance commercial building facades, California energy commission building technologies program. Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Charles LD (2014) Ancestors of the kinetik facade. In: Russel F, Charles LD (eds) Kinetic architecture: design for active envelopes. The Images Publishing Group, Victoria, p 2014Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Loncour X, Deneyer A, Blasco M, Flamant G, Wouters P (2004) Ventilated doubel facades. Classification & illustrations of facade concepts. Belgian Building Research Institute. Department of Building Physics, Indoor Climate & Building Services, BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moe K (2014) Insulating modernism. Isolated and non-isolated thermodynamics in architecture. Birkhäuser Verlag, BaselGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jadhav NY (2016) Green and smart buildings. Advanced technology options. Energy Research Institute Nanyang Technological University Singapore, Springer, SingaporeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oesterle E, Lieb R-D, Lutz M, Heusler W (2001) Double skin. Prestel, Munich/London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Papert S (1996) A word for learning. In: Kafai Y, Resnick M (eds) Constructionism in practice: designing, thinking and learning in a digital world. Lawrence Erlbaum Association, MahwahGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Parkin S (2004) A description of a ventilated double-skin façade classification. In: International conference on building envelope systems &technology, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    John P, Maurya MC (2000) The challenge of green building in Asia. Arup Facade Engineering, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Poirazis H (2004) Double skin façades for office buildings. Department of Construction and Architecture, Division of Energy and Building Design. Lund University, Lund Institute of Technology, LundGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Di Pongratz C, Rita PM (2000) Natural born caadesigners: young American architects. Birkhäuser, BasileaGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    READ (1996) European charter for solar energy on architecture and urban planning, proceedings, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ritter A (2007) Smart materials in architecture, interior architecture and design. Birkhauser, BaselGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stec W, van Paassen AHC (2000) Integration of the double skin façade with the buildings, energy in built environment. Energy Technology, TU DelftGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Streicher Wolfang (2005) Best practice for double skin façades, WP 1 Report “State of the Art” EIE/04/135/S07.38652Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sullivan CC, Barbara H (2011) Energy performance starts at the building envelope. In: Building design+construction. https://www.bdcnetwork.com/energy-performance-starts-building-envelope. v: 2016Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tachi T, Epps G (2011) Designing One_DOF mechanism for architecture by rationalizing curved folding. In: Algorithmic design for architecture and urban design, proceedings of the international symposium on algorithmic design for architecture and urban design, Tokyo, pp 14–16Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wigginton M, Jude H (2002) Intelligent skins. Butterworth-Heineann, Oxford, MAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Omid Bakhshaei
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Ridolfi
    • 2
  • Arman Saberi
    • 2
  1. 1.Novin Tarh StudioTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Architecture (DIDA)Università degli Studi di FirenzeFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations