Advertisement

The New Paradigm of Digital Proximity for Cooperative Banks

  • Tiphaine Gorlier
  • Géraldine Michel
  • Valérie Zeitoun
Chapter

Abstract

Relations of proximity are a core issue to cooperative banks. This chapter demonstrates how and where these relations, presently developed on an individual basis between bank employees and clients, could evolve towards a new paradigm where the brand becomes a lever for enduring relations. Based on two qualitative studies, the research shows how digitalization can be a lever for competence capable of both generating and nourishing positive relations, and how brand activation, based on shared cooperative principles and specific values, can become the symbolic platform upon which enduring proximity can be constructed from the institutional point of view between both the client and the bank and the employee and the bank.

Keywords

Cooperative banks Proximity Digitalization Digital banking Brand Bank-client relationship 

References

  1. Ainsworth, M. D., Bell, S. M., & Stayton, D. J. (1971). Individual Differences in Strange-Situation Behavior of One-Year-Olds. In The Origins of Human Social Relations (pp. 17–58). London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ainsworth, M. D., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1997). Self-Expansion Motivation and Including other in the Self. In Handbook of Personal Relationships (Vol. 2, pp. 251–270). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
  4. Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Norman, C. (2001). Self-Expansion Model of Motivation and Cognition in Close Relationships and Beyond. In M. Clark & G. Fletcher (Eds.), Blackwell’s Handbook of Social Psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Berger-Remy, F., & Michel, G. (2015). How Brand Gives Employees Meaning: Towards an Extended View of Brand Equity. Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 30(3), 1–25.Google Scholar
  6. Bouba-Olga, O., & Grossetti, M. (2008). Socio-Economie de Proximité. Revue d’Economie Régionale and Urbaine.Google Scholar
  7. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss: Attachment (Vol. 1). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and Loss: Separation (Vol. 2). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and Loss: Loss, Sadness and Depression (Vol. 3). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  10. Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-Report Measurement of Adult Romantic Attachment: An Integrative Overview. In Attachment Theory and Close Relationships (pp. 46–76). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  11. Byrne, D. E. (1971). The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gilly, J.-P., & Torre, A. (2000). Dynamiques de Proximité. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  13. Gorlier T. (2017). Comment Les Marques Créent-Elles de la Proximité? Apport des Théories de l’Expansion de Soi et de l’Attachement. PhD dissertation, Sorbonne Business School, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
  14. Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. Hove: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., & Levinger, G. (1983). Close Relationships. New York, NY: Freeman.Google Scholar
  16. Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., & Levinger, G. (2000). Close Relationships. New York, NY: Percheron.Google Scholar
  17. Le Boulch, G. (2001). Approche Systémique de la Proximité: Définitions et Discussion. IIIèmes Journées de la Proximité, Université Paris IX Dauphine.Google Scholar
  18. Laut, J.-L. (1998). Proximité et Commerce: pour l’Eclairage du Concept. Communication et Langages, 116, 92–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marin, L., & Ruiz, S. (2007). I Need You Too! Corporate Identity Attractiveness for Consumers and the Role of Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(3), 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mende, M., & Bolton, R. N. (2011). Why Attachment Security Matters. Journal of Service Research, 14(3), 285–301.Google Scholar
  21. Michel, G. (2017). Au Cœur de la Marque, les Clés du Management de la Marque (3rd ed.). Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
  22. Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  23. Paulssen, M. (2009). Attachment Orientations in Business-to-Business Relationships. Psychology and Marketing, 26(6), 507–533.Google Scholar
  24. Perez, R. C. (2009). Effects of Perceived Identity Based on Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Consumer Identification with the Company. Corporate Reputation Review, 12(2), 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pierce, T., & Lydon, J. (1998). Priming Relational Schemas: Effects of Contextually Activated and Chronically Accessible Interpersonal Expectations on Responses to a Stressful Event. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1441–1448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rallet, A., & Torre, A. (2004). Proximité et Localisation. Economie Rurale, 280, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tiphaine Gorlier
    • 1
  • Géraldine Michel
    • 2
  • Valérie Zeitoun
    • 2
  1. 1.IPAG Business SchoolParisFrance
  2. 2.IAE Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Sorbonne Business School)ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations