Advertisement

Time and Space in Brazilian Urban Children’s Plays: Ludic Possibilities of Digital Technologies

  • Bianca Becker
  • Fabrício Souza
  • Ilka Dias Bichara
Chapter

Abstract

Play is a cultural practice marked both by the context in which it is manifested and by the active protagonism of the children involved in it. The current urban social context is strongly marked by the massive presence of digital technologies and also by the phenomenon of institutionalizing the routines of children in enclosed spaces away from the dangers of the street. The broad access to digital technologies in the children’s routine and the constitution of a widely connected culture, associated to the phenomenon of the internalization of childhood, provide conditions for the emergence of ludic practices influenced by digital technologies, especially for the opportunity of contact with peers through mobile communication devices. Considering children the actors who interact using the rules from their social context and also reinterpret, renegotiate, and even create new rules of interaction, this chapter discusses the uses and forms of appropriation of digital technologies in play activities, as well as the process of constitution of a ludic culture according to the perspective of the children themselves. In this sense, the purpose of this chapter is to analyze the appropriations of the dimensions of time and space used by Brazilian children in the establishment and continuity of playful episodes over time and in different spaces.

Keywords

Play and technology Play culture Play and context Interpretative reproduction 

References

  1. Almeida, A. N. (2012). Childhood, children, internet: Challenges in the digital age. In A. Delicado, A. N. Almeida, A. Prout, C. Sigalés, C. Ponte, et al. (Eds.), Childhood, children, internet: Challenges in the digital era. Lisbon, Portugal: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.Google Scholar
  2. Almeida, A. N., Delicado, A., Alves, N. A., Carvalho, T., & Carvalho, D. (2015). Digital infants. Lisbon, Portugal: Calouste Gulbenkian Fundation.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, B. L. (2013). Playing on the web: Play activities developed by children aged 5 to 12 years on the internet (Masters dissertation). Federal University of Bahia/UFBA, Salvador, BA. Available at: https://pospsi.ufba.br/sites/pospsi.ufba.br/files/bianca_lepikson.pdf
  4. Becker, B. L. (2017). Childhood, technology, and ludic: The vision of children on the creative appropriations of digital technologies and the establishment of a contemporary ludic culture (Doctoral thesis). Federal University of Bahia/UFBA, Salvador, BA. Available at: https://repositorio.ufba.br/ri/handle/ri/23851
  5. Bichara, I. D. (2006). Delimitation of space as a basic rule in games and street games. In E. Bomtempo, E. G. Antunha, & V. B. de Oliveira (Orgs) (Eds.), Playing in school, in the hospital, on the street... (pp. 173–189). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Wak Ed.Google Scholar
  6. Bichara, I. D., Lordelo, E., Carvalho, A. M., & Otta, E. (2009). Play or play: That is the question: The perspective of evolutionary psychology on the game. In M. E. Yamamoto & Otta, E. (Orgs) (Eds.), Evolutionary psychology (pp. 104–113). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Guanabara Koogan.Google Scholar
  7. Bichara, I. D., Modesto, J. G. N., France, D. A., Medeiros, S. S., & Cotrim, G. S. (2011). External spaces to play: The children’s look through photos. Psychology: Theory and Practice, 13(3), 167–179.Google Scholar
  8. Caron, A. H., & Caronia, L. (2007). Moving cultures: Mobile communication in everyday life. Québec, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Carvalho, A. M. A. & Pedrosa, M. I. (2003). Ceiling, nest, territory: Little house plays. In A. M. A Carvalho, C. M. C Magalhães, F. A. R. Bridges, & I. D. Bichara (Orgs) (Eds.), Play and culture: Traveling through Brazil that plays (vol. II, Games of all times, pp. 31–48). São Paulo, Brazil: House of the Psychologist.Google Scholar
  10. Carvalho, A. M. A., & Pedrosa, M. I. (2004). Territoriality and social construction of space in children’s play. Ethnology Review, 6(1), 63–69.Google Scholar
  11. Castells, M. (2005). The network society. Vol. I; 8a ed. Trad. Roneide Vanancio Majer with the collaboration of Klauss Brandini Gerhardt. São Paulo, Brazil: Peace and Earth.Google Scholar
  12. Chaudhary, N., & Shukla, S. (2015). Children’s work is to play: Beliefs and practices related to childhood play among Indians. In J. L. Roopnarine, M. M. Patte, J. E. Johnson, & D. Kuschner (Eds.), International perspectives on children’s play. Maidenhead, Berkshire: McGraw Hill Education, Open University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Corsaro, W. A. (2004). We are friends, right? Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, November 2004(33), 670–671.Google Scholar
  14. Corsaro, W. A. (2011). Sociology of childhood. Porto Alegre, Brazil: Artmed.Google Scholar
  15. Cotrim, G. S., & Bichara, I. D. (2013). Playing in the urban environment: Limits and possibilities in streets and playgrounds of a metropolis. Psychology: Reflection and Critique, 26(2), 388–395.Google Scholar
  16. Cotrim, G. S., Fiaes, C. S., Marques, R. L., & Bichara, I. D. (2009). Urban spaces for (and of) games: An exploratory study in the city of Salvador (BA). Psychology: Theory and Practice, 11(1), 50–61.Google Scholar
  17. Couto, E. (2013). Childhood and playing in digital culture. Perspectiva, Florianópolis, 31(3), 897–916 set./dez.Google Scholar
  18. Geser, H. (2005). Is the cell phone undermining the social order? Understanding mobile technology from a sociological perspective. In P. Glotz, S. Bertshi, & C. Locke (Eds.), Thumb Culture: the meaning of mobile phones for society. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
  19. Gosso, Y., Bichara, I. D., & Carvalho, A. M. A. (2014). Brasilian children at play: Reviewing relationships between play and culture. In J. L. Roopnarine, M. M. Patte, J. E. Johnson, & D. Kuschner (Eds.), International perspectives on children’s play (pp. 23–35). Berkshire, UK: Open University Press/McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  20. Gosso, Y., Otta, E., & Morais, M. L. S. (2007). Pretend play of Brazilian children: A window into different cultural worlds. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 539–558.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022107305237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huizinga, J. (1996) Homo Ludens: The game as an element of culture. Trad. João Paulo Monteiro. 4ª. Ed. São Paulo, Brazil: Perspective.Google Scholar
  22. Hulme, M., & Trunch, A. (2005). The role of interspace in sustaining an identity. In P. Glotz, S. Bertshi, & C. Locke (Eds.), Thumb culture: the meaning of mobile phones for society. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
  23. Internet Steering Committee in Brazil – CGI.br. (2014). TIC Kids Online Brasil 2014.Coord. Alexandre F. Barbosa. São Paulo: CGI.br, 2014. Available at: http://cetic.br/pesquisa/kids-online/
  24. Jenkins, H. (2008). Culture of convergence. Trad. Suzana Alexandria. São Paulo, Brazil: Aleph.Google Scholar
  25. Karsten, L., & Vliet, W. (2006). Children in the city: Reclaiming the street. Environments, 16(1), 151–167.Google Scholar
  26. Kawashima, L. B., Gomes, L. A., & Gomes, C. F. (2008). Squares, streets, and university: A look at the games and jokes in public spaces. UFMT. Available at: http://www.imve.org.br/concoce/trabalhos/comunicacoes/pracas_ruas_e_universidade_um_olhar_sobre_os_jogos.pdf. Last accessed on 15/09/2010.
  27. Lemos, A. (2004). Cyberculture, technology and social life in contemporary culture. Porto Alegre, Brazil: Sulina.Google Scholar
  28. Lévy, P. (1999). Cyberculture. Trad. Carlos Irineu da Costa. São Paulo: Publisher 34.Google Scholar
  29. Linne, J. (2014). Two generations of digital natives. Intercom – RBCC. São Paulo, 37(2), 203–221, jul./dec.Google Scholar
  30. Marsh, J. (2010). Young childrenʼs play in online virtual worlds. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 8(1), 23–39.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X09345406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Menezes, S. (2014). A. Interação criança/contexto escolar: a construção de “lugares de crianças” através das brincadeiras espontâneas (Dissertação de Mestrado). Universidade Federal da Bahia/UFBA, Salvador, BA.Google Scholar
  32. Morais, M. L. S. & Otta, E. (2003). Entre a Serra e o Mar. Em: Carvalho, A. M. A., Magalhães, C. M. C., Pontes, F. A. R., & Bichara, I. D. Brincadeira e Cultura: Viajando pelo Brasil que Brinca. vol. 1: o Brasil que Brinca. São Paulo, Brazil: Casa do Psicólogo.Google Scholar
  33. Pellegrini, A. D., & Smith, P. K. (1998). The development of play during childhood: Forms and possible functions. Child Psychology & Psychiatry Review, 3(2), 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rasmussen, K. (2004). Places for children – children’s places. Childhood A Global Journal of Child Research, 11(2), 155–173 Roopnarine, Patte, Johnson, & Kuschner, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Seixas, A. A., Becker, B., & Bichara, I. D. (2012) Reprodução Interpretativa e Cultura de Pares nos Grupos de Brincadeira da Ilha dos Frades/BA. Psico, Porto Alegre, PUCRS, 43(4), 541–551, out./dez.Google Scholar
  36. Sousa, P. V. B. (2016). A Localização em Rede: integração, usos e apropriações de recursos georreferenciais em redes sociais digitais. Tese de Doutorado. Universidade Federal da Bahia/UFBA, Salvador, BA.Google Scholar
  37. Turkle, S. (2008). Always-on/always-on-you: The tethered self. In E. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of mobile communication studies (pp. 121–138). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bianca Becker
    • 1
  • Fabrício Souza
    • 1
  • Ilka Dias Bichara
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Psychology – Federal University of BahiaSalvadorBrazil

Personalised recommendations