Conclusions and Reflections

  • Aileen O’Driscoll


The resurgence of a vibrant and active feminist movement has resulted in increasing social discourse and discussion around issues that affect the sexes, and particularly concerning the ways in which women and girls continue to be systematically oppressed, silenced, and marginalised. In Ireland, the preceding few years have witnessed a successful referendum to legislate for same-sex marriage, a far larger percentage than previous of Irish people indicating support for liberalising the country’s restrictive abortion laws, and the widely publicised and much supported grass-roots theatre-based and arts movement #WakingTheFeminists, which began life as a critical response to the Abbey Theatre’s lack of inclusion of women playwrights in its year-long ‘Waking the Nation’ programme. The similarities shared by these movements and campaigns echo a wider-world conversation that is, once again, turning attention to issues of women’s visibility, voice, equal rights, and representation. Considering the microcosm of the context examined in this book, calling advertisers to task for their portrayal and perpetuation of gender stereotypical advertising texts and imagery capitalises on that energy and implies a timely potential for change.


  1. Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine Domination. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Drumwright, M. E., & Murphy, P. E. (2004). How Advertising Practitioners View Ethics: Moral Muteness, Moral Myopia, and Moral Imagination. Journal of Advertising, 33(2), 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gill, R. (2007). Gender and the Media. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Gill, R. (2016). Post-Postfeminism?: New Feminist Visibilities in Postfeminist Times. Feminist Media Studies, 16(4), 610–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Goffman, E. (1979). Gender Advertisements. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Golombisky, K. (2003). Locating Diversity Within Advertising Excellence. Journal of Advertising Education, 7(2), 20–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hearn, J., & Hein, W. (2015). Reframing Gender and Feminist Knowledge Construction in Marketing and Consumer Research: Missing Feminisms and the Case of Men and Masculinities. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(15–16), 1626–1651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jhally, S. (2011). Image-Based Culture: Advertising and Popular Culture. In G. Dines & J. M. Humez (Eds.), Gender, Race, and Class in Media. A Critical Reader (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Kilbourne, J. (1999). Can’t Buy My Love: How Advertising Changes the Way We Think and Feel. New York/London: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  10. Lazar, M. M. (2006). Discover the Power of Femininity! Feminist Media Studies, 6(4), 505–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lazar, M. M. (2007). Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Articulating a Feminist Discourse Praxis. Critical Discourse Studies, 4(2), 141–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McRobbie, A. (2004). Post-Feminism and Popular Culture. Feminist Media Studies, 4(3), 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McRobbie, A. (2007). Top Girls? Young Women and the Post-Feminist Contract. Cultural Studies, 21(4–5), 718–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Peck, J. (2005). Struggling with the Creative Class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(4), 740–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rios, D. I. (2003). Diversity in Communication Education: The “D” Word is All About Including Others. Journal of Advertising Education, 7(2), 15–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Taylor, M., & O’Brien, D. (2017). ‘Culture Is a Meritocracy’: Why Creative Workers’ Attitudes May Reinforce Social Inequality. Sociological Research Online, 22(4), 1–21.Google Scholar
  17. Williamson, J. (1978). Decoding Advertisements: Ideology and Meaning in Advertising. London: Marion Boyars Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aileen O’Driscoll
    • 1
  1. 1.Dublin City UniversityDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations