Overcoming Conflicts in ICU Care of Surgical Patients

  • Anthony Dinallo
  • Jonathan Decker
  • Adam M. KopelanEmail author


Surgical patients requiring postoperative admission to the intensive care unit often necessitate a large team of physicians to work together toward assuring their recovery. It has been well documented in the literature that these types of patients are better served by a closed-model ICU, wherein their primary physician is an intensivist and the operative surgeon is a consultant. This effective model, however, is not flawless and requires patience, conflict management skills, and open-mindedness on behalf of the surgeon and intensivist. Failures in communication are a leading cause of medical error, and for this reason it is imperative that surgeons distribute information to the entire care team and intensivists must effectively coordinate the care and manage the patient. The highlighted case of a 63-year-old African American gentleman who underwent repair of his ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and serial surgeries to manage his complicated postoperative course illustrates how patient outcomes are affected by communication between the surgeon and intensivist and the coordination of multiple services in a closed-model ICU.


Surgeon Intensivist Intensive care unit Communication Conflict Emotional intelligence 


  1. 1.
    Cassell J, Buchman TG, Streat S, Stewart RM. Surgeons, intensivists, and the covenant of care: administrative models and values affecting care at the end of life–updated. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(5):1551–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shanafelt TD, Balch CM, Dyrbye L, et al. Special report: suicidal ideation among American surgeons. Arch Surg. 2011;146(1):54–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shanafelt TD, Balch CM, Bechamps G, et al. Burnout and medical errors among American surgeons. Ann Surg. 2010;251(6):995–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schwarze ML, Redmann AJ, Brasel KJ, Alexander GC. The role of surgeon error in withdrawal of postoperative life support. Ann Surg. 2012;256(1):10–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Proctor ML, Pasotre Jm Gerstle JT, et al. Incidence of medical error and adverse outcomes on a pediatric general surgery service. J Pediatr Surg. 2003;38:1361–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Haller G, Myles PS, Taffé P, et al. Rate of undesirable events at beginning of academic year: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2009;339:b3974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reader T, Flin R, Lauche K, et al. Non-technical skills in the intensive care unit. Br J Anaesth. 2006;96:551–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reader TW, Flin R, Cuthbertson BH. Communication skills and error in the intensive care unit. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007;13:732–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sur MD, Angelos P. Ethical issues in surgical critical care: the complexity of interpersonal relationships in the surgical intensive care unit. J Intensive Care Med. 2016;31:442–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Luchette FA. Surgical critical care workforce – are all intensivists created equal? JAMA Surg. 2013;148:674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hass B, et al. “It’s parallel universes”: an analysis of communication between surgeons and intensivists. Crit Care Med. 2015;43:2147–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee J, Eng B, Iqbal S, et al. Medicine versus surgery/anesthesiology intensivists: a retrospective review and comparison of outcomes in a mixed medical-surgical-trauma ICU. Can J Surg. 2013;56:275–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sarani B, Toevs C, Mayglothling J, et al. The burden of the U.S. crisis in the surgical critical care workforce and workflow. Am Surg. 2015;81:19–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nathens AB, Rivara FP, MacKenzie EJ, et al. The impact of an intensivist-model ICU on trauma-related mortality. Ann Surg. 2006;244(4):545–54.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Matsushima K, Goldwasser ER, Schaefer EW, et al. The impact of intensivists’ base specialty of training on care process and outcomes of critically ill trauma patients. J Surg Res. 2013;184:577–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chow A, Mayer EK, Darzi AW, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures: the importance of patient satisfaction in surgery. Surgery. 2009;146:435–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Penkoske PA, Buchman TG. The relationships between the surgeon and the intensivist in the surgical intensive care unit. Surg Clin North Am. 2006;86:1351–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Buchman TG, Cassell J, Ray SE, et al. Who should manage the dying patient? Rescue, shame, and the surgical ICU dilemma. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;194:665–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Procaccini DE, Connors C. Emotional intelligence in critical care medicine. Archives 1 Feb 2015; Webpage.
  20. 20.
    Gasperino J. The leapfrog initiative for intensive care unit staffing and its impact on intensive care unit performance: a review. Health Policy. 2011;102:223–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Diringer MN, Edwards DF. Admission to a neurologic/neurosurgical intensive care unit is associated with reduced mortality after intracerebral hemorrhage. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:635–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony Dinallo
    • 1
  • Jonathan Decker
    • 1
  • Adam M. Kopelan
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Newark Beth Israel Medical CenterNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations