Advertisement

The Ideological Basis of Children’s Participation in the Child Protection System

  • Mandy Duncan
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter identifies and critically analyses the dominant discourses that form the ideological conditions of children’s participation in child protection interventions. The central argument made in this chapter is that the dominant capitalist discourses of individualism and welfare-based paternalism work together to impede rather than enable children’s autonomy. It further argues that there is a fundamental conflict between children’s rights to participation and protection within statutory child protection interventions which provides justification for the widespread denial of children’s participatory rights despite a political ideology that supports the freedom of the individual in the interests of human flourishing.

References

  1. Alderson, P., Hawthorne, J., & Killen, M. (2005). The Participation Rights of Premature Babies. Journal of Social Sciences. An Emergent Discourse on the Right of the Child? Special Issue 9, 71–81.Google Scholar
  2. Archard, D. (1993). Children: Rights and Childhood. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Aries, P. (1962). Centuries of Childhood: A Social History of Family Life. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  4. Cameron, D. (2011). PM’s Speech on the Fightback After the Riots. Transcript. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pms-speech-on-the-fightback-after-the-riots. Accessed August 15, 2016.
  5. Gadda, A. (2008). Rights, Foucault and Power: A Critical Analysis of the United Nation Convention on the Rights of the Child (Edinburgh Working Papers in Sociology). Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  6. Glasman, M. (2013). Politics, Employment Policies and the Young Generation. Available at: http://www.lse.ac.uk/economics/newsEventsSeminars/files/MauriceGlasmanPaper.pdf. Accessed August 21, 2016.
  7. Hendrick, H. (2003). Child Welfare. Historical Dimensions, Contemporary Debate. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hobbes, T. (1651/1962). Leviathan. New York: Collier.Google Scholar
  9. James, A., & Prout, A. (1997). Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood. Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Jenks, C. (1996). Childhood. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Legislation.gov.uk. (1989). Children Act 1989. Available at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/41/section/47. Accessed March 19, 2018.
  12. Legislation.gov.uk. (2004). Children Act 2004. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/31/contents. Accessed March 19, 2018.
  13. Locke, J. (1689/1823). Two Treatises of Government. Glasgow: R. Griffin and Co.Google Scholar
  14. Longley, C. (2012). Understanding the Modern State—The Common Good. Paper Presented to the Von Hügel Institute Conference held at St Edmund’s College, Cambridge, June 25–26, 2012.Google Scholar
  15. MacNaughton, G., Hughes, P., & Smith, K. (2007). Young Children’s Rights and Public Policy: Practices and Possibilities for Citizenship in the Early Years. Children & Society, 21, 458–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mill, J. (1859/1974). On Liberty. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  17. Purdy, L. (1992). In Their Best Interest? The Case Against Equal Rights for Children. Ithaca, NY: Cornell.Google Scholar
  18. Rand, A. (1966). Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
  19. Rand, A. (1992). Atlas Shrugged. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  20. Rothbard, M. (1998). The Ethics of Liberty. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Smith, G. (2013). Defending the Non-Aggression Principle. A Reply to Matt Zwolinski. Part 4. Available at: https://www.libertarianism.org/publications/essays/excursions/defending-non-aggression-principle-reply-matt-zwolinski-part-1. Accessed March 19, 2018.
  22. Spencer, H. (1851/2000). Social Statics; Or, the Conditions Essential to Human Happiness Specified, and the First of Them Developed. Emeryville, CA: Adegi Graphics.Google Scholar
  23. The Children’s Society. (2009). A Good Childhood: Searching for Values in a Competitive Age. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  24. Thomas, N. (2000). Children Family and the State. Decision Making and Child Participation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tucker, B. (1882). Right and Individual Rights. Liberty I, 3.Google Scholar
  26. United Nations. (1959). Declaration of the Rights of the Child. Available at: http://www.unicef.org/malaysia/1959-Declaration-of-the-Rights-of-the-Child.pdf. Accessed August 20, 2016.
  27. United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. London: UNICEF.Google Scholar
  28. Von Pufendorf, S. (1673). On the Duty of Man and Citizen According to the Natural Law. Available at: http://www.lonang.com/exlibris/pufendorf/puf-203.htm. Accessed July 20, 2014.
  29. Woodhead, M. (1997). Psychology and the Cultural Construction of Children’s Needs. In A. James & A. Prout (Eds.), Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood. Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Staffordshire UniversityStoke-on-TrentUK

Personalised recommendations