Advertisement

Total Ankle Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Post-traumatic Arthritis

  • Dolfi HerscoviciJr.
  • Julia M. Scaduto
Chapter

Abstract

The use of total ankle replacement is a demanding procedure. Patient selection is important, and preoperative discussions should include a discussion of non-operative approaches and the use of other joint-sparing surgical approaches. Regardless of whether a two-component or three-component third-generation system is used equally, good outcomes can be expected. When the decision is made to use a TAR in patients with post-traumatic arthritis, patient positioning, surgical incision and dissection, tibial and talar preparation, positioning of the components, closure, and postoperative care are important points to consider in order to obtain good outcomes. With the use of good surgical techniques, current literature demonstrates good survivorship of TARs at 5 and 10 years.

Keywords

Ankle Arthroplasty Replacement Arthritis Anatomy Biomechanics Pathophysiology Evaluation Treatment options 

References

  1. 1.
    Glazebrook M, Daniels T, Younger A, Foote CJ, Penner M, Wing K, Lau J, Leighton R, Dunbar M. Comparison of health-related quality of life between patients with end-stage ankle and hip arthrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:499–505.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown TD, Johnson RC, Saltzman CL, Marsh JL, Buckwalter JA. Posttraumatic arthritis: a first estimate of incidence, prevalence, and burden of disease. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20:739–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hootman JM, Helmick CG. Projections of US prevalence of arthritis and associated activity limitations. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:226–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Muehleman C, Bareither D, Huck K, Cole AA, Keuttner KE. Prevalence of degenerative morphological changes in the joints of the lower extremity. Osteoarthr Cartil. 1997;1:23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stauffer R, Chae E, Brewster R. Force and motion analysis of the normal, diseased and prosthetic ankle joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977;127:189–1196.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stiehl JB. Anthropomorphic studies of the ankle joint. In: Stiehl JB, editor. Inman’s joints of the ankle. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1991. p. 1–6.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leardini A, O’Connor JJ, Catani F. A geometric model of the human ankle joint. J Biomech. 1999;32:63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Castro MD. Ankle biomechanics. Foot Ankle Clin. 2002;7:679–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kimizuka M, Kurosawa H, Fukabayashi T. Load-bearing pattern of the ankle joint. Contact area and pressure distribution. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1980;96:45–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aurich M, Squires GR, Reiner A, Mollenhauer JA, Kuettner KE, Poole AR, Cole AA. Deferential matrix degradation and turnover in early cartilage lesions of human knee and ankle joints. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:112–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Calhoun JH, Eng M, Li F, Ledbetter BR, Viegas SF. A comprehensive study of pressure distribution in the ankle joint with inversion and eversion. Foot Ankle. 1994;15:125–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen C-T, Bhargava M, Lin PM, Torzilli PA. Time, stress, and location dependent chondrocyte death and collagen damage in cyclically loaded articular cartilage. J Orthop Res. 2003;21:888–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Korhonen RK, Wong M, Arokoski J, Lindgren R, Helminen HJ, Hunziker EB, Jurvelin JS. Importance of the superficial tissue layer for the indentation stiffness of articular cartilage. Med Eng Phys. 2002;24:99–108.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Trickey WR, Vail TP, Guilak F. The role of the cytoskeleton in the viscoelastic properties of human articular chondrocytes. J Orthop Res. 2004;22:131–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sauter E, Buckwalter JA, McKinley TO, Martin JA. Cytoskeletal dissolution blocks oxidant release and cell death in injured cartilage. J Orthop Res. 2012;30:593–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shepherd DE, Seedhom BB. Thickness of human articular cartilage in joints of the lower limb. Ann Rheum Dis. 1999;58:27–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Simon WH, Friendenberg S, Richardson S. Joint congruence. A correlation of joint congruence and thickness of articular cartilage in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55:1614–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wynarsky GT, Greenwald AS. Mathematical model; of the human ankle joint. J Biomech. 1983;16:241–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kempson GE. Age-related changes in the tensile properties of human articular cartilage: a comparative study between the femoral head of the hip joint and the talus of the ankle joint. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991;1075:223–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cole AA, Chubinskaya S, Schumacher B, Huch K, Szabo G, Yao J, Mikecz K, Hasty KA, Kuettner KE. Chondrocyte matrix metalloproteinase-8. Human articular chondrocytes express neutrophils collagenase. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:11023–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hauselmann HJ, Fletchenmacher J, Michal L, Thonar EJ, Shinmei M, Keuttner KE, Aydelotte MB. The superficial layer of human articular cartilage is more susceptible to interleukin-1-induced damage than the deep layers. Arthritis Rheum. 1996;39:478488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ewers BJ, Dvoracek-Drisksna D, Orth MH, Haut RC. The extent of matrix damage and chondrocyte death in mechanically traumatized articular cartilage explants depends on rate of loading. J Orthop Res. 2001;19:779–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lucchinetti E, Torzilli P, Adams C, Horton WJ. Cartilage viability after repetitive loading: a preliminary report. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2001;10:71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lewis JL, Deloria LB, Oyen-Tiesma M, Thompson RC Jr, Ericson M, Oegema TR Jr. Cell death after cartilage impact around matrix cracks. J Orthop Res. 2003;21:881–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Torzilli PA, Grigiene R, Borrelli J, Helfet DL. Effect of impact load on articular cartilage: cell metabolism and viability, and matrix water content. J Biomech Eng. 1999;121:433–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Natoli RM, Scott CC, Athanasiou KA. Temporal effects of impact on articular cartilage cell death, gene expression, matrix biochemistry, and biomechanics. Ann Biomed Eng. 2008;36:780–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Saltzman CL, El-Khoury GY. The hindfoot alignment view. Foot Ankle Int. 1995;16:572–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lepojärvi S, Niinimäki J, Pakarinen H, Koskela L, Leskelä H-V. Rotational dynamics of the talus in a normal tibiotalar joint as shown by weight-bearing computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98:568–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Khoury NJ, El-Khoury GY, Saltzman CL, Brandser EA. Intraarticular foot and ankle injections to identify the source of pain before arthrodesis. Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167:669–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vasiliadis HS, Tsikopoulos K. Glucosamine and chondroitin for the treatment of osteoarthritis. World J Orthop. 2017;8:1–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Abate M, Schiavone C, Salini V. Hyaluronic acid in ankle arthritis: why evidence of efficacy is still lacking? Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012;30:277–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Xu S, Liu H, Xie Y, Sang L, Chen B. Effect of mesenchymal stromal cells for articular cartilage degeneration treatment: a meta-analysis. Cytotherapy. 2015;17:1342–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Repetto I, Biti B, Cerruti P, Trentini R, Felli L. Conservative treatment of ankle osteoarthritis: can platelet-rich plasma effectively postpone surgery? J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;56:362–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Muir DC, Amendola A, Saltzman CL. Forty-year outcome of ankle “cup” arthroplasty for post-traumatic arthritis. Iowa Orthop. 2002;22:99–102.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lord G, Marrotte JH. Total ankle replacement. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1980;66:527–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Valderrabano V, Pagenstert GI, Müller AM, Paul J, Henniger HB, Barg A. Mobile- and fixed-bearing total ankle prosthesis. Is there really a difference? Foot Ankle Clin N Am. 2012;17:565–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Barg A, Morris SC, Zhang C, Presson AP, Phisitkul P, Saltzman CL. Mobile- vs. fixed-bearing total ankle prostheses. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Poster presentation at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Annual Meeting. San Diego. 2017.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Trajkovski T, Pinsker E, Cadden A, Daniels T. Outcomes of ankle arthroplasty with preoperative coronal-plane varus deformity of 10° or greater. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:1382–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM, Loibl M, Huber M, Rippstein PF. Habitual physical activity and sports participation after total ankle arthroplasty. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:95–102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rodrigues-Pinto R, Muras J, Oliva XM, Amado P. Total ankle replacement in patients under the age of 50. Should the indications be revised? Foot and Ankle Surg. 2013;19:229–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Usuelli FG, Maccario C, D’Ambrosi R, Surface MF, Vulcano E. Age-related outcome of mobile-bearing total ankle replacement. Orthopedics. 2017;40:e567–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Raikin SM, Rasouli MR, Espander R, Maltenfort MG. Trends in treatment of advanced ankle arthropathy by total ankle replacement or ankle fusion. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35:216–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Pugely AJ, Amendola A, Callaghan JJ, Martin CT, Cram P. Trends in the use of total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis in the United States Medicare population. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35:207–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Singer S, Klejman S, Pinsker E, Houck J, Daniels T. Ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis: gait analysis compared with normal controls. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(24):e191(1–10).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Braito M, Dammerer D, Kaufman G, Fischler S, Carollo J, Reinthaler A, Huber D, Biedermann R. Are our expectations bigger than the results we achieve? A comparative study analyzing potential advantages of ankle arthroplasty over arthrodesis. Int Orthop. 2014;38:1647–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Daniels TR, Younger AS, Penner M, Wing K, Dryden PJ, Wong H, Glazebrook M. Intermediate-term results of total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis: a COFAS multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:135–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Haddad SL, Coetzee JC, Estok R, Fahrback K, Banel D, Nalysnyk L. Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis. A systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1899–905.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zaidi R, Cro S, Gurusamy K, Siva N, Macgregor A, Henricson A, Goldberg A. The outcome of total ankle replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Joint J. 2013;95:1500–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Chalayon O, Wang B, Blakenhorn B, Jackson JB 3rd, Beals T, Nickisch F, Saltzman CL. Factors affecting the outcomes of uncomplicated primary open ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36:1170–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Schuh R, Hofstaetter J, Krismer M, Bevoni R, Windhage R, Hans-Joerg T. Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis. Comparison of sports, recreational activities and functional outcomes. Int Orthop. 2012;36:1207–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Saltzman CL, Kadoko RG, Suh JS. Treatment of isolated ankle osteoarthritis with arthrodesis or the total ankle replacement: a comparison of early outcomes. Clin Orthop Surg. 2010;2:1–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Gross CE, Lampley A, Green CL, DeOrio JK, Easley M, Adams S, Nunley JAII. The effect of obesity on functional outcomes and complications in total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37:137–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Gross CE, Green CL, DeOrio JK, Easley M, Adams S, Nunley JA II. Impact of diabetes on outcome of total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36:1144–9.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Langley A, Gross CE, Green CL, DeOrio JK, Easley M, Adams S, Nunley JA II. Association of cigarette use and complication rates and outcomes following total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int 2016;37:10521059.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Espinosa N, Walti M, Favre P, Snedeker JG. Misalignment of total ankle components can induce high ankle joint pressures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1179–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Tochigi Y, Rudert MJ, Brown TD, McIff TE, Saltzman CL. The effect of accuracy of implantation on range of movement of the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2005;87:736–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Gross CE, Hamid KS, Green C, Easley ME, JK DO, Nunley JA. Operative wound complications following total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38:360–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dolfi HerscoviciJr.
    • 1
  • Julia M. Scaduto
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of OrthopedicsTampa General HospitalTemple TerraceUSA
  2. 2.Tampa General Hospital, Florida Orthopedic InstituteTemple TerraceUSA

Personalised recommendations