• Mary EvansEmail author
  • Sarah Moore
  • Hazel Johnstone


This body of fiction raises further ethical questions about the nature of justice. Post-1970s detective fiction’s revival of torture as a means of extracting the truth and vigilantism as a means of enacting justice means that where contemporary detective fiction allows us the catharsis of apprehending a murderer, it is generally through his violent undoing, rather than arrest. This is partly because, in the world of post-1970s detective fiction, the law and its guardians are often unscrupulous and untrustworthy. Under these circumstances, arrest offers no guarantee that justice will be done. It’s a concern that extends beyond the detective novel.


  1. Alexander, J. 2003. The Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauman, Zygmunt. 2007. Consuming Life. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  3. Bazin, Andre. 1971/2004. The Western, or the American Film Par Excellence. In What Is Cinema? Vol. I, ed. and trans. Gray. Berkeley: University of California Press. Available at: Accessed 14 May 2018.
  4. Bergstein, Mary. 2006. Freud’s Moses of Michelangelo: Vasari, Photography, and Art Historical Practice. The Art Bulletin 88 (1): 158–176. Available at: Accessed 14 May 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boltanski, Luc. 2014. Mysteries and Conspiracies: Detective Stories, Spy Novels and the Making of Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, Pierre. 2010 (originally 1979). Distinction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Brecht, Bertolt, Martin Harvey, and Aaron Kelly. 2004. On the Popularity of the Crime Novel. The Irish Review 31 (Spring/Summer): 90–95.Google Scholar
  8. Burrows, R., and M. Savage. 2014. After the Crisis? Big Data and the Methodological Challenges of Empirical Sociology. Sociology (April–June): 1–6.Google Scholar
  9. Donaldson, Lucy F. 2014. Texture in Film. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Foucault, Michel. 1998a. The History of Sexuality: The Will to Knowledge, vol. 1. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  11. Foucault, Michel. 1998b. The History of Sexuality: The Use of Pleasure, vol. 2. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  12. Freud, Sigmund. 1914. The Moses of Michelangelo. In Freud, The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works, vol. 13, ed. James Strachey, 211–236. London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis.Google Scholar
  13. Frisby, David. 1992. Between the Spheres: Siegfried Krakauer and the Detective Novel. Theory Culture, Society 9 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goffman, Erving. 1990 (originally 1956). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  15. HMIC. 2014a. Rape Monitoring Group: Local Area Data for 2013/14. London: HMSO. Available at: Accessed 13 May 2018.
  16. HMIC. 2014b. Crime Recording: Making the Victim Count. London: HMSO. Available at: Accessed 13 May 2018.
  17. Lovett, Jo, and Liz, Kelly. 2009. Different Systems, Similar Outcomes? Tracking Attrition in Reported Rape Cases Across Europe. London: Child and Women Abuse Studies Unit.Google Scholar
  18. McLennan, Gregor. 2005. The New American Cultural Sociology: An Appraisal. Theory, Culture & Society 22 (6): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Savage, Mike, and Roger Burrows. 2007. The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology. Sociology 41 (5): 885–899. Available at: Accessed 13 May 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schutz, Alfred. 1972 (originally 1932). The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston,USA: Northwest University Press.Google Scholar
  21. The Guardian. 25 July 2009. Senior Economists Sent Her a Letter to Explain the Oversight.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Gender StudiesLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Social & Policy SciencesUniversity of BathBathUK

Personalised recommendations