Advertisement

On Some of the Challenges of Teaching Formal English Linguistics

  • Maria Aurelia Cotfas
Chapter
Part of the Multilingual Education book series (MULT, volume 27)

Abstract

The chapter sets out to discuss the challenges of teaching formal linguistics to non-native (Romanian) students majoring in English (undergraduate level) at the Faculty of Foreign Languages and Literatures, University of Bucharest. Within an international setting which lays less and less emphasis on formal (grammar) teaching, advocating for a more communicative approach to language learning, one that focuses on language function rather than form, our study argues in favour of the idea that – at least at undergraduate level and for students training to be teachers or translators – a sound familiarization with theoretical concepts and frameworks is a necessity which can make the difference between professionals and amateurs.

Keywords

Teaching Linguistics English majors Undergraduate level 

References

  1. Adger, D. (2003). Core syntax. A minimalist approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Avram, L. (2006). English syntax. The structure of root clauses. Bucureşti: Oscar Print.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, M. C. (2002). The atoms of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Carnie, A. (2013). Syntax. A generative introduction (3rd ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar
  6. Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cornilescu, A. (1995). Concepts of modern grammar. A generative perspective. București: Editura Universității din București.Google Scholar
  8. Geană, I. (2013). Teaching the Romanian conditional to students of other languages. In Procedia-social and behavioral sciences by ELSEVIER. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042813001833
  9. Haegeman, L. (2006). Thinking syntactically. A guide to argumentation and analysis. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Pinker, S. (2000). The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: Perennial Classics.Google Scholar
  11. Radford, A. (2004). Minimalist syntax. Exploring the structure of English. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Swan, M. (1985a). A critical look at the communicative approach (1). ELT Journal, 39(1), 2–12 Available at https://academic.oup.com/eltj/article-abstract/39/1/2/488669/A-critical-look-at-the-Communicative-Approach-1?redirectedFrom=fulltext.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Swan, M. (1985b). A critical look at the communicative approach (2). ELT Journal, 39(2), 76–87 Available at https://academic.oup.com/eltj/article-abstract/39/2/76/443215/A-Critical-look-at-the-Communicative-Approach-2?redirectedFrom=fulltext.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Aurelia Cotfas
    • 1
  1. 1.English Department, Faculty of Foreign Languages and LiteraturesUniversity of BucharestBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations