Interactivity in Instructional Videos

  • Jonas Köster


The user experience of digital learning materials, including video, can be improved upon by enhancing the content with more engaging formats and greater interactivity. All instructional design decisions must be made based on how to best meet learning goals. This is true when adding interactivity, which has great potential for personalizing the learning experience, making it social, and involving the learner in a more active way, as well as providing an opportunity to integrate assessments, such as knowledge checks.


Video and interactivity personalized learning Control functionalities Video search Assessments Content branching Active learning 


  1. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC higher education reports. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, The George Washington University.Google Scholar
  3. Cannistra, M. (2016). 5 types of interactive marketing. Retrieved from
  4. Cennamo, K. S., Ross, J. D., & Rogers, C. S. (2002). Evolution of a web-enhanced course: Incorporating strategies for self-regulation. Educause Quarterly, 25(1), 28e33. Retrieved from
  5. Fällman, D., Backman, A., & Holmlund, K. (1999). VR in education: An introduction to multisensory constructivist learning environments. Universitetspedagogisk Konferens, Umeå Universitet, 18–19 Februari.Google Scholar
  6. Floyd, S. (1982). Thinking interactively. In S. Floyd & B. Floyd (Eds.), Handbook of interactive video. White Plains, NY: Knowledge Industry Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Fryer, W. (2017). Choose your own adventure YouTube video: Lessons learned. Retrieved from
  8. Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@Scale conference (pp. 41–50). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  9. Hacker, D. J., Bol, L., & Keener, M. C. (2008). Metacognition in education: A focus on calibration. In J. Dunlosky & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Handbook of metamemory and memory (pp. 429–455). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hannafin, M. J., Garhart, C., Rieber, L. P., & Phillips, T. L. (1985). Keeping interactive video in perspective: Tentative guidelines and cautions in the design of interactive video. Educational media and technology yearbook. Denver, CO: Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
  11. Hansch, A., Hillers, L., McConachie, K., Newman, C., Schildhauer, T., & Schmidt, P. (2015). Video and online learning: Critical reflections and findings from the field. SSRN Electronic Journal.
  12. Hartsell, T., & Yuen, S. C. Y. (2006). Video streaming in online learning. AACE Journal, 14(1), 31–43.Google Scholar
  13. Kauffman, D. F. (2004). Self-regulated learning in web-based environments: Instructional tools designed to facilitate cognitive strategy use, metacognitive processing, and motivational beliefs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(1-2), 139–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kumar, D. D. (2010). Approaches to interactive video anchors in problem-based science learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(1), 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lange, P. G. (2007). Publicly private and privately public: Social networking on YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 361–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Merkt, M., & Schwan, S. (2014). How does interactivity in videos affect task performance? Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 172–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Merkt, M., Weigand, S., Heier, A., & Schwan, S. (2011). Learning with videos vs. learning with print: The role of interactive features. Learning and Instruction, 21(6), 687–704.Google Scholar
  18. Pandey, A. (2017). 5 killer examples of interactive videos for corporate training. Retrieved from
  19. Petty, L. C., & Rosen, E. F. (1987). Computer-based interactive video systems. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 19(2), 160–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. Waltham, MA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 219–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ponce, H. R., & Mayer, R. E. (2014a). An eye movement analysis of highlighting and graphic organizer study aids for learning from expository text. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ponce, H. R., & Mayer, R. E. (2014b). Qualitatively different cognitive processing during online reading primed by different study activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schacter, D. L., & Szpunar, K. K. (2015). Enhancing attention and memory during video-recorded lectures. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(1), 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schaffer, L. C., & Hannafin, M. J. (1986). The effects of progressive interactivity on learning from interactive video. ECTJ, 34(2), 89–96.Google Scholar
  26. Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R. O., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2006). Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Information Management, 43(1), 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonas Köster
    • 1
  1. 1.Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institut für MedienwissenschaftBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations