Conclusions and Suggestions for Further Research

  • Marie De Somer
Part of the European Administrative Governance book series (EAGOV)


This chapter concludes by reviewing the study’s key findings and reflecting on their generalisability. The chapter also highlights three sets of limitations and suggests avenues for further research.


European integration Court’s role Least-likely case CJEU autonomy Court’s internal workings 


  1. Alter, K. (2000). The European Union’s Legal System and Domestic Policy: Spillover or Backlash? International Organization, 45(3), 489–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blauberger, M. (2014). National Responses to European Court Jurisprudence. West European Politics, 37(3), 457–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carrera, S., De Somer, M., & Petkova, B. (2012). The European Court of Justice as Fundamental Rights Tribunal: Challenges for the Effective Delivery of Fundamental Rights in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. CEPS Papers in Liberty and Security, No. 49/August 2012. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  4. Carrera, S., & Petkova, B. (2013). The Potential of Civil Society and Human Rights Organizations through Third-party Interventions before the European Courts: The EU’s Area of Freedom Security and Justice. In Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice Causes, Responses and Solutions (pp. 211–232). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Dawson, M. (2014). How Does the European Court of Justice Reason? A Review Essay on the Legal Reasoning of the European Court of Justice. European Law Journal, 20(3), 423–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dederke, J., & Naurin, D. (2017). Friends of the Court? Why EU Governments File Observations before the Court of Justice. European Journal of Political Research, 2017, 1–16.Google Scholar
  7. De Witte, M., Mayoral, J., Jaremba, U., Wind, M., & Podstawa, K. (2016). National Courts and EU Law. New Issues, Theories and Methods. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dyevre, A. (2016). Domestic Judicial Defiance and the Authority of International Legal Regimes. European Journal of Law and Economics, 35(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
  9. Granger, M.-P. (2004). When Governments Go to Luxembourg …: The Influence of Governments on the Court of Justice. European Law Review, 29(1), 3–31.Google Scholar
  10. Malecki, M. (2012). Do ECJ Judges all Speak with the Same Voice? Evidence of Divergent Preferences from the Judgments of Chambers. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(1), 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Martinsen, D. S. (2015). An Ever More Powerful Court? The Political Constraints of Legal Integration in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mayoral, J. (2016). In the CJEU Judges Trust: A New Approach in the Judicial Construction of Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(3), 551–568.Google Scholar
  13. Schmidt, S. (2014). Judicial Europeanisation: The Case of Zambrano in Ireland. West European Politics, 37(4), 769–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Staton, J., & Moore, W. (2011). Judicial Power in Domestic and International Politics. International Organization, 65(3), 553–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Vauchez, A. (2012). Keeping the Dream Alive: The European Court of Justice and the Transnational Fabric of Integrationist Jurisprudence. European Political Science Review, 4(1), 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Vink, M., Claes, M., & Arnold, C. (2009). Explaining the Use of Preliminary References by Domestic Courts in EU Member States: A Mixed-Method Comparative Analysis. Paper presented at the 11th Biennial Conference of the European Union Studies Association, 24 April 2009, Marina del Rey.Google Scholar
  17. Zhang, A., Liu, J., & Garoupa, N. (2016). Judging in Europe: Do Legal Traditions Matter? King’s College London Law School Research Paper, No. 2016-03. London: King’s College.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marie De Somer
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations