Advertisement

Using SSM in Project Management: Aligning Objectives and Outcomes in Organizational Change Projects

  • Lee SarnoeEmail author
  • Alberto Paucar-Caceres
  • Rosane PaganoEmail author
  • María Castellini
Chapter

Abstract

This paper aims to contribute to the use of Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) in project management, by exploring what happens in real-world organizational change projects when stakeholders seem to agree to a set of initial-objectives and final-outcomes of the project. SSM Analyses are then used to explore the misalignments between initial-objectives and final-outcomes along the project life cycle. Initial results suggest that SSM helps to ‘shadow’ these misalignments when structuring an unclear complex situation such as organizational change projects and that the application of SSM facilitates negotiations, generates debate, understanding, and learning. This leads to meaningful collaboration among stakeholders and enables key changes to be introduced reflecting on the potential misalignments. Results also support SSM analysis of changes in role, norms, or value adversely influencing project outcome.

Keywords

Soft system methodology Stakeholder management Organizational change projects Value management Soft OR 

References

  1. Ashkanasy, N. M., Wilderom, C., & Peterson, M. F. (2011). The Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, S., & Morse, S. (2013). Rich Pictures: A Means to Explore the ‘Sustainable Mind’? Sustainable Development, 21, 30–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blackmore, T. K., et al. (1998). Identification of the Second Heparin-Binding Domain in Human Complement Factor H. The Journal of Immunology, 160, 3342–3348.Google Scholar
  4. Bulow, I. (1989). The Bounding of a Problem Situation and the Concept of a Systems Boundary in Soft Systems Methodology. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 16, 35–41.Google Scholar
  5. Checkland, P. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Checkland, P. (1999). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice: A 30-year Retrospective. Chichester: J. Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  7. Checkland, P. (2000). Soft Systems Methodology: A Thirty Year Retrospective. Systems Research and Behavioural Science, 17(S1), S11–S58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2006). Learning for Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology and Its Use for Practitioners, Teachers and Students. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Checkland, P., & Scholes, J. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Checkland, P., & Winter, M. (2006). Process and Content: Two Ways of Using SSM. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57, 1435–1441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Feather, J., & Sturges, P. (2003). International Encyclopedia of Information and Library Science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Furnell, S. (2008). Securing Information and Communications Systems Principles, Technologies, and Applications. Boston: Artech House. http://public.eblib.com/EBLPublic/PublicView.do?ptiID=456881
  13. Hanafizadeh, P., & Mehrabioun, M. (2017). Application of SSM in Tackling Problematical Situations from Academicians’ Viewpoints. Systems Practice and Action Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-017-9422-y.
  14. Ho, K. K. J., & Sculli, D. (1994). Organization Theory and Soft Systems Methodologies. Journal of Management Development, 13(7), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621719410063413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huaxia, Z. (2010). Soft Systems Methodology and ‘Soft’ Philosophy of Science. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 27, 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ivanov, K. (1991). Critical Systems Thinking and information Technology: Some Summary Reflections, Doubts, and Hopes Through Critical Thinking Critically Considered, and Through Hypersystems. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 18, 39–55.Google Scholar
  17. Jackson, M. (2001). Critical Systems Thinking and Practice. European Journal of Operational Research, 128(2), 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kenett, R. S., & Baker, E. (2010). Process Improvement and CMMI® for Systems and Software. Florida: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Koskela, T., Puustinen, S., Salonen, V., & Mutikainen, P. (2002). Resistance and Tolerance in a Host Plant–Holoparasitic Plant Interaction: Genetic Variation and Costs. Evolution, 56, 899–908.Google Scholar
  20. Kotiadis, K., & Mingers, J. (2006). Combining PSMs with Hard OR Methods: The Philosophical and Practical Challenges. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57, 856–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lane, D. C., & Oliva, R. (1998). The Greater Whole: Towards a Synthesis of System Dynamics and Soft Systems Methodology. European Journal of Operational Research, 107(1), 214–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lewis, P. (1994). Information-Systems Development. London: Pitman.Google Scholar
  23. Mingers, J., & Brocklesby, J. (1997). Multimethodology: Towards a Framework for Mixing Methodologies. OMEGA, The International Journal of Management Science, 25, 489–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mingers, J., & White, L. (2010). A Review of the Recent Contribution of Systems Thinking to Operational Research and Management Science. European Journal of Operational Research, 207, 1147–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moores, T. T. (2000). Cultural Problems in Applying SSM for IS Development. Journal of Global Information Management, 8(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ormerod, R. (2006). The History and Ideas of Pragmatism. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(8), 892–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pala, O., Vennix, J. A. M., & van Mullekom, T. (2003). Validity in SSM: Neglected Areas. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(7), 706–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Palmer, I., & Dunford, R. (1996). Conflicting Uses of Metaphors: Reconceptualising Their Use in the Field of Organizational Change. Academy of Management Review, 21(3), 691–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Paucar-Caceres, A., & Rodriguez-Ulloa, R. (2007). An Application of Soft Systems Dynamics Methodology (SSDM). Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58(6), 701–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pidd, M. (2007). Making Sure You Tackle the Right Problem: Linking Hard and Soft Methods in Simulation Practice. In Proceedings of the 2007 Winter Simulation Conference (Vols. 1–5, pp. 183–192).Google Scholar
  31. Shankar, R., Acharia, S., & Baveja, A. (2009). Soft-System Knowledge Management Framework for New Product Development. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(1), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910931224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Silvius, A. J. G., Schipper, R., & Nedeski, S. (2012). Sustainability in Project Management: Reality Bites. In 26th IPMA World Congress, Crete (pp. 1053–1061).Google Scholar
  33. Tajino, A., & Smith, C. (2005). Exploratory Practice and Soft Systems Methodology. Language Teaching Research, 9(4), 448–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tavares, G. (2002). A Bibliography of Data Envelopment Analysis (1978–2001) (Rutcor Res. Report, RRR, 01-02).Google Scholar
  35. Vidgen, R., Wood-Harper, T., & Wood, R. (1993). A Soft Systems Approach to Information Systems Quality. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 5, 97–112.Google Scholar
  36. Wilson, B. (1990). Systems: Concepts, Methodologies and Applications. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  37. Winter, M. (2006). Problem Structuring in Project Management: An Application of Soft Systems Methodology (SSM). Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57, 808–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Winter, M. C., & Checkland, P. (2003). Soft Systems: A Fresh Perspective for Project Management. Proceedings of the ICE – Civil Engineering, 156(4), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1680/cien.2003.156.4.187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yeo, K. T. (1993). Systems Thinking and Project Management-Time to Reunite. International Journal of Project Management, 11(1), 111–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Manchester UniversityManchesterUK
  2. 2.Faculty of Business and LawManchester Metropolitan UniversityManchesterUK
  3. 3.Facultad de IngenieríaUniversidad de BelgranoBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations