Balancing Prevention and Protection: Child Protection in England

  • Nina BiehalEmail author
Part of the Child Maltreatment book series (MALT, volume 8)


This chapter presents an analysis of the child protection system in England today. It begins with a discussion of how the policies and priorities which have shaped the system have developed over time and traces the ways in which policy has sought to resolve the continuing tension at the heart of state intervention in family life, that is, the need to balance the needs and rights of children and the rights of parents. The chapter outlines the legal and institutional frameworks that underpin child protection activity today and examines the key policy principles that govern practice, including partnership with parents, the need to ensure stability and permanence for children removed from their parents and the associated need to avoid delay in decision-making. It then charts the current operation of the system through an analysis of patterns of intervention, including assessment, voluntary intervention, child protection plans and compulsory intervention in the form of court-ordered placement in out of home care. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the challenges that children, families and the English child welfare system currently face as a result of the government austerity programme.


  1. Action for Children, National Children’s Bureau, & The Children’s Society. (2016). Losing in the long run. Trends in early intervention funding. London: Action for Children, National Children’s Bureau & The Children’s Society.Google Scholar
  2. Aldgate, J., & Tunstill, J. (1995). Making sense of section 17. Implementing services for children in need within the Children Act 1989. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  3. All Party Parliamentary Group For Children. (2017). No good options. Report of the inquiry into children’s social care in England. London: National Children’s Bureau.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, G. (2011a). Early intervention: Smart investment, massive savings. London: HM Government.Google Scholar
  5. Allen, G. (2011b). Early intervention: The next steps. London: HM Government.Google Scholar
  6. Audit Commission. (1994). Seen but not heard – Co-ordinating community child health and social services for children in need within the Children Act 1989. London: The Audit Commission.Google Scholar
  7. Ball, C. (1998). Regulating child care: From the Children Act 1948 to the present day. Child & Family Social Work, 3, 163–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belsky, J., & De Haan, M. (2011). Parenting and children’s brain development: The end of the beginning. Journal of Child Psychology And Psychiatry, 52, 409–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berridge, D., Biehal, N., & Henry, L. (2012). Living in children’s residential homes. London: Department for Education.Google Scholar
  10. Biehal, N. (2005). Working with adolescents at risk of out of home care: The effectiveness of specialist teams. Children and Youth Services Review, 27, 1045–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Biehal, N. (2014). Maltreatment in foster care: A review of the evidence. Child Abuse Review, 23, 48–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bradshaw, J., Garnham, A., Lister, R., & Shaw, M. (2016). Improving children’s life chances. London: Child Poverty Action Group.Google Scholar
  13. Brookes, C., & Brocklehurst, P. (2014). Safeguarding pressures Phase 4. Manchester: Association of Directors of Children’s Services.Google Scholar
  14. Brookes, C., Brocklehurst, P., & Ellis, A. (2016). Safeguarding pressures Phase 5. Manchester: Association of Directors of Children’s Services.Google Scholar
  15. Brown, R., & Ward, H. (2012). Decision-making within a child’s timeframe. An overview of current research evidence for family justice professionals concerning child development and the impact of maltreatment. London: Department for Education.Google Scholar
  16. Bywaters, P., Brady, G., Bunting, L., Daniel, B., Featherstone, B., Jones, C., Morris, K., Scourfield, J., Sparks, T., & Webb, C. (2018). Inequalities in English child protection practice under austerity: A universal challenge? Child & Family Social Work, 23(1), 53–61.Google Scholar
  17. Carter, R. J. (2015). Council spending on essential items for children in need rose 20% under coalition Community CareNovember 25th.
  18. Department for Education. (2010). Children looked after by local authorities including adoption: 2009–10. London: Department for Education.Google Scholar
  19. Department for Education. (2015). Children Act 1989: Care planning, placement and case review. London: Department for Education.Google Scholar
  20. Department for Education. (2016a). Characteristics of children in need: 2015 to 2016 Sfr 52/2016. London: National Statistics.Google Scholar
  21. Department for Education. (2016b). Children looked after in England (including adoption) year ending 31 March 2016 Sfr 41/2016. London: Department for Education.Google Scholar
  22. Department for Education. (2017a). Children looked after in England including adoption: 2016 to 2017. London: Department for Education.Google Scholar
  23. Department for Education. (2017b). Planned expenditure on schools, education and children’s services by local authorities in England, 2017–18. Sfr 48/2017, 21 September 2017. London: Department for Education.Google Scholar
  24. Department for Education and Skills. (2002). The Children Act report 2002. London: Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
  25. Department for Education and Skills. (2004). Every child matters: Change for children. Norwich: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  26. Department of Health. (1995). Child protection. Messages from the research. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  27. Fanshel, D., & Shinn, E. (1978). Children in foster care: A longitudinal investigation. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Ferguson, H. (2011). Child protection practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fisher, M. A., Marsh, P., & Phillips, D. (1986). In and out of care. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
  30. Fox-Harding, L. (1991). Perspectives in child care policy. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
  31. Frost, N., & Parton, N. (2009). Understanding children’s social care. Politics, policy and practice. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Godar, R. (2017). Child protection – A review of the literature on current systems and practice. London: Research In Practice/Early Intervention Foundation/Local Government Foundation.Google Scholar
  33. Goldstein, J., Freud, A., & Solnit, A. (1973). Beyond the best interests of the child. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hall, E., & Guy, J. (2009). The Baby Peter effect and the increase in section 31 Care Order applications. London: CAFCASS.Google Scholar
  35. Harwin, J., & Madge, N. (2010). The concept of significant harm in law and practice. Journal of Children’s Services, 5(2), 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Heywood, J. (1978). Children in care. The development of the service for the deprived child. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  37. HM Government. (2015). Working together to safeguard children. A guide to inter-agency working to safeguard and promote the welfare of children. London: Department for Education.Google Scholar
  38. Holman, B. (1988). Putting families first. prevention and childcare. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hughes, R. (1998). Children Act 1948 and 1989: Similarities, differences, continuities. Child & Family Social Work, 3, 149–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jack, G., & Stepney, P. (1995). The Children Act 1989 – Protection or persecution? Family support and child protection in the 1990s. Critical Social Policy, 43, 26–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jay, A. (2014). Independent inquiry into child sexual exploitation in Rotherham (1997–2013). Rotherham: Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council.Google Scholar
  42. Jones, R. (2014). The story of Baby P. setting the record straight. Bristol: The Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kempe, C., Silverman, F., Steele, B., Droegemueller, W., & Silver, H. (1962). The battered child syndrome. Journal of The American Medical Association, 81, 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lord Laming. (2003). The Victoria Climbie inquiry: Report of an inquiry by Lord Laming (Cm 5730). London: Department for Education and Skills/The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  45. Lord Laming. (2009). The protection of children in England: A progress report. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  46. Macleod, S., Hart, R., Jeffes, J., & Wilkin, A. (2010). The impact of the Baby Peter case on applications for Care Orders. Slough: NFER.Google Scholar
  47. Maluccio, A., & Fein, E. (1983). Permanency planning: A redefinition. Child Welfare, 62, 195–201.Google Scholar
  48. Masson, J., Dickens, J., Bader, K., Garside, L., & Young, J. (2017). How is the PLO working? What is its impact on court process and outcome? Family Law Week, 17th February.Google Scholar
  49. Munro, E. (2011). The Munro review of child protection: Final report. A child-centred system. London: Department for Education.Google Scholar
  50. Parker, R. (1980). Caring for separated children. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Parton, N. (2005). Safeguarding childhood. Early intervention and surveillance in late modern society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  52. Price, J., & Spencer, S. (2015). Safeguarding children from destitution: Local authority responses to families with ‘No recourse to public funds’ COMPAS. Oxford: University Of Oxford.Google Scholar
  53. Puffett, N. (2016). DfE: ‘No Link’ between spending on children’s social care and quality, Children and Young People Now, January 12th.
  54. Radford, L., Corral, S., Bradley, C., & Fisher, H. L. (2013). The prevalence and impact of child maltreatment and other types of victimization in the UK: Findings from a population survey of caregivers, children and young people and young adults. Child Abuse & Neglect, 37, 801–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rowe, J., & Lambert, L. (1973). Children who wait. London: Association of British Adoption and Fostering Agencies.Google Scholar
  56. Rowlands, J., & Statham, J. (2009). Numbers of children looked after in England: A historical analysis. Child & Family Social Work, 14, 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Secretary of State for Social Services. (1974). Report of the inquiry into the care and supervision provided in relation to Maria Colwell. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  58. Sen, R., Kendrick, A., Milligan, I., & Hawthorn, M. (2008). Lessons learnt? Abuse in residential child care in Scotland. Child & Family Social Work, 13, 411–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stevenson, L. (2017). Four in ten children’s services unable to meet legal duties due to funding pressures, finds survey. Community Care, October 31st.
  60. Thoburn, J. (2010). Achieving safety, stability and belonging for children in out-of-home care. The search for ‘What Works’ across national boundaries. International Journal of Child and Family Welfare, 12, 34–48.Google Scholar
  61. Trussell Trust. (2017). UK foodbank use continues to rise as new report highlights growing impact of universal credit rollout on foodbanks, 25th April. Scholar
  62. Woolgar, M. (2013). The practical implications of the emerging findings in the neurobiology of maltreatment for looked after and adopted children: Recognising the diversity of outcomes. Adoption And Fostering, 37, 237–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of YorkYorkUK

Personalised recommendations