Truncal Blocks: Rectus Sheath Catheters

  • Anton KrigeEmail author
  • Mark Daugherty


Successful enhanced recovery after surgery relies on early mobilisation and nutrition. The former relies on effective analgesia, which also indirectly affects the latter. Effective analgesia is a primary technique which when combined with maximal multimodal analgesia, provides adequate pain relief without motor blockade, urinary retention and hypotension whilst avoiding high dose systemic opiate, and its antecedent side effects. Other attributes required for widespread application of a technique are safety, lack of cumbersome attachments, minimal contraindications and ease of deployment and training. The resurgence of the forgotten technique of rectus sheath blockade, improved by the recent ability to prolong the block by bilateral catheter insertion in the rectus sheath space, may satisfy all the requirements of effective analgesia for patients undergoing open midline abdominal surgery.

These catheters can be placed prior to surgery under ultrasound guidance or directly by the surgeon. Furthermore, they may also be placed postoperatively under ultrasound guidance on the intensive care unit prior to waking patients who have been ventilated following emergency surgery.

This chapter will describe this attractive alternative for open abdominal surgery performed via median or paramedian incisions in greater detail.


Rectus sheath Rectus sheath block RSB Rectus sheath catheters RSC Laparotomy Major abdominal surgery Open midline incisions Ultrasound-guided RSC Surgically placed RSC Truncal blocks 


  1. 1.
    Wilmore D, Kehlet H. Management of patients in fast track surgery. BMJ. 2001;322:473–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schleich CL. Schmerzlose operationen. Berlin: Springer; 1899. p. 240–1.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith BE, Suchak M, Siggins D, Challands J. Rectus sheath block for diagnostic laparoscopy. Anaesthesia. 1988;43(11):947–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ferguson S, Thomas V, Lewis I. The rectus sheath block in paediatric anaesthesia: new indications for an old technique? Paediatr Anaesth. 1996;6(6):463–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yentis S, Hills-Wright P. Development and evaluation of combined rectus sheath and ilioinguinal blocks for abdominal gynaecological surgery. Anaesthesia. 1999;54:466–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Azemati S, Khosravi MB. An assessment of the value of rectus sheath block for postlaparoscopic pain in gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12(1):12–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Isaac LA, McEwen J, Hayes JA, Crawford MW. A pilot study of the rectus sheath block for pain control after umbilical hernia repair. Pediatr Anesth. 2006;16:406–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Su S, Harris P. A randomised, placebo-controlled trial of continuous local anaesthetic rectus sheath infusion for pain management after major abdominal surgery [abstract]. ANZ J Surg. 2006;76:A16.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Willschke H, Bosenberg A, Marhofer P, Johnston S, Kettner SC, Wanzel O, et al. Ultrasonography-guided rectus sheath block in paediatric anaesthesia—a new approach to an old technique. Br J Anaesth. 2006;97(2):244–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dolan J, Lucie P, Geary T, Smith M, Kenny G. The rectus sheath block for laparoscopic surgery in adults: a comparison between the loss of resistance and ultrasound guided techniques. Anaesthesia. 2007;62:302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cornish P, Deacon A. Rectus sheath catheters for continuous analgesia after upper abdominal surgery. ANZ J Surg. 2007;77(12):84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sandeman DJ, Dilley AV. Ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block and catheter placement. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78:621–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Watson D, Farquhar XX, Dennison A, Cole J, McAllister S. Postoperative analgesia by infusion of local anaesthetic into the rectus sheath. Br J Anaesth. 1991;67:656.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bashandy GMN, Elkholy AHH. Guided rectus sheath block to multimodal analgesia for abdominal cancer surgery with midline incision. Anesth Pain Med. 2014;4(3):e18263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Padmanabhan J, Rohatgi A, Niaz A, Chojnowska E, Baig K, Woods WGA. Does rectus sheath infusion of bupivacaine reduce postoperative opioid requirement? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007;89:229–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boyd N, Grice A, Jubb A. Audit of rectus sheath catheters at the Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust. Presented at the Society of Anaesthetists of the South Western Region meeting, Oct 2009.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dutton TJ, McGrath JS, Daugherty MO. Use of rectus sheath catheters for pain relief in patients undergoing major pelvic urological surgery. Br J Urol Int. 2014;113(2):246–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Webster K, Hubble S. Rectus sheath analgesia in intensive care patients: technique description and case series [abstract]. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009;37:855.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shido A, Imamachi N, Doi K, Sakura S, Saito Y. Continuous local anesthetic infusion through ultrasound-guided rectus sheath catheters. Can J Anaesth. 2010;57(11):1046–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Malchow R, Jaeger L, Lam H. Rectus sheath catheters for continuous analgesia after laparotomy – without postoperative opioid use. Pain Med. 2011;12(7):1124–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bakshi S, Mapari A, Paliwal R. Ultrasound-guided rectus sheath catheters: a feasible and effective, opioid-sparing, post-operative pain management technique: a case series. Indian J Anaesth. 2015;59(2):118–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Parsons B, Aning J, Daugherty M, et al. The use of rectus sheath catheters for patients undergoing radical cystectomy. BJU Int. 2011;4:24–30.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Godden AR, Marshall MJ, Grice AS, Daniels IR. Ultrasonography guided rectus sheath catheters versus epidural analgesia for open colorectal cancer surgery in a single centre. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013;95(8):591–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Finch L, Phillips A, Acheson N, Dix P, Berry C. An evaluation of the effects of a service change from epidurals to rectus sheath catheters on postoperative pain. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;33(5):502–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tudor ECG, Yang W, Brown R, Mackey PM. Rectus sheath catheters provide equivalent analgesia to epidurals following laparotomy for colorectal surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2015;97(7):530–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yassin HM, Elmoneim ATA, El Moutaz H. The analgesic efficiency of ultrasound-guided rectus sheath analgesia compared with low thoracic epidural analgesia after elective abdominal surgery with a midline incision: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2017;7(3):e14244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Seidel R, Wree A, Schulze M. Does the approach influence the success rate for ultrasound-guided rectus sheath blocks? An anatomical case series. Local Reg Anesth. 2017;10:61–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wilkinson KM, Krige A, Brearley SG, Lane S, Scott M, Gordon AC, et al. Thoracic epidural analgesia versus rectus sheath catheters for open midline incisions in major abdominal surgery within an enhanced recovery programme (TERSC): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials J. 2014;15(1):1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dowidar AERM, Ezz HAA, Shama AAE, Eloraby MA. Postoperative analgesia of ultrasound guided rectus sheath catheters versus continuous wound catheters for colorectal surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Egypt J Anaesth. 2016;32(3):375–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shabana A, Dar M, Ghanem MA. Surgically performed rectus sheath block – effect of morphine added to bupivacaine versus bupivacaine only: a prospective randomized controlled double blinded trial. Egypt J Anaesth. 2013;29:401–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rozen WM, Tean TMN, Ashton MW, Barrington MJ IV, Anusic MJ, Taylor GI. Refining the course of the thoracolumbar nerves: a new understanding of the innervation of the anterior abdominal wall. Clin Anat. 2008;21:325–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    McDermott F, Wilson L, Boorman P. Surgically placed rectus sheath catheters. Update Anaesth. 2010;26:9–11.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wada M, Kitayama M, Hashimoto H, et al. Plasma ropivacaine concentrations after ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg. 2012;114:230–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Griffiths JD, Barron FA, Grant S, Bjorksten AR, Hebbard P, Royse CF. Plasma ropivacaine concentrations after ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105(6):853–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Griffiths JD, Le NV, Grant S, Bjorksten A, Hebbard P, Royse C. Symptomatic local anaesthetic toxicity and plasma ropivacaine concentrations after transversus abdominis plane block for Caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 2013;110(6):996–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chakraborty A, Khemka R, Datta T. Ultrasound‐guided truncal blocks: A new frontier in regional anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth. 2016;60:703–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

  1. Webster K. Ultrasound guided rectus sheath block. Update Anaesth. 2010;26:12–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anaesthesia and Critical CareRoyal Blackburn Teaching HospitalBlackburnUK
  2. 2.Department of AnaesthesiaRoyal Devon and Exeter HospitalsExeterUK

Personalised recommendations