Advertisement

Narrative and Healing in Dynamic Psychotherapy: Implications for Culture Theory

  • Peter G. Stromberg
Chapter
Part of the Culture, Mind, and Society book series (CMAS)

Abstract

In dynamic psychotherapies, people work to address troubling thoughts, actions, and feelings by talking about themselves and their experiences. How can such talk ameliorate mental health symptoms? This chapter proposes an answer to this question that circumvents the central barrier to answering it, the assumption that the body and the mind are two separate systems. The chapter author calls upon recent work in cognitive science that emphasizes how human beings use their bodies and their environments in thinking; in such approaches mind and body are not separable. Such work helps us to conceptualize clients in psychotherapy as shaping the environments in which they dwell through the narratives they construct. The transformation that can occur through narrative is, from this perspective, in part a consequence of how persons constitute themselves differently in different environments.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This chapter grew out of a series of discussions with Rebecca Seligman, and I would like to thank her for introducing me to a number of the ideas I present here. Robert A. Paul read the manuscript and helped me to avoid some mis-steps in my discussion of psychoanalytic concepts. Finally, the chapter has benefited enormously from repeated careful readings by Naomi Quinn. She could not fix everything, however, and the chapter’s faults are my responsibility.

References

  1. Barsalou, Lawrence W. 2010. Grounded Cognition: Past, Present, and Future. Trends in Cognitive Science 2 (4): 716–724.Google Scholar
  2. Baumann, Richard. 1986. Story, Performance and Event. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beatty, Andrew. 2010. How Did It Feel for You? Emotion, Narrative, and the Limits of Ethnography. American Anthropologist 112 (3): 430–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowlin, John, and Peter G. Stromberg. 1997. Representation and Reality in the Study of Culture. American Anthropologist 99 (1): 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruner, Jerome. 2009. Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Collins, Randall. 2004. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coplan, Amy. 2004. Empathic Engagement with Narrative Fictions. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62 (2): 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Csordas, Thomas J. 1990. Embodiment as a Paradigm for Anthropology. Ethos 18 (1): 5–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davidson, Richard J. 2003. Seven Sins in the Study of Emotion: Correctives from Affective Neuroscience. Brain and Cognition 52 (1): 129–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Decety, Jean, and Jennifer A. Stevens. 2009. Action Representation and Its Role in Social Interaction. In Handbook of Imagination and Mental Simulation, ed. K.D. Markman, W.M.P. Klein, and J.A. Suhr, 3–20. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  12. Edwards, Derek, and Jonathan Potter. 1992. Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Ekman, Paul E. Richard Sorenson, and Wallace V. Friesen. 1969. Pan-Cultural Elements in Facial Displays of Emotion. Science 164 (3875): 86–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fecica, Agnieszka M., and Daniela K. O’Neill. 2010. A Step at a Time: Preliterate Children’s Simulation of Narrative Movement During Story Comprehension. Cognition 116 (3): 368–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays by Clifford Geertz. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Gentsch, Antje, et al. 2016. Towards a Common Framework of Grounded Action Cognition: Relating Motor Control, Perception and Cognition. Cognition 146 (January): 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gibson, James J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  18. Goffman, Erving. 1986. Frame Analysis. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Goldman, Alvin I. 2005. Imitation, Mind Reading, and Simulation. In Perspectives on Imitation: From Neuroscience to Social Science, ed. S. Hurley and N. Chater, 79–93. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hacking, Ian. 2002. Mad Travelers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Herman, David. 2007. Storytelling and the Sciences of Mind: Cognitive Narratology, Discursive Psychology, and Narratives in Face-to-Face Interaction. Narrative 15 (3): 306–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hickok, Gregory. 2014. The Myth of Mirror Neurons: The Real Neuroscience of Communication and Cognition. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  23. Ingold, Tim. 2000. The Perception of the Environment. Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Ingold, Tim. 2013. Dreaming of Dragons: On the Imagination of Real Life. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 19 (4): 734–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jackson, Michael. 2002. The Politics of Storytelling. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
  26. Johnson-Laird, P.N. 1983. Mental Models. Toward a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kermode, Frank. 1979. The Genesis of Secrecy. On the Interpretation of Narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kleinman, Arthur. 1988. The Illness Narratives. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  29. Labov, William. 1972. Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Leslie, Alan M. 1987. Pretense and Representation: The Origins of ‘Theory of Mind.’ Psychological Review 94 (4): 412–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lessing, Doris. 1962. The Golden Notebook. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  33. Leys, Ruth. 2011. The Turn to Affect: A Critique. Critical Inquiry 37 (3): 434–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mar, Raymond A. 2004. The Neuropsychology of Narrative: Story Comprehension, Story Production, and Their Interrelation. Neuropsychologia 42 (10): 1414–1432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martin, Alex. 2007. The Representation of Object Concepts in the Brain. Annual Review of Psychology 58: 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Matlock, Teenie. 2004. Fictive Motion as Cognitive Simulation. Memory and Cognition 32 (8): 1389–1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mattingly, Cheryl, and Linda C. Garro. 2000. Narrative and the Cultural Construction of Illness and Healing. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  38. Ochs, Elinor and Lisa Capps. 2001. Living Narrative: Creating Lives in Everyday Storytelling. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Panksepp, Jaak, and Lucy Piven. 2012. The Archaeology of Mind: Neuroevolutionary Origins of Human Emotions. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  40. Quinn, Naomi. 1997. Research on Shared Task Solutions. In A Cognitive Theory of Cultural Meaning, ed. Claudia Strauss and Naomi Quinn, 137–188. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Rinck, Mike, and Gordon H. Bower. 1995. Anaphora Resolution and the Focus of Attention in Situation Models. Journal of Memory and Language 34 (1): 110–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rinck, Mike, Pepper Williams, Gordon H. Bower, and Erin S. Becker. 1996. Spatial Situation Models and Narrative Understanding: Some Generalizations and Extensions. Discourse Processes 21 (1): 23–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rorty, Richard. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Rosaldo, Renato. 1986. Ilongot Hunting as Story and Experience. In The Anthropology of Experience, ed. V.W. Turner and E.M. Bruner, 97–138. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  45. Schafer, Roy. 1976. A New Language for Psychoanalysis. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Schafer, Roy. 1992. Retelling a Life: Narration and Dialogue in Psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  47. Seligman, Rebecca. n.d. Conditions of Meaning: Brain and Body in Illness and Healing. Unpublished Manuscript, Files of the Author.Google Scholar
  48. Shapiro, Lawrence. 2011. Embodied Cognition. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Shifters, Linguistic Categories, and Cultural Description. In Meaning in Anthropology, ed. K. Basso and H.A. Selby, 11–55. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
  50. Spence, Donald. 1984. Narrative Truth and Historical Truth: Meaning and Interpretation in Psychoanalysis. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  51. Stromberg, Peter G. n.d. Narrative Analysis. In The Oxford Handbook of the Anthropology of Religion, ed. S. Coleman and J. Robbins. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Stromberg, Peter G. 1985. The Impression Point: Synthesis of Symbol and Self. Ethos 13: 56–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stromberg, Peter G. 1993. Language and Self-Transformation: A Study of the Christian Conversion Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Stromberg, Peter G. 2009. Caught in Play: How Entertainment Works on You. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Stromquist, Sven, and Ludo Verhoeven. 2004. Relating Events in Narrative, Volume 2: Typological and Contextual Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  56. Tomkins, Silvan. 2000 [1962]. Affect Imagery Consciousness. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  57. Turner, Victor. 1967. The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Varela, Francisco J., Evan Thompson, and Eleanor Rosch. 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  59. Weirzbicka, Anna. 1986. Human Emotions: Universal or Culture Specific? American Anthropologist 88 (3): 584–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter G. Stromberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of TulsaTulsaUSA

Personalised recommendations