Advertisement

Distribution and Integration

  • Jonas Köster
Chapter

Abstract

To release the finished instructional video content, a number of options for distribution need to be considered to ensure effective integration into existing content. Educational video content can be distributed and monetized through a number of channels, such as fee-based online courses, MOOCs, or as part of blended learning modalities. This chapter delves into the different distribution channels.

Keywords

Video in higher education Video in blended and hybrid learning Free online courses Videos in MOOCs Videos in fee-based courses 

References

  1. Allen, E., & Seamen, J. (2013). Changing course ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group.Google Scholar
  2. Battaglino, T. B., Haldeman, M., & Laurans, E. (2012). The costs of online learning. In Creating sound policy for digital learning: A working paper series from the Thomas B. Fordham Institute. Boston: The Parthenon Group.Google Scholar
  3. Cormier, D., & Siemens, G. (2010). Through the open door: Open courses as research, learning, and engagement. Educause Review, 45(4), 30–39. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/through-open-door-open-courses-research-learning-and-engagement
  4. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. The Internet in Higher Education, 18, 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hill, P. (2012a). Online educational delivery models: A descriptive view. Educause Review, 46(12), 1–3. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/online-educational-delivery-models-descriptive-view
  7. Hill, P. (2012b). Four barriers that MOOCs must overcome to build a sustainable model. eLiterate. Retrieved from http://mfeldstein.com/four-barriers-that-moocs-must-overcome-to-become-sustainable-model/
  8. Hollands, F. M., & Tirthali, D. (2014). MOOCs: Expectations and reality. New York: Center for Benefit-Cost Studies of Education Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  9. Kapp, K., Blair, L., & Mesch, R. (2013). The gamification of learning and instruction field book: Ideas into practice. Boston: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Martin, M. H. (2003). Factors influencing faculty adoption of Web-based courses in teacher education programs within the State University of New York (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-04282003-161823
  11. Parkin, M. (2012). Economics (10th ed.). Boston: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  12. Picciano, A. (2009). Blending with purpose: The multimodal model. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology, 5(1), 4–14.Google Scholar
  13. Piper, T. H. (2010). What policy changes do experts recommend K-12 instructional leaders enact to support the implementation of online instruction and learning? La Verne, CA: University of La Verne.Google Scholar
  14. Powell, A. (2011). A case study of e-learning initiatives in New Zealand’s secondary schools. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest.Google Scholar
  15. Selingo, J. J. (2014a). Demystifying the MOOC. In The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/02/education/edlife/demystifying-the-mooc.html
  16. Selingo, J. J. (2014b). Can prometheus be unbound? The future of higher education. Tucson, AZ: WASC Academic Resource Conference (ARC).Google Scholar
  17. Shea, P. (2007). Bridges and barriers to teaching online college courses: A study of experienced online faculty in thirty-six colleges. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 73–128.Google Scholar
  18. Siemens, G. (2011). How data and analytics can improve education. San Francisco: O’Reilley Media. Retrieved from http://radar.oreilly.com/2011/07/education-data-analytics-learning.html

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonas Köster
    • 1
  1. 1.Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institut für MedienwissenschaftBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations