Advertisement

CSR and Innovation: A Holistic Approach From a Business Perspective

  • Hans-Jürgen August
Chapter
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)

Abstract

Innovation as well as Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) have gained more and more importance over the past decades—both clearly affecting, if not determining competitive strength and sustainable positioning in the world of business and beyond. Serving “people, planet, and profit” has become a general requirement to companies and other organizations. Thus, the comprehensive consideration and analysis of interdependencies and possible side-effects is a key to sustainable success. This article reflects and discusses the status of CSR approaches from a business perspective, introducing easily applicable methodologies for business model innovation considering CSR aspects and for balancing related benefits and costs to find holistically optimized solutions. The business perspective is complemented by a discussion of CSR-related management system standards such as ISO 26000, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, OHSAS 18001/ISO 45001, ISO 27001, and by an overview of a real-life implementation in a high-tech company.

References

  1. Achterkamp, M., & Vos, J. (2006). A framework for making sense of sustainable innovation through stakeholder involvement. Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 6(6), 525–538.Google Scholar
  2. Ackermann, R. W., & Bauer, R. A. (1976). Corporate social responsiveness: The modern dilemna. Reston: Reston Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Acs, Z. J., & Phillips, R. J. (2002). Entrepreneurship and philanthropy in American capitalism. Small Business Economics, 19(3), 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Altenburger, R. (2013). Gesellschaftliche Verantwortung als Innovationsquelle. In R. Altenburger (Ed.), CSR und Innovationsmanagement: Gesellschaftliche Verantwortung als Innovationstreiber und Wettbewerbsvorteil. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 123–167). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  6. Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arimura, T. H., Darnall, N., Ganguli, R., & Katayama, H. (2016). The effect of ISO 14001 on environmental performance: Resolving equivocal findings. Journal of Environmental Management, 166, 556–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. August, H.-J. (2014). ‘…but rather the one most adaptable to change.’ How to set up and maintain an effective quality management system in stormy times of change. In Proceedings of the 58th EOQ Congress, Gothenburg, June 11–12, 2014.Google Scholar
  9. August, H.-J. (2015, April). Transformation meistern. Q1—Magazin für Qualitätsmanagement und Integrierte Managementsysteme, 2, 30–35.Google Scholar
  10. August, H.-J. (2017). Case study “global knowledge exchange and collaboration as key to business transformation”. In K. Jensen (Ed.), Leading global innovation: Facilitating multicultural collaboration and international market success. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. August, H.-J., & Buljubasic, T. (2012). Setting up an innovation ecosystem supporting a new organization’s strategy. In Proceedings of the XXIII ISPIM Conference, Barcelona, June 17–20, 2012.Google Scholar
  12. August, H.-J, Hohl, E. K., & Platzek, B. (2014). Creativity traits and innovation beliefs: Implications for companies and universities. In Proceedings of the XXV ISPIM Conference, Dublin, June 8–11, 2014.Google Scholar
  13. August, H.-J., Dinc, O., & Hohl, E. K. (2015). A toolbox to effectively improve an organization's innovation ecosystem. In Proceedings of the XXVI ISPIM Conference, Budapest, June 14–17, 2015.Google Scholar
  14. Bocken, N., Short, S., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2013). A value mapping tool for sustainable business modelling. Corporate Governance, 13(5), 482–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Boons, F., Montalvo, C., Quist, J., & Wagner, M. (2013). Sustainable innovation, business models and economic performance: An overview. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  18. Braungart, M., & McDonough, W. (2009). Cradle to cradle. London: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  19. Brundtland, G. (1987). Our common future. UN Brundtland Commission Report.Google Scholar
  20. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAffee, A. (2016). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York: Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  21. Burke, L., & Logsdon, J. M. (1996). How corporate social responsibility pays off. Long Range Planning, 29(4), 495–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Campos, L. M., de Melo Heizen, D. A., Verdinelli, M. A., & Miguel, P. A. C. (2015). Environmental performance indicators: A study on ISO 14001 certified companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 99, 286–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Carroll, A. B. (2008). A history of corporate social responsibility: Concepts and practices. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 19–46). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Carroll, A. B. (2015). Corporate social responsibility. Organizational Dynamics, 44(2), 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). The logic of open innovation: Managing intellectual property. California Management Review, 45(3), 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  29. Chesbrough, H. W. (2010). Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 354–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  31. Christensen, C. M., & Overdorf, M. (2000). Meeting the challenge of disruptive change. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 66–77.Google Scholar
  32. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator’s solution: Using good theory to solve the dilemmas of growth. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  33. Collins, E., Roper, J., & Lawrence, S. (2010). Sustainability practices: Trends in New Zealand businesses. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(8), 479–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dahlström, K., Howes, C., Leinster, P., & Skea, J. (2003). Environmental management systems and company performance: Assessing the case for extending risk-based regulation. European Environment, 13(4), 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dal-Bianco, E. (2015). Nachhaltigkeit messbar machen—Integration von ISO 26000 in die sustainability balanced scorecard. In A. Schneider & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility (pp. 311–324). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. Davenport, T. H., & Kirby, J. (2016). Only humans need apply: Winners and losers in the age of smart machines. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  37. Drucker, P. F. (1959). The landmarks of tomorrow. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  38. Drucker, P. F. (1994). The theory of the business. Harvard Business Review, 72(5), 95–104.Google Scholar
  39. Drucker, P. F. (1999). Knowledge worker productivity: The biggest challenge. California Management Review, 41(2), 78–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ebner, G., & Goiser, T. (2015). CSR und Risikomanagement. In A. Schneider & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility (pp. 571–580). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  41. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks. The triple bottom line of 21st century. Oxford: Capstone.Google Scholar
  42. Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1), 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Elkington, J. (2004). Enter the triple bottom line. In H. Henriques & J. Richardson (Eds.), The triple bottom line: Does it all add up? (pp. 1–16). Abingdon: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  44. Epstein, M. J., & Roy, M. J. (2003). Making the business case for sustainability. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 9(1), 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. European Commission. (2011). A renewed EU strategy 2011–14 for Corporate Social Responsibility.Google Scholar
  46. European Commission. (2012). Manifesto for a resource-efficient Europe.Google Scholar
  47. Fichter, K. (2005). Interpreneurship. Nachhaltigkeitsinnovationen in interaktiven Perspektiven eines vernetzenden Unternehmertums. Marburg: Metropolis.Google Scholar
  48. Flach, P. (2012). Machine learning: The art and science of algorithms that make sense of data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Frederick, W. C. (1960). The growing concern over business responsibility. California Management Review, 2, 54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. French, W. L., & Bell, C. H. (1994). Organisationsentwicklung: sozialwissenschaftliche Strategien zur Organisationsveränderung. Bern: Haupt.Google Scholar
  51. Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  52. Gelbmann, U., Rauter, R., Engert, S., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2013). CSR-Innovationen in kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen. In R. Altenburger (Ed.), CSR und Innovationsmanagement (pp. 31–54). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Glasl, F., & Lievegoed, B. (2004). Dynamische Unternehmensentwicklung. Bern: Haupt.Google Scholar
  54. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning (Adaptive computation and machine learning series). Boston: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  55. Grieshuber, E. (2012). CSR als Hebel für ganzheitliche Innovation. In A. Schneider & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility (pp. 371–384). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hahn, R. (2012). Standardizing social responsibility? New perspectives on guidance documents and management system standards for sustainable development. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 59(4), 717–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinske, J., & Preuss, L. (2011). Trade-offs in corporate sustainability: You can’t have your cake and eat it. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(4), 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Hamilton, J. T. (1995). Pollution as news media and stock market reactions to the toxic release inventory data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28(1), 98–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hansen, E. G. (2010). Responsible leadership systems: An empirical analysis of integrating corporate responsibility into leadership systems. Wiesbaden: Gabler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Hansen, E. G., & Grosse-Dunker, F. (2013). Sustainability-oriented innovation. In S. O. Idowu, N. Capaldi, L. Zu, & A. Das Gupta (Eds.), Encyclopedia of corporate social responsibility (pp. 2407–2417). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Hansen, E. G., Grosse-Dunker, F., & Reichwald, R. (2009). Sustainability innovation cube—A framework to evaluate sustainability-oriented innovations. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(04), 683–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 268–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Heald, M. (1970). The social responsibilities of business: Company and community 1900–1960. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  64. Hockerts, K. (2007). Managerial perceptions of the business case for corporate social responsibility. Frederiksberg: CBS Center for Corporate Social Responsibility.Google Scholar
  65. International Standards Organization. (2017). The ISO survey. https://www.iso.org/the-iso-survey.html
  66. ISO 27001. (2013). Information technology ― Security techniques ― Information security management systems ― Requirements. Geneva: ISO.Google Scholar
  67. ISO 9000. (2015). Quality management systems—Fundamentals and vocabulary. Geneva: ISO.Google Scholar
  68. ISO 9001. (2015). Quality management systems—Requirements. Geneva: ISO.Google Scholar
  69. ISO 14001. (2015). Environmental management systems. Geneva: ISO.Google Scholar
  70. ISO 26000. (2010). Guidance on social responsibility. Geneva: ISO.Google Scholar
  71. ISO 45001. (2018). Occupational health and safety management systems. Geneva: ISO.Google Scholar
  72. Jones, P., & Upward, A. (2014). Caring for the future: The systemic design of flourishing enterprises. In The Third Symposium of Relating Systems Thinking and Design (2014, RSD3) (pp. 1–8).Google Scholar
  73. Jørgensen, T. H., Remmen, A., & Mellado, M. D. (2006). Integrated management systems—Three different levels of integration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(8), 713–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Joyce, A., & Paquin, R. L. (2016). The triple layered business model canvas: A tool to design more sustainable business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 1474–1486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 1992, 71–79.Google Scholar
  76. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  77. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (1999). Creating new market space. Harvard Business Review, 77(1), 83–93.Google Scholar
  78. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Blue Ocean strategy: How to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  79. Kohlöffel, K. M., & August, H.-J. (2012). Veränderungskonzepte und strategische Transformation: Trends, Krisen, Innovationen als Chancen nutzen. Erlangen: Wiley.Google Scholar
  80. Korschun, D., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Swain, S. D. (2014). Corporate social responsibility, customer orientation, and the job performance of frontline employees. Journal of Marketing, 78, 20–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Kotter, J. P. (1978). Organizational dynamics—Diagnosis and intervention. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  82. Kurucz, E. C., Colbert, B. A., & Wheeler, D. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 83–112). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Leonard, D., & Rayport, J. F. (1997). Spark innovation through empathic design. Harvard Business Review, 75, 102–115.Google Scholar
  84. Littman, J., & Peters, T. (2001). The art of innovation: Lessons in creativity from IDEO, America’s leading design firm. New York: Currency.Google Scholar
  85. Lorentschitsch, B., & Walker, T. (2015). Vom integrierten zum integrativen CSR-Managementansatz. In A. Schneider & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility (pp. 299–310). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  86. Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  87. McGuire, J. W. (1963). Business and society. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  88. Obst, L. (2015). Utilizing the business model canvas to enable sustainability measurement on the business model level: An indicator framework supplementing the business model canvas (Master thesis). University of Twente, Twente.Google Scholar
  89. OHSAS 18001. (2007). Occupational health and safety assessment series. London: British Standards Institute.Google Scholar
  90. Osterwalder, A. (2004). The business model ontology—A proposition in a design science approach (Thesis). Université de Lausanne, Lausanne.Google Scholar
  91. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  92. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2011). Aligning profit and purpose through business model innovation. In G. Palazzo & M. Wentland (Eds.), Responsible management practices for the 21st century (pp. 61–76). Paris: Pearson International.Google Scholar
  93. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci, C. L. (2005). Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16(1), 1.Google Scholar
  94. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Bernarda, G., & Smith, A. (2014). Value proposition design: How to create products and services customers want. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  95. Perera, O. (2008). How material is ISO 26000 social responsibility to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)? Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
  96. Peters, T. J., & Waterman, R. H. (1982). In search of excellence. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  97. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.Google Scholar
  98. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2008). Strategy & society—The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. In M. E. Porter (Ed.), On competition (p. 479). Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  99. Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995a). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995b). Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120–133.Google Scholar
  101. Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2005). Green clubs and voluntary governance: ISO 14001 and firms’ regulatory compliance. American Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Rahman, S. (2011). Evaluation of definitions: Ten dimensions of corporate social responsibility. World Review of Business Research, 1(1), 166–176.Google Scholar
  103. Revell, A., Stokes, D., & Chen, H. (2010). Small businesses and the environment: Turning over a new leaf? Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(5), 273–288.Google Scholar
  104. Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar
  105. Schaltegger, S. (2015). Die Beziehung zwischen CSR und Corporate Sustainability. In A. Schneider & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility (pp. 199–209). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  106. Schaltegger, S., & Hasenmüller, P. (2006). Nachhaltiges Wirtschaften aus Sicht des “Business Case of Sustainability”. In E. Tiemeyer & K. Wilbers (Eds.), Berufliche Bildung für nachhaltiges Wirtschaften. Konzepte, Curricula, Methoden, Beispiele (pp. 71–86). Bielefeld.Google Scholar
  107. Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E. G. (2012). Business cases for sustainability: The role of business model innovation for corporate sustainability. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 6(2), 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Schmidpeter, R. (2015). Unternehmerische Verantwortung—Hinführung und Überblick. In A. Schneider & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility (pp. 1–21). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  109. Schmiedeknecht, M. H., & Wieland, J. (2015). ISO 26000, 7 Grundsätze, 6 Kernthemen. In A. Schneider & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility (pp. 299–310). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  110. Schneider, A. (2015). Reifegradmodell CSR—eine Begriffsklärung und–abgrenzung. In A. Schneider & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility (pp. 22–42). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  111. Schwartz, B., & Tilling, K. (2009). ‘ISO-lating’corporate social responsibility in the organizational context: A dissenting interpretation of ISO 26000. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(5), 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Schweitzer, J. (2014). Leadership and innovation capability development in strategic alliances. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 35(5), 442–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Sethi, S. P. (1975). Dimensions of corporate social performance: An analytic framework. California Management Review, 17, 58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Siemens. (2017). hi!tech, 1.Google Scholar
  116. Siemens Annual Report. (2016). Accessible via the Siemens website.Google Scholar
  117. Siemens Sustainability Report. (2016). Accessible via the Siemens website.Google Scholar
  118. Siemens Press Release. (2016, June 28). Siemens founds next47 as separate unit for startupsGoogle Scholar
  119. Smith, N. C. (2002). Corporate social responsibility: Not whether, but how? Centre for marketing working paper. London: London Business School.Google Scholar
  120. Teece, D. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 172–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Upward, A. (2013). Towards an ontology and canvas for strongly sustainable business models: A systemic design science exploration. Toronto: York University.Google Scholar
  122. Upward, A., & Jones, P. (2016). An ontology for strongly sustainable business models: Defining an enterprise framework compatible with natural and social science. Organization and Environment, 29(1), 97–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  124. Votaw, D., & Sethi, S. P. (1973). The corporate dilemma: Traditional values versus contemporary problems. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  125. Wren, D. A. (2005). The history of management thought. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans-Jürgen August
    • 1
  1. 1.TTTech Computertechnik AGViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations