Advertisement

Medial Fixed Bearing UKR: Technique and Tips

  • R. W. D. Pilling
  • C. J. Della Valle
  • N. J. London
Chapter

Abstract

Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) is an alternative to total knee replacement (TKR) in patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis confined to one compartment (Liddle AD, Pandit H, Judge A, Murray DW, Liddle AD, Mrcs DP, et al. Optimal usage of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 41 986 cases from the national joint registry for England and Wales. Bone Joint J [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2017 Aug 14];97:1506–11. Available from: http://bjj.boneandjoint.org.uk/content/jbjsbr/97-B/11/1506.full.pdf). Fixed bearing UKR has similar excellent outcomes and at least equivalent survivorship to the mobile-bearing implants without the risk of dislocation, allowing the surgeon to focus on balancing the gaps while ensuring slight under-correction. There are five key principles for performing fixed bearing UKR: (1) under-correction of limb alignment, (2) component to component alignment, (3) restoring tension to soft tissues, (4) posterior slope, and (5) component sizing. This technical guide describes the setup, exposure, tibial and femoral prep, and sizing and implanting technique plus technical tips based on the extensive experience of the senior authors, to ensure a reproducible result. Appropriate implant-specific training should be sought prior to undertaking UKR with an unfamiliar implant.

Keywords

Fixed bearing unicompartmental knee replacement Surgical technique Fixed bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Gap balancing Anteromedial osteoarthritis 

References

  1. 1.
    Liddle AD, Pandit H, Judge A, Murray DW, Liddle AD, Mrcs DP, et al. Optimal usage of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 41 986 cases from the national joint registry for England and Wales. Bone Joint J [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2017 Aug 14];97:1506–11. Available from: http://bjj.boneandjoint.org.uk/content/jbjsbr/97-B/11/1506.full.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown NM, Sheth NP, Davis K, Berend ME, Lombardi A V., Berend KR, et al. Total knee arthroplasty has higher postoperative morbidity than unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2012 Sep [cited 2017 Aug 10];27(8):86–90. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22560653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liddle AD, Judge A, Pandit H, Murray DW. Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101 330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Lancet [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2017 May 9];384:1437–45. Available from: http://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(14)60419-0.pdf CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zimmer B. Persona ™ partial knee instrument system surgical technique. 1st ed. Warsaw: Zimmer Biomet; 2017.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Parratte S, Pauly V, Aubaniac JM, Argenson JN. No long-term difference between fixed and mobile medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res [Internet]. Springer; 2012 Jan [cited 2017 Nov 24];470(1):61–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21732024.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. W. D. Pilling
    • 1
  • C. J. Della Valle
    • 2
  • N. J. London
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Harrogate & District NHS Foundation TrustHarrogateUK
  2. 2.Section of Adult Reconstruction, Rush University Medical CenterChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Leeds Beckett UniversityLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations