Advertisement

Consequences of Unequal Citizenship

  • Jennifer Shore
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology book series (PSEPS)

Abstract

What are the implications of unequal democratic political input for the representativeness and health of democratic states? This is the question guiding this chapter, which provides a review and discussion of the main findings of the empirical analyses of how social policies can shape both the levels and distributions of political participation and democratic support. The study’s limitations and the challenges for future research are discussed with a view to implications that the findings have for the legitimacy of modern democratic societies.

References

  1. American Political Science Association Task Force. 2004. American Democracy in an Age of Rising Inequality. Perspectives on Politics 2 (04): 651–666. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759270404040X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ariely, Gal. 2013. Public Administration and Citizen Satisfaction with Democracy: Cross-national Evidence. International Review of Administrative Sciences 79 (4): 747–766. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852313501432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartels, Larry M. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. New York and Princeton, NJ: Russell Sage Foundation and Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brooks, C., and J. Manza. 2006. Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies. American Sociological Review 71 (3): 474–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruch, Sarah K., Myra M. Ferree, and Joe Soss. 2010. From Policy to Polity: Democracy, Paternalism, and the Incorporation of Disadvantaged Citizens. American Sociological Review 75 (2): 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122410363563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, Andrea Louise. 2012. Policy Makes Mass Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 15 (1): 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-012610-135202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Christensen, Tom, and Per Laegreid. 2005. Trust in Government: The Relative Importance of Service Satisfaction, Political Factors, and Demography. Public Performance & Management Review 28 (4): 487–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2005.11051848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cox, Robert. 2004. The Path-Dependency of an Idea: Why Scandinavian Welfare States Remain Distinct. Social Policy & Administration 38 (2): 204–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2004.00386.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dalton, Russell J. 2004. Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0620/2004300752-t.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elsässer, Lea, Svenja Hense, and Armin Schäfer. 2017. “Dem Deutschen Volke”? Die ungleiche Responsivität des Bundestags. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 27 (2): 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41358-017-0097-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Giger, Nathalie, Jan Rosset, and Julian Bernauer. 2012. The Poor Political Representation of the Poor in a Comparative Perspective. Representation 48 (1): 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2012.653238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gilens, Martin. 2005. Inequality and Democratic Responsiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly 69 (5): 778–796. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfi058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ———. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton, NJ and New York: Princeton University Press and Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  15. Gilens, Martin, and Benjamin I. Page. 2014. Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens. Perspective on Politics 12 (3): 564–581. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592714001595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grönlund, Kimmo, and Maija Setälä. 2007. Political Trust, Satisfaction and Voter Turnout. Comparative European Politics 5 (4): 400–422. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huber, Evelyne, and John D. Stephens. 2002. Globalisation, Competitiveness, and the Social Democratic Model. Social Policy and Society 1 (1): 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746402001070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. 1999. Mapping Political Support in the 1990s: A Global Analysis. In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance, ed. Pippa Norris, 31–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Korpi, Walter. 1989. Power, Politics, and State Autonomy in the Development of Social Citizenship: Social Rights During Sickness in Eighteen OECD Countries Since 1930. Reprint Series/Swedish Institute for Social Research 245. Stockholm: Stockholms University and Swedish Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  20. Kumlin, Staffan. 2004. The Personal and the Political: How Personal Welfare State Experiences Affect Political Trust and Ideology. Political Evolution and Institutional Change. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Kumlin, Staffan, and Bo Rothstein. 2005. Making and Breaking Social Capital: The Impact of Welfare-State Institutions. Comparative Political Studies 38 (4): 339–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marien, Sofie, and Marc Hooghe. 2011. Does Political Trust Matter? An Empirical Investigation into the Relation Between Political Trust and Support for Law Compliance. European Journal of Political Research 50 (2): 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01930.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mettler, Suzanne, and Jeffrey M. Stonecash. 2008. Government Program Usage and Political Voice. Social Science Quarterly 89 (2): 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00532.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moynihan, Donald P., and Joe Soss. 2014. Policy Feedback and the Politics of Administration. Public Administration Review 74 (3): 320–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Norris, Pippa, ed. 1999. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Peters, Yvette, and Sander J. Ensink. 2015. Differential Responsiveness in Europe: The Effects of Preference Difference and Electoral Participation. West European Politics 38 (3): 577–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.973260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pierson, Paul. 1993. When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change. World Politics 45 (4): 595–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Plutzer, Eric. 2010. Do Highly Exclusive Social Welfare Programs Increase Political Inequality? A Comparative Analysis of the 50 US States. Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB) Working Paper No. SP (2010-01).Google Scholar
  29. Rosset, Jan. 2013. Are the Policy Preferences of Relatively Poor Citizens Under-represented in the Swiss Parliament? The Journal of Legislative Studies 19 (4): 490–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2013.812363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rothstein, Bo. 1998. Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rothstein, Bo, and Sven Steinmo, eds. 2002. Restructuring the Welfare State: Political Institutions and Policy Change. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Schäfer, Armin. 2015. Der Verlust politischer Gleichheit: Warum die sinkende Wahlbeteiligung der Demokratie schadet. Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut [MPI] für Gesellschaftsforschung, Köln Band 81. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  33. Tyler, Tom R. 2006. Why People Obey the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Scholzman, and Henry E. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Watson, Sara. 2015. Does Welfare Conditionality Reduce Democratic Participation? Comparative Political Studies 48 (5): 645–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414014556043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wichowsky, Amber, and Donald P. Moynihan. 2008. Measuring How Administration Shapes Citizenship: A Policy Feedback Perspective on Performance Management. Public Administration Review 68 (5): 908–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer Shore
    • 1
  1. 1.Mannheim Centre for European Social ResearchUniversity of MannheimMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations