Advertisement

Introduction

  • Marie De Somer
Chapter
Part of the European Administrative Governance book series (EAGOV)

Abstract

The book’s introduction presents the research agenda and questions guiding the study. It briefly considers how questions on the role of the Court of Justice in European integration processes have occupied academic debates, and highlights earlier observations made in literature on the politico-strategic value of precedents in that context. The study’s testing strategies are presented and the structure of the book is outlined.

Keywords

European integration Mixed methods Court’s role 

References

Primary Sources

    CJEU Case Law

    1. Case C-34/09 Gerardo Ruiz Zambrano v Office national de l’emploi (ONEM) [2011] ECR I-1177.Google Scholar
    2. Case C-434/09 Shirley McCarthy v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] ECR I-3375.Google Scholar
    3. Case C-256/11 Murat Dereci and Others v Bundesministerium für Inneres [2011] ECR I-11315.Google Scholar

Other Sources

  1. Eurostat. (2017). Residence Permit Statistics. Retrieved December 28, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Residence_permits_statistics

Literature

  1. Adams, M., De Waele, H., Meeusen, J., & Straetmans, G. (2013). Judging Europe’s Judges: The Legitimacy of the Case Law of the European Court of Justice. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Alter, K. (1998). Who are the Masters of the Treaty? European Governments and the European Court of Justice. International Organization, 25(1), 125–152.Google Scholar
  3. Alter, K. (2008). Agents or Trustees? International Courts in Their Political Context. European Journal of International Relations, 14(1), 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blauberger, M. (2012). With Luxembourg in Mind…The Remaking of National Policies in the Face of ECJ Jurisprudence. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(1), 109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carruba, C., Gabel, M., & Hankla, C. (2008). Judicial Behavior under Political Constraints: Evidence from the European Court of Justice. American Political Science Review, 102(4), 435–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carruba, J., Gabel, M., & Hankla, C. (2012). Understanding the Role of the European Court of Justice in European Integration. American Political Science Review, 106(1), 214–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Conant, L. (2002). Justice Contained: Law and Politics in the European Union. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Creswell, J., & Clark, V. (2010). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Dawson, M. (2014). How Does the European Court of Justice Reason? A Review Essay on the Legal Reasoning of the European Court of Justice. European Law Journal, 20(3), 423–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Witte, M., Dawson, M., & Muir, E. (2013). Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice Causes, Responses and Solutions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Garrett, G. (1992). International Cooperation and Institutional Choice: The European Community’s Internal Market. International Organization, 46(2), 533–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garrett, G. (1995). The Politics of Legal Integration in the European Union. International Organization, 49(1), 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garrett, G., Kelemen, R. D., & Schulz, H. (1998). The European Court of Justice, National Governments, and Legal Integration in the European Union. International Organization, 52(1), 149–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garrett, G., & Weingast, B. (1993). Ideas, Interests and Institutions: Constructing the European Community’s Internal Market. In J. Goldstein & R. Keohane (Eds.), Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change (pp. 173–206). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  15. George, A., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Goldner-Lang, I. (2018, January 24). Towards ‘Judicial Passivism’ in EU Migration and Asylum Law? Preliminary Thoughts for the Final Plenary Session of the 2018 Odysseus Conference. Blogpost on EU Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy. Retrieved from http://eumigrationlawblog.eu/towards-judicial-passivism-in-eu-migration-and-asylum-law-preliminary-thoughts-for-the-final-plenary-session-of-the-2018-odysseus-conference/
  17. Hailbronner, K., & Thym, D. (2011). Comment on Zambrano. Common Market Law Review, 48, 1253–1270.Google Scholar
  18. Lenaerts, K. (2015). EU Citizenship and the European Court of Justice’s ‘Stone-by-Stone’ Approach. International Comparative Jurisprudence, 1, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mattli, W., & Slaughter, A.-M. (1995). Law and Politics in the European Union: A Reply to Garrett. International Organization, 49(1), 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mattli, W., & Slaughter, A. M. (1998). Revisiting the European Court of Justice. International Organization, 52(1), 177–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schmidt, S. (2014). Judicial Europeanisation: The Case of Zambrano in Ireland. West European Politics, 37(4), 769–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stein, E. (1981). Lawyers, Judges, and the Making of a Transnational Constitution. The American Journal of International Law, 75(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stone Sweet, A. (2010). The European Court of Justice and the Judicialization of EU Governance. Living Reviews in European Governance, 5(2), 1–50.Google Scholar
  24. Stone Sweet, A., & Brunell, T. (2012). The European Court of Justice, State Noncompliance, and the Politics of Override. American Political Science Review, 106(1), 204–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marie De Somer
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations