The Rise and Fall of Cognition and the Realization of the Larger Mind of Unconscious Knowing (Savoir)
This chapter is a psychoanalytic response to cognitivism loosely inspired by Lacan’s Seminar XIX ‘ou pire…’. I distinguish between two types of cognition: Statements and narratives represent S1 − S2 relations between signifiers, while the unconscious saying represents an S1 − S0 relation. In S1 − S2 relations meaning comes from the relationship between words, while in the S1 − S0 relation, meaning or significance, in this case, comes from the infusion or evocation of a form of jouissance. Instead of the subject (S1) being represented by another signifier (S2), the subject is a single signifier in the place of jouissance as an unmarked state or original form of experience that could be traumatic or therapeutic. Both type of relations represents the root of cognition, the capacity to differentiate this from that, and the system of language from the Real that lies outside language.
- Beck, A. T. (1967). The Diagnosis and Management of Depression. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
- Freud, A. (1936 ). The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defence. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
- Lacan, J. (1956 ). Ecrits. The First Complete Edition in English (B. Fink, Trans.). Seminar on the Purloined Letter (pp. 6–48). First published in French in 1966. New York: Norton and Norton.Google Scholar
- Lacan, J. (1971a). El Seminario de Jacques Lacan. Libro 19…o peor. Buenos Aires: Paidos.Google Scholar
- Lacan, J. (1971b). …ou pire. Seminar XIX (C. Gallagher, Trans.). Unpublished. www.lacaninireland.com. Accessed 29 Aug 2017.
- Lacan, J. (1971c). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan XVIII: On a Discourse That Might Not Be a Semblance (C. Gallagher, Trans.). London: Karnac.Google Scholar