Complete Robotic Systems for the IROS Grasping and Manipulation Challenge

  • Eadom Dessalene
  • Daniel LofaroEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 816)


Advances in perception, motion planning and grasping algorithms have enabled the movement from pick-and-place robots incapable of handling disturbances in the environment to intelligent robots with manipulation algorithms capable of dealing with novel surroundings. While the tasks outlined by the IROS Grasping and Manipulation Challenge included many challenging tasks (some of which surpassed current progress in robotic manipulation), assumptions about the competition environment were allowed. With these assumptions, we present our vision on two full robotic system pipelines behind the autonomous basket picking and task completion components of the IROS Grasping and Manipulation Competition.


  1. 1.
    Jain, S., Farshchiansadegh, A., Broad, A., Abdollahi, F., Mussa-Ivaldi, F., Argall, B.: Assistive robotic manipulation through shared autonomy and a body-machine interface. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), pp. 526–531. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kappler, D., Bohg, J., Schaal, S.:. Leveraging big data for grasp planning. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 4304–4311. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Redmon, J., Angelova, A.: Real-time grasp detection using convolutional neural networks. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 1316–1322. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eppner, C., Deimel, R., Álvarez-Ruiz, J., Maertens, M., Brock, O.: Exploitation of environmental constraints in human and robotic grasping. Int. J. Robot. Res. (2015).
  5. 5.
    Dang, H., Allen, P.K.: Semantic grasping: planning robotic grasps functionally suitable for an object manipulation task. In: 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1311–1317. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kavraki, L.E., Svestka, P., Latombe, J.-C., Overmars, M.H.: Probabilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional configuration spaces. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 12(4), 566–580 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    LaValle, S.M.: Rapidly-exploring random trees: a new tool for path planning (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Billard, A., Grollman, D.: Robot learning by demonstration. Scholarpedia 8(12), 3824 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fiala, M.: ARTag, a fiducial marker system using digital techniques. In: 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2005), vol. 2, pp. 590–596. IEEE (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Argall, B.D., Chernova, S., Veloso, M., Browning, B.: A survey of robot learning from demonstration. Robot. Auton. Syst. 57(5), 469–483 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ijspeert, A.J., Nakanishi, J., Hoffmann, H., Pastor, P., Schaal, S.: Dynamical movement primitives: learning attractor models for motor behaviors. Neural Comput. 25(2), 328–373 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.George Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations