B-Model Gromov-Witten Theory pp 1-77 | Cite as

# Mirror Symmetry Constructions

## Abstract

Mirror symmetry, in general, is a correspondence between objects of a certain type (manifolds, for example, or polynomial functions) and objects of a possibly different type that exchanges the “A-model” of each object with the “B-model” of its image. This equivalence has many manifestations in both mathematics and physics, but in order to discuss any of them, one must first understand how mirror pairs are constructed. We review three such constructions—the Batyrev construction, the Hori–Vafa construction, and the Berglund–Hubsch–Krawitz constructions—and, in each case, describe the A-model and B-model state spaces that mirror symmetry interchanges.

## Notes

### Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mark Shoemaker for his detailed and valuable comments. Thanks are also due to Kentaro Hori for answering many of the authors’ questions, and to all of the students in the course on which these notes are based, without whom many corrections and clarifications would not have been made. The authors were partially supported by NSF RTG grant 1045119.

## References

- 1.Acosta, P.: Asymptotic expansion and the LG/(Fano, General Type) correspondence (2014). ArXiv preprint, arXiv:1411.4162Google Scholar
- 2.Adem, A., Leida, J., Ruan, Y.: Orbifolds and Stringy Topology, vol. 171. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Arnol’d, V.I.: Singularity Theory, vol. 53. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Batyrev, V.: Dual polyhedra and mirror symmetry for Calabi-Yau hypersurfaces. J. Algebraic Geom.
**3**, 493–535 (1994)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 5.Batyrev, V., Borisov, L.: On Calabi-Yau complete intersections in toric varieties. In: Andreatta, M., Peternell, T. (eds.) Higher-Dimensional Complex Varieties (Trento, 1994). Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (1996)Google Scholar
- 6.Berglund, P., Hübsch, T.: A generalized construction of mirror manifolds. Nucl. Phys. B
**393**, 377–391 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 7.Cannas da Silva, A.: Lectures on Symplectic Geometry. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1764. Springer, Berlin (2008)Google Scholar
- 8.Chen, W., Ruan, Y.: A new cohomology theory of orbifold. Commun. Math. Phys.
**248**(1), 1–31 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 9.Chiodo, A., Ruan, Y.: Landau–Ginzburg/Calabi–Yau correspondence for quintic three-folds via symplectic transformations. Invent. Math.
**182**(1), 117–165 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 10.Chiodo, A., Ruan, Y.: LG/CY correspondence: the state space isomorphism. Adv. Math.
**227**(6), 2157–2188 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 11.Chiodo, A., Iritani, H., Ruan, Y.: Landau-Ginzburg/Calabi-Yau correspondence, global mirror symmetry and Orlov equivalence. Publ. Math. IHÉS,
**119**, 1–90 (2012)zbMATHGoogle Scholar - 12.Clader, E.: Landau-Ginzburg/Calabi-Yau correspondence for the complete intersections
*X*_{3,3}and*X*_{2,2,2,2}(2013). ArXiv preprint, arXiv:1301.5530Google Scholar - 13.Clader, E., Ross, D.: Sigma models and phase transitions for complete intersections. Int. Math. Res. Not. (2015, in press). arXiv:1511.02027Google Scholar
- 14.Cox, D.A., Little, J.B., Schenck, H.K.: Toric Varieties. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Fan, H., Jarvis, T., Ruan, Y.: The Witten equation, mirror symmetry and quantum singularity theory. Ann. Math.
**178**, 1–106 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 16.Fulton, W.: Introduction to Toric Varieties. Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 131. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1993)Google Scholar
- 17.Givental, A.: Equivariant Gromov-Witten invariants. Int. Math. Res. Not.
**13**, 613–663 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 18.Givental, A.: A mirror theorem for toric complete intersections. In: Topological Field Theory, Primitive Forms, and Related Topics. Progress in Mathematics, vol. 160, pp. 141–175. Birkhäuser, Basel (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Gonzalez, E., Woodward, C.: Quantum cohomology and toric minimal model programs (2012). ArXiv preprint, arXiv:1207.3253Google Scholar
- 20.Hori, K., Vafa, C.: Mirror symmetry (2000). arXiv preprint hep-th/0002222Google Scholar
- 21.Hori, K., Katz, S., Pandharipande, R., Thomas, R., Vafa, C., Vakil, R., Zaslow, E.: Mirror Symmetry. American Mathematical Society/Clay Mathematics Institute, Peterborough (2003)Google Scholar
- 22.Iritani, H.: Convergence of quantum cohomology by quantum Lefschetz. J. Reine Angew. Math.
**610**, 29–69 (2007)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 23.Krawitz, M.: FJRW rings and Landau-Ginzburg mirror symmetry (2009). ArXiv preprint, arXiv:0906.0796Google Scholar
- 24.Kreuzer, M., Skarke, H.: On the classification of quasihomogeneous functions. Commun. Math. Phys.
**150**, 137–147 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 25.McDuff, D., Salamon, D.: Introduction to Symplectic Topology. Oxford Mathematical Monographs. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 26.Witten, E.: Phases of N = 2 theories in two dimensions. Nucl. Phys. B
**403**(1), 159–222 (1993)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar