Advertisement

An Overview of Sample Design and Weighting

  • Richard Valliant
  • Jill A. Dever
  • Frauke Kreuter
Chapter
Part of the Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences book series (SSBS)

Abstract

This is a practical book. Many techniques used by survey practitioners are not covered by standard textbooks but are necessary to do a professional job when designing samples and preparing data for analyses. In this book, we present a collection of methods that we have found most useful in our own practical work. Since computer software is essential in applying the techniques, example code is given throughout.

References

  1. Biemer P. P., Lyberg L. (2003). Introduction to Survey Quality. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009). National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: 1999–2010 survey content. URL https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/ContinuousNhanes/Default.aspx?BeginYear=1999
  3. Eckman S., Kreuter F. (2011). Confirmation bias in housing unit listing. Public Opinion Quarterly 75(1):139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Groves R. M., Fowler F., Couper M. P., Lepkowski J., Singer E., Tourangeau R. (2004). Survey Methodology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Iannacchione V. G. (2011). Research synthesis: The changing role of address-based sampling in surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly 75(3):556–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Iannacchione V. G., Staab J. M., Redden D. T. (2003). Evaluating the use of residential mailing lists in a metropolitan household survey. Public Opinion Quarterly 67(2):202–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kalton G., Kali J., Sigman R. (2014). Handling frame problems when address-based sampling is used for in-person household surveys. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 2:283–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kish L. (1965). Survey Sampling. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Kostanich D., Dippo C. S. (2002). Current Population Survey: Design and methodology (technical paper 63RV). Tech. rep., Census Bureau and Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  10. Kuusela V., Callegaro M., Vehovar V. (2008). The influence of mobile telephones on telephone surveys. In: Lepkowski J., Tucker N. C., Brick J. M., de Leeuw E., Japec L., Lavrakas P. J., Link M. W., Sangster R. L. (eds) Advances in Telephone Survey Methodology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, chap 4, pp 87–112.Google Scholar
  11. Link M. W., Battaglia M. P., Frankel M. R., Osborn L., Mokdad A. H. (2008). A comparison of address-based sampling (ABS) versus random-digit dialing (RDD) for general population surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly 72(1):6–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. R Core Team. (2017). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, URL https://www.R-project.org/
  13. Särndal C., Swensson B., Wretman J. (1992). Model Assisted Survey Sampling. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tourangeau R., Kreuter F., Eckman S. (2012). Motivated underreporting in screening interviews. Public Opinion Quarterly 76(3):453–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. US Census Bureau. (2002). Source and Accuracy of Estimates for Poverty in the United States: 2001. URL http://www.census.gov/prod/2002pubs/p60-219sa.pdf
  16. Valliant R., Hubbard F., Lee S., Chang W. (2014). Efficient use of commercial lists in U.S. household sampling. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 2:182–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wolter K., Smith P., Khare M. (2017). Statistical methodology of the national immunization survey, 2005–2014. Vital and Health Statistics (61), URL https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_01/sr01_061.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Valliant
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jill A. Dever
    • 3
  • Frauke Kreuter
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.University of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  3. 3.RTI InternationalWashington, DCUSA
  4. 4.University of MannheimMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations