Advertisement

Industrial Development in Post-revolutionary Iran: Continuity and Reform in a Turbulent Environment

  • Mohamad R. Razavi
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter examines industrial development in Iran during the past four decades. It looks at both external and internal challenges. Economic and industrial trends exhibit erratic patterns of high growth followed by growth collapse. This is due to the injection of oil revenues into the economy resulting in inflationary pressures, overvaluation of domestic currency, soaring imports, price controls, and pro-cyclical fiscal policies. Such a process gradually leads to foreign exchange shortages, sudden devaluations, and growth collapse. The share of industry in Iran’s GDP has been gradually rising in real terms (constant prices). Whereas in a high-inflation economy imports check the price of manufactured tradables, the price of non-tradables increases substantially. As a result, the share of industry in GDP has decreased in current prices. In addition, there has been a major change in the mix of industries. Consumer goods as well as engineering- and labor-intensive industries have lost share by 50% in terms of most indicators. In contrast, resource-based, capital- and energy-intensive industries have doubled their shares. Thus there has been a clear shift in the production specialization of the country. This is reflected in the Iranian export specialization as well, since close to 90% of the country’s manufacturing exports are either directly derived from oil and gas or are highly energy-intensive—defying diversification goals. In addition, investment priorities for industrial development have been based on a “comparative advantage” logic, whereas major delays and policy challenges have emerged in moving along the value chains into downstream industries and/or diversifying into new, more knowledge- and technology-intensive industries.

Keywords

Industrial development Manufacturing Learning Industrial policy Capability development Iran 

Notes

Acknowledgment

Appreciation is extended to Afsaneh Shafie and Dariush Mobasser of Institute for Trade Studies and Research for highly beneficial discussions and comments.

Disclaimer

The chapter reflects its author’s personal views and is not to be taken as the official views of past or present institutions with which he has been associated.

References

  1. Amsden AH (1989) Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Auty R (1993) Sustaining development in mineral economies: the resource curse thesis. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Auty RM, Gelb AH (2001) Political economy of resource-abundant states. In: Auty RM (ed) Resource abundance and economic development. Oxford University Press, London, pp 126–146Google Scholar
  4. CBI [Central Bank of Iran] (1989–2016) Gozaresh-e eqtesadi va taraz-nameh (Economic report and balance sheet of Central Bank of Iran) (in Persian)Google Scholar
  5. Cimoli M, Dosi G, Stigliz JE (2009) The future of industrial policies in the new millennium: towards a knowledge-centered development agenda. In: Cimoli M, Dosi G, Stiglitz JE (eds) Industrial policy and development: the political economy of capabilities accumulation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 541–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Corden W, Neary J (1982) Booming sector and de-industrialization in a small open economy. Econ J 92(368):825–848.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2232670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ECLAC [Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean] (1990) Changing production patterns with social equity: the prime task of Latin American and Caribbean development in the 1990s. ECLAC, SantiagoGoogle Scholar
  8. Hausmann R, Rodrik D (2006) Doomed to choose: industrial policy as predicament. Draft paper prepared for the Blue Sky seminar, Center for International Development, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Hausmann R, Hwang J, Rodrik D (2007) What you export matters. J Econ Growth 12(1):1–25.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-006-9009-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hidalgo CA, Klinger B, Barabási AL, Hausmann R (2007) The product space conditions the development of nations. Science 317(5837):482–487.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Humphreys M, Sachs J, Stiglitz J (2007) Introduction: what is the problem with natural resource wealth? In: Humphreys M, Sachs J, Stiglitz J (eds) Escaping the resource curse. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 1–20Google Scholar
  12. Iranian Privatization Organization (2015) Barrasi-e amalkard-e khosusi-sazi dar ejra-ye syasatha-ye kolli-ye asl-e 44-e ghanun-e asasi (Study of privatization performance toward executing the general policies of decree no. 44 of Constitution Law) (in Persian)Google Scholar
  13. Krueger A (1974) The political economy of the rent-seeking society. Am Econ Rev 64(3):291–308. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1808883
  14. Lin JY (2009) Economic development and transition: thought, strategy and viability. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lin JY (2012) The quest for prosperity: how developing economies can take off. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  16. Majles [Islamic Consultative Assembly] (2017) Texts of five-year economic, social, and cultural development plans in the post-revolutionary period. http://rc.majlis.ir. Accessed 11 Feb 2016 (in Persian)
  17. MEAF [Ministry of Economic Affairs and Finance] (2004) Rob’-e qarn faraz va nashib: barrasi-ye tahavvolat-e eqtesadi-e keshvar teyy-e salha-ye 1358–1382 (Ups and downs over a quarter century: a study of the nation’s economic transformations during 1979 to 2003). Office of Deputy Minister for Economic Affairs, Tehran (in Persian)Google Scholar
  18. MIMT [Ministry of Industry, Mine and Trade] (2001–2017) Gozaresh-e amalkard-e salaneh (Annual performance report). Ministry of Industry, Mine and Trade, Tehran (in Persian)Google Scholar
  19. Nili M (2017) Eqtesad-e Iran: Chegunegi-ye gozar az abar-chaleshha (Iranian economy: how to pass through super challenges), vol 1–2. Institute for Management and Planning Studies, Tehran (in Persian)Google Scholar
  20. Ocampo JA (2014) Latin American structuralism and production development strategies. In: Salazar-Xirinachs JM, Nübler I, Kozul-Wright R (eds) Transforming economies: making industrial policy work for growth, jobs, and development. International Labor Organization, Geneva, pp 41–64Google Scholar
  21. Ocampo JA, Rada C, Taylor L (2009) Growth and policy in developing countries: a structuralist approach. Columbia University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Razavi MR, Salim A, Afshari-fard M (2018, forthcoming) Sarmayeh-gozari-ye mostaqim-e khareji dar Iran (Foreign direct investment in Iran) (in Persian)Google Scholar
  23. Rodrik D (2007) One economics, many recipes: globalization, institutions and economic growth. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  24. Salazar-Xirinachs JM, Nübler I, Kozul-Wright R (2014) Industrial policy, productive transfromation, and jobs: theory, history, and practice. In: Salazar-Xirinachs JM, Nübler I, Kozul-Wright R (eds) Transforming economies: making industrial policy work for growth, jobs, and development. International Labor Organization, Geneva, pp 1–38Google Scholar
  25. SCI [Statistical Center of Iran] (1994–2016) Sarshomari-e kargah-haye bozorg-e san’ati (Census of large industrial establishments) (in Persian)Google Scholar
  26. Shafie A, Mobasser D (2018) Barrasi-e seyr-e tahavvolat-e sanati-ye keshvar az avvalin barnameh-ye towse’eh-ye eqtesadi-e pas az enghelab (National industrial transformations since the First Development Plan after the Revolution). Institute for Trade Studies and Research, Tehran (in Persian)Google Scholar
  27. Tashkini A (2016) Tahlili bar sahm-e bakhsh-e san’at az towlid-e nakhales-e dakheli (An analysis of the share of manufacturing in GDP) Didgah 752. Institute for Trade Studies and Research, Tehran (in Persian)Google Scholar
  28. Wade R (1990) Governing the market: economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohamad R. Razavi
    • 1
  1. 1.Islamic Azad University—Science and Research BranchTehranIran

Personalised recommendations