Advertisement

The Impact of Social Policy on Democratic Citizenship

  • Jennifer Shore
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology book series (PSEPS)

Abstract

Using multilevel regression models with cross-level interactions between income and social expenditures, the hypotheses on how the welfare state can shape democratic citizenship is empirically tested. Voting, political interest, political trust, and satisfaction with democracy are all found to be higher in countries where a policy priority on working-age adults and families exists. More nuanced patterns are, however, found with regard to the social gradient in democratic citizenship: while larger welfare states appear to promote greater political equality across some aspects of democratic citizenship, the gap between the richest and poorest citizens remains even in generous welfare states with regard to political trust.

References

  1. Aarts, Kees, and Jacques Thomassen. 2008. Satisfaction with Democracy: Do Institutions Matter? Electoral Studies 27 (1): 5–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2007.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abelson, Robert P., Elizabeth F. Loftus, and Anthony Greenwald. 1992. Attempts to Improve the Accuracy of Self-reports of Voting. In Questions About Questions: Inquiries into the Cognitive Bases of Surveys, ed. Judith M. Tanur, 138–153. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  3. American Political Science Association Task Force. 2004. American Democracy in an Age of Rising Inequality. Perspectives on Politics 2 (4): 651–666.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759270404040X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, Christopher J., and Christine A. Guillory. 1997. Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems. The American Political Science Review 91 (1): 66–81.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2952259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, Christopher J., and Matthew M. Singer. 2008. The Sensitive Left and the Impervious Right: Multilevel Models and the Politics of Inequality, Ideology, and Legitimacy in Europe. Comparative Political Studies 41 (4/5): 564–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Armingeon, Klaus, David Weisstanner, Sarah Engler, Potolidis Panajotis, Gerber Marlène, and Philipp Leimgruber. 2011. Comparative Political Data Set 1960–2009. Berne: Institute of Political Science, University of Berne.Google Scholar
  7. Belli, Robert F., Michael W. Traugott, Margaret Young, and Katherine A. McGonagle. 1999. Reducing Vote Overreporting in Surveys: Social Desirability, Memory Failure, and Source Monitoring. The Public Opinion Quarterly 63 (1): 90–108. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2991270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennett, Linda, and Stephen E. Bennett. 1989. Enduring Gender Differences in Political Interest: The Impact of Socialization and Political Dispositions. American Politics Quarterly 17 (1): 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bernauer, Julian, and Adrian Vatter. 2012. Can’t Get No Satisfaction with the Westminster Model? Winners, Losers and the Effects of Consensual and Direct Democratic Institutions on Satisfaction with Democracy. European Journal of Political Research 51 (4): 435–468.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02007.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blais, Andre. 2006. What Affects Voter Turnout? Annual Review of Political Science 9: 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blais, Andre, and R. Kenneth Carty. 1990. Does Proportional Representation Foster Voter Turnout? European Journal of Political Research 18 (2): 167–181.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1990.tb00227.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blais, Andre, and Agnieszka Dobrzynska. 1998. Turnout in Electoral Democracies. European Journal of Political Research 33 (2): 239–261.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brady, David. 2003. The Politics of Poverty: Left Political Institutions, the Welfare State, and Poverty. Social Forces 82 (2): 557–588.  https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2004.0004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brady, Henry E., Sidney Verba, and Kay Lehman Scholzman. 1995. Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation. American Political Science Review 89 (2): 271–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brambor, Thomas, William Roberts Clark, and Matt Golder. 2006. Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses. Political Analysis 14 (1): 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Buis, Maarten L. 2010. Stata Tip 87: Interpretations of Interactions in Non-linear Models. The Stata Journal 10 (2): 305–308.Google Scholar
  17. Burns, Nancy. 2002. Gender: Public Opinion and Political Action. In Political Science: State of the Discipline, ed. Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner, 462–487. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  18. Campbell, David E. 2006. Why We Vote: How Schools and Communities Shape Our Civic Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dalton, Russell J. 2000. Citizen Attitudes and Political Behavior. Comparative Political Studies 33 (6–7): 912–940.  https://doi.org/10.1177/001041400003300609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Easton, David. 1975. A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support. British Journal of Political Science 5 (4): 435–457.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400008309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ESS Round 3: European Social Survey Round 3 Data. 2006. Data file edition 3.6. NSD—Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway—Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.Google Scholar
  22. ESS Round 4: European Social Survey Round 4 Data. 2008. Data file edition 4.4. NSD—Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway—Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.Google Scholar
  23. European Social Survey. 2010. ESS Round 4 (2008/2009): Final Activity Report. London: Centre for Comparative Social Surveys: City University London.Google Scholar
  24. Foley, Michael W., and Bob Edwards. 1996. The Paradox of Civil Society. Journal of Democracy 7 (3): 38–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Franklin, Mark N. 1997. Electoral Participation. In Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective, ed. Lawrence LeDuc, Richard G. Niemi, and Pippa Norris, 216–235. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  26. ———. 1999. Electoral Engineering and Cross-National Turnout Differences: What Role for Compulsory Voting? British Journal of Political Science 29 (1): 205–216. http://www.jstor.org/stable/194302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goodin, Robert E., and John Dryzek. 1980. Rational Participation: The Politics of Relative Power. British Journal of Political Science 10 (3): 273–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gray, Mark, and Miki Caul. 2016. Declining Voter Turnout in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 1950 to 1997. Comparative Political Studies 33 (9): 1091–1122.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414000033009001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hicks, Alexander M., and Duane H. Swank. 1992. Politics, Institutions, and Welfare Spending in Industrialized Democracies, 1960–82. The American Political Science Review 86 (3): 658–674. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1964129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Highton, Benjamin. 2005. Self-Reported Versus Proxy-Reported Voter Turnout in the Current Population Survey. Public Opinion Quarterly 69 (1): 113–123.  https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfi003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hooghe, Marc. 2004. Political Socialization and the Future of Politics. Acta Politica 39 (4): 331–341.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hooghe, Marc, and Koen Pelleriaux. 1998. Compulsory Voting in Belgium: An Application of the Lijphart Thesis. Electoral Studies 17 (4): 419–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hox, Joop. 2002. Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. New York: Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
  34. Inglehart, R., C. Haerpfer, A. Moreno, C. Welzel, K. Kizilova, J. Diez-Medrano, M. Lagos, et al., eds. 2014. World Values Survey: Round Five—Country-Pooled Datafile Version: www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV5.jsp. Madrid: JD Systems Institute.
  35. Jackman, Robert W. 1987. Political Institutions and Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies. The American Political Science Review 81 (2): 405–424.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1961959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jackman, Robert W., and Ross A. Miller. 1995. Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies During the 1980s. Comparative Political Studies 27 (4): 467–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Karp, Jeffrey A., and Susan A. Banducci. 2008. Political Efficacy and Participation in Twenty-Seven Democracies: How Electoral Systems Shape Political Behaviour. British Journal of Political Science 38 (02): 311–334.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. 1999. Mapping Political Support in the 1990s: A Global Analysis. In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance, ed. Pippa Norris, 31–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kuitto, Kati. 2011. More Than Just Money: Patterns of Disaggregated Welfare Expenditure in the Enlarged Europe. Journal of Social Policy 21 (4): 348–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lijphart, Arend. 1997. Unequal Participation: Democracy’s Unresolved Dilemma—Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1996. American Political Science Review 91 (1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. ———. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. http://www.gbv.de/dms/sub-hamburg/254385370.pdf.Google Scholar
  42. Linde, Jonas, and Joakim Ekman. 2003. Satisfaction with Democracy: A Note on a Frequently Used Indicator in Comparative Politics. European Journal of Political Research 42 (3): 391–408.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Luskin, Robert C. 1990. Explaining Political Sophistication. Political Behavior 12 (4): 331–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Macedo, Stephen. 2005. Democracy at Risk: How Political Choices Undermine Citizen Participation and What We Can Do About It. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  45. Magalhaes, Pedro C. 2006. Confidence in Parliaments: Performance, Representation and Accountability. In Political Disaffection in Contemporary Democracies: Social Capital, Institutions and Politics, ed. Mariano Torcal and José R. Montero, 190–214. Routledge Research in Comparative Politics 13. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Mau, Steffen. 2003. The Moral Economy of Welfare States: Britain and Germany Compared. Routledge/EUI Studies in the Political Economy of Welfare 5. London and New York: Routledge. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/alltitles/docDetail.action?docID=10097518.
  47. McAllister, Ian. 1999. The Economic Performance of Governments. In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance, ed. Pippa Norris, 188–203. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mettler, Suzanne, and Joe Soss. 2004. The Consequences of Public Policy for Democratic Citizenship: Bridging Policy Studies and Mass Politics. Perspectives on Politics 2 (1): 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Miller, Arthur, and Ola Listhaug. 1999. Political Performance and Institutional Trust. In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance, ed. Pippa Norris, 204–216. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Miller, Joanne M., and Wendy Rahn. 2002. Identity-Based Feelings, Beliefs, and Actions: How Being Influences Doing. Presented at the annual meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  51. Newton, Kenneth, and Pippa Norris. 2000. Confidence in Public Institutions: Faith, Culture, or Performance? In Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries? ed. Susan J. Pharr and Robert D. Putnam, 52–73. Princeton, NJ and Chichester: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Oskarson, Maria. 2010. Social and Political Marginalization in Hard Times. APSA 2010 Annual Meeting Paper.Google Scholar
  53. Pacek, Alexander C., Grigore Pop-Eleches, and Joshua A. Tucker. 2009. Disenchanted or Discerning: Voter Turnout in Post-Communist Countries. The Journal of Politics 71 (2): 473–491.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609090409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Panagopoulos, Costas. 2008. The Calculus of Voting in Compulsory Voting Systems. Political Behavior 30 (4): 455–467.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-008-9058-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Powell, G. Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Rabe-Hesketh, Sophia, and Anders Skrondal. 2008. Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  57. Rose, Richard. 1994. Postcommunism and the Problem of Trust. Journal of Democracy 5 (3): 18–30.  https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1994.0042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ross, Fiona. 2000. ‘Beyond Left and Right’: The New Partisan Politics of Welfare. Governance 13 (2): 155–183.  https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rothstein, Bo. 1998. Political Institutions: An Overview. In A New Handbook of Political Science, ed. Robert E. Goodin and Hans-Dieter Klingemann, 133–167. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schäfer, Armin. 2013. Liberalization, Inequality, and Democracy’s Discontent. In Politics in the Age of Austerity, ed. Armin Schäfer and Wolfgang Streeck, 169–195. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  61. Schattschneider, Elmer E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People: A Study of Free Private Enterprise in Pressure Politics, as Shown in the 1929–1930 Revision of the Tariff. New York: Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  62. Singh, Shane. 2011. How Compelling is Compulsory Voting? A Multilevel Analysis of Turnout. Political Behavior 33 (1): 95–111.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9107-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. ———. 2014. Not All Election Winners are Equal: Satisfaction with Democracy and the Nature of the Vote. European Journal of Political Research 53 (2): 308–327.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Solt, Frederick. 2008. Economic Inequality and Democratic Political Engagement. American Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 48–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stadelmann-Steffen, Isabelle. 2011. Dimensions of Family Policy and Female Labor Market Participation: Analyzing Group-Specific Policy Effects. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 24 (2): 331–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stockemer, D., Bernadette LaMontagne, and Lyle Scruggs. 2013. Bribes and Ballots: The Impact of Corruption on Voter Turnout in Democracies. International Political Science Review 34 (1): 74–90.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512111419824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Svallfors, Stefan. 2007. Introduction. In The Political Sociology of the Welfare State: Institutions, Social Cleavages, and Orientations, ed. Stefan Svallfors, 1–29. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tavits, Margit, and Taavi Annus. 2006. Learning to Make Votes Count: The Role of Democratic Experience. Electoral Studies 25 (1): 72–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2005.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. 2015. CSES Module 3 Full Release. [dataset]. December 15, 2015 version.  https://doi.org/10.7804/cses.module3.2015-12-15.
  70. van der Meer, Tom. 2010. In What We Trust? A Multi-level Study into Trust in Parliament as an Evaluation of State Characteristics. International Review of Administrative Sciences 76 (3): 517–536.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852310372450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. van Deth, Jan W. 1990. Interest in Politics. In Continuities in Political Action: A Longitudinal Study of Political Orientations in Three Western Democracies, ed. M.K. Jennings, 275–312. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  72. ———. 2000. Interesting But Irrelevant: Social Capital and the Saliency of Politics in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research 37 (2): 115–147.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Verba, Sidney, and Norman H. Nie. 1972. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  74. Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Scholzman, and Henry E. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Walzer, Michael. 1992. The Civil Society Argument. In Dimensions of Radical Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship, Community, ed. Chantal Mouffe, 89–107. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer Shore
    • 1
  1. 1.Mannheim Centre for European Social ResearchUniversity of MannheimMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations