Advertisement

Theories of Individual Ageing

  • José Luis Iparraguirre
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter briefly looks into the different theories of individual ageing and their relationship with economic activity and circumstances. It draws upon the scholarly output in biological sciences, psychology, and social gerontology. Biological theories seek to provide an answer to why and how and where human beings age. Psychological theories look into effects of ageing on cognitive functions, personality, behaviour, and human development. Social gerontological theories tackle the changes in social roles, expectations, and aspirations as people age.

References

  1. Adams, Jean M., and Martin White. “Biological Ageing: A Fundamental, Biological Link Between Socio-economic Status and Health?” The European Journal of Public Health14, no. 3 (2004): 331–334.Google Scholar
  2. Adler, Nancy E. “Cell Aging and Social Disadvantage: Perspectives on Mechanisms Underlying Health Disparities from “Across the Pond”.” Brain, Behavior and Immunity 25, no. 7 (2011): 1290–1291.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, John S. et al. “Normal Neuroanatomical Variation Due to Age: The Major Lobes and a Parcellation of the Temporal Region.” Neurobiology of Aging 26, no. 9 (2005): 1245–1260.Google Scholar
  4. Alwin, Duane F. et al. “Population Processes and Cognitive Aging.” In Handbook of Cognitive Aging: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Edited by Scott M. Hofer and Duane F. Alwin. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Arking, Robert. The Biology of Aging, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  6. Atchley, Robert C. “A Continuity Theory of Normal Aging.” The Gerontologist 29, no. 2 (1989): 183–190.Google Scholar
  7. Austad, Steven N. “Concepts and Theories of Aging.” In Handbook of the Biology of Aging. Edited by Edward J. Masoro and Steven N. Austad. 5th ed. San Diego, CA: Academic, 2001.Google Scholar
  8. Bandura, A. “Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change.” Psychological Review 84 (1977): 191–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. —. “Self-referent Thought: A Developmental Analysis of Self-efficacy.” In Social Cognitive Development: Frontiers and Possible Futures. Edited by J. H. Flavell and L. Ross. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  10. Banks, James, and Zoe Oldfield. “Understanding Pensions: Cognitive Function, Numerical Ability and Retirement Saving.” Fiscal Studies 28, no. 2 (2007): 143–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Banks, James, Cormac O’Dea, and Zoe Oldfield. “Cognitive Function, Numeracy and Retirement Saving Trajectories.” The Economic Journal 120, no. 548 (2010): F381–F410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baum, Steven K., and Russell L. Boxley. “Age Identification in the Elderly.” The Gerontologist 23, no. 5 (1983): 532–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Behl, Christian, and Christine Ziegler. Cell Aging: Molecular Mechanisms and Implications for Disease, 1st ed. Springer Briefs in Molecular Medicine. New York: Springer, 2014.Google Scholar
  14. Bengtson, Vern L., Elisabeth O. Burgess, and Tonya M. Parrott. “Theory Explanation, and a Third Generation of Theoretical Development in Social Gerontology.” The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 52B, no. 2 (1997): S72–S88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bergmann, Martin S. “Psychoanalysis in Old Age. The Patient and the Analyst.” In Clinical Implications of the Psychoanalyst’s Life Experience: When the Personal Becomes Professional. Relational Perspectives Book Series. Edited by Steven Kuchuck. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis, 2013.Google Scholar
  16. Birren, James E. “Psychological Aspects of Aging: Intellectual Functioning.” The Gerontologist 8, no. 1, Part 2 (1968): 16–19.Google Scholar
  17. Bishop, Nicholas A., Tao Lu, and Bruce A. Yankner. “Neural Mechanisms of Ageing and Cognitive Decline.” Nature 464, no. 7288 (2010), 529–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Blanchard-Fields, Fredda, and Antje Kalinauskas. “Theoretical Perspectives on Social Context, Cognition, and Aging.” In Handbook of Theories of Aging. Edited by Vern L. Bengtson et al. 2nd ed. New York: Springer Publishing Company LLC, 2009.Google Scholar
  19. Bobak, Martin et al. “Socioeconomic Factors, Perceived Control and Self-reported Health in Russia. A Cross-Sectional Survey.” Social Science & Medicine 47, no. 2 (1998): 269–279.Google Scholar
  20. Boonekamp, Jelle J., Michael Briga, and Simon Verhulst. “The Heuristic Value of Redundancy Models of Aging.” Experimental Gerontology 71 (2015): 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Caddy, Ian, Dennis Mortimer, and Kathy Tannous et al. “Linking Long-Term Unemployment and the Theory of Disengagement: A Preliminary Investigation Using Australian Bureau of Statistics Labour Force Data.” Employment Relations Record 10, no. 2 (2010): 1.Google Scholar
  22. Calafell, F., and N. Malats. “Basic Molecular Genetics for Epidemiologists.” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 57, no. 6 (2003): 398–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Campbell, Neil A., and Jane B. Reece. Biology, 7th ed. San Francisco, CA: Pearson Education, 2005.Google Scholar
  24. Carstensen, Laura L. “Social and Emotional Patterns in Adulthood: Support for Socioemotional Selectivity Theory.” Psychology and Aging 7 (1992): 331–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Carstensen, Laura L. “Foreword.” In Handbook of Cognitive Aging: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Edited by Scott M. Hofer and Duane F. Alwin. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc, 2008.Google Scholar
  26. Carstensen, Laura L., D. M. Isaacowitz, and S. T. Charles. “Taking Time Seriously: A Theory of Socioemotional Selectivity Theory.” American Psychologist 54 (1999): 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Carter, Mary Anne Taylor, and Kelli Cook. “Adaptation to Retirement: Role Changes and Psychological Resources.” The Career Development Quarterly 44, no. 1 (1995): 67–82.Google Scholar
  28. Caslake, Robert et al. “Age-, Gender-, and Socioeconomic Status-Specific Incidence of Parkinson’s Disease and Parkinsonism in North East Scotland: The {PINE}Study.” Parkinsonism & Related Disorders 19, no. 5 (2013): 515–521.Google Scholar
  29. Chambré, Susan Maizel. “Is Volunteering a Substitute for Role Loss in Old Age? An Empirical Test of Activity Theory.” The Gerontologist 24, no. 3 (1984): 292–298.Google Scholar
  30. Costa Jr., P. T., and R. R. McCrae. “Trait Psychology Comes of Age.” In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 39. Psychology and Aging. Edited by T. B. Sonderegger. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  31. Council, National Research. When I’m 64. Report by the Committee on Aging Frontiers in Social Psychology Personality and Adult Developmental Psychology. Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, et al., 2006.Google Scholar
  32. Dannefer, Dale. “Cumulative Advantage/Disadvantage and the Life Course: Cross-Fertilizing Age and Social Science Theory.” The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 58, no. 6 (2003): S327–S337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. de Grip, Andries et al. “Job-Worker Mismatch and Cognitive Decline.” Oxford Economic Papers 60, no. 2 (2008): 237–253.Google Scholar
  34. de la Fuente, Mónica. “The Immune System, a Marker and Modulator of the Rate of Aging.” In Immunology of Aging. Edited by Ahmad Massoud and Nima Rezaei. 36–45. Berlin: Springer, 2014.Google Scholar
  35. Eizenman, Dara R. et al. “Intraindividual Variability in Perceived Control in an Older Sample: The MacArthur Successful Aging Studies” Psychology and Aging 12, no. 3 (1997): 489.Google Scholar
  36. Elder, Glen, Monica K. Johnson, and Robert Crosnoe. “The Emergence and Development of Life Course Theory.” In Handbook of the Life Course. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Edited by Jeylan T. Mortimer and Michael J. Shanahan. 3–20. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Science+ Business Media, 2006.Google Scholar
  37. Erber, J. “Aging & Older Adulthood”, 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.Google Scholar
  38. Fjell, Anders M., and Kristine B. Walhovd. “Structural Brain Changes in Aging: Courses, Causes and Cognitive Consequences.” Reviews in the Neurosciences 21, no. 3 (2010): 187–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fuchs, Victor R. “Self-employment and Labor Force Participation of Older Males.” Journal of Human Resources 17, no. 3 (1982): 339–357.Google Scholar
  40. Gawron, Natalia et al. “Cognitive Patterns of Normal Elderly Subjects Are Consistent With Frontal Cortico-Subcortical and Fronto-Parietal Neuropsychological Models of Brain Aging.” Applied Neuropsychology: Adult 21, no. 3 (2014): 195–209.Google Scholar
  41. Gianaros, Peter J. et al. “Prospective Reports of Chronic Life Stress Predict Decreased Grey Matter Volume in the Hippocampus.” Neuroimage 35, no. 2 (2007): 795–803.Google Scholar
  42. Gruenewald, Tara L. et al. “History of Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Allostatic Load in Later Life.” Social Science & Medicine 74, no. 1 (2012): 75–83. Part Special Issue: Sites for Health Rights: Local, National, Regional and Global.Google Scholar
  43. Guessous, Idris et al. “Prevalence of Frailty Indicators and Association with Socioeconomic Status in Middle-aged and Older Adults in a Swiss Region with Universal Health Insurance Coverage: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.” Journal of Aging Research (2014). https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/19860.
  44. Hansen, Åse Marie et al. “Social Gradient in Allostatic Load Among Danish Men and Women in Late Midlife.” Journal of Aging and Health 26, no. 1 (2014): 72–87.Google Scholar
  45. Hayflick, Leonard. “Theories of Biological Aging.” Experimental Gerontology 20 (1985): 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hendricks, J., and S. J. Cutler. “Volunteerism and Socioemotional Selectivity in Later Life.” The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 59 (2004): S251–S257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Herr, Marie et al. “Contribution of Socioeconomic Position Over Life to Frailty Differences in Old Age: Comparison of Life-Course Models in a French Sample of 2350 Old People.” Annals of Epidemiology 25, no. 9 (2015): 674–680.Google Scholar
  48. Hess, Thomas M. et al. “The Impact of Stereotype Threat on Age Differences in Memory Performance.” Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences 58B, no. 1 (2003): P3–P11.Google Scholar
  49. Hirokawa, Katsuiku (2014). “Aging is Something Like an Opera Which can be Constructed by Many Players. Interview by Tamas Fulop.” Biogerontology 15, no. 5, 535–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Holliday, Robin. “Aging: The Reality: The Multiple and Irreversible Causes of Aging.” The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 59, no. 6 (2004): B568–B572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Horvath, Steve. “DNA Methylation Age of Human Tissues and Cell Types.” Genome Biology 14, no. 10 (2013), R115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hou-Shun, Lieu. “The Concept of Economic Homeostasis.” The Analysts Journal 12, no. 4 (1956): 51–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hutter-Saunders, Jessica A. L., Rodney L. Mosley, and Howard E. Gendelman. “Pathways Towards an Effective Immunotherapy for Parkinson’s Disease.” Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 11, no. 12 (2011): 1703–1715.Google Scholar
  54. Hwang, An-Chun et al. “Predicting All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality by Static and Dynamic Measurements of Allostatic Load: A 10-Year Population-Based Cohort Study in Taiwan.” Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 15, no. 7 (2014): 490–496.Google Scholar
  55. Infurna, Frank J., Denis Gerstorf, and Steven H. Zarit. “Examining Dynamic Links Between Perceived Control and Health: Longitudinal Evidence for Differential Effects in Midlife and Old Age” Developmental Psychology 47, no. 1 (2011): 9–18.Google Scholar
  56. Janssen, Ian et al. “The Healthcare Costs of Sarcopenia in the United States.” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 52, no. 1 (2004): 80–85.Google Scholar
  57. Jensen, Arthur R., and S. N. Sinha. “Physical Correlates of Human Intelligence.” In Biological Approaches to the Study of Human Intelligence. Edited by Phillip A. Vernon. 139–242. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing, 1993.Google Scholar
  58. Jin, Kunlin. “Modern Biological Theories of Aging.” Aging and Disease 1, no. 2 (2010): 72–74.Google Scholar
  59. Jorm, Anthony F. et al. “Occupation Type as a Predictor of Cognitive Decline and Dementia in Old Age.” Age and Ageing 27, no. 4 (1998): 477–483.Google Scholar
  60. Kanherkar, Riya Rajan, Naina Bhatia-Dey, and Antonei Benjamin Csoka. “Epigenetics Across the Human Lifespan.” Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 2: 49 (2014).Google Scholar
  61. Karlamangla, Arun S. et al. “Trajectories of Cognitive Function in Late Life in the United States: Demographic and Socioeconomic Predictors.” American Journal of Epidemiology 170, no. 3 (2009): 331–342.Google Scholar
  62. Kim, Seongsu, and Daniel C. Feldman. “Working in Retirement: The Antecedents of Bridge Employment and Its Consequences for Quality of Life in Retirement.” The Academy of Management Journal 43, no. 6 (2000): 1195–1210.Google Scholar
  63. Kirkwood, Thomas B. L. “Systems Biology of Aging and Longevity.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 366 (2011): 64–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kohn, Melvin L., and Carmi Schooler. “The Reciprocal Effects of the Substantive Complexity of Work and Intellectual Flexibility: A Longitudinal Assessment.” American Journal of Sociology 84 (1978): 24–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kriete, Andres, and Mathieu Cloutier. “Developing a Systems Biology of Aging.” In Computational Systems Biology. Edited by Andres Kriete and Roland Eils. 2nd ed., 407–422. Oxford: Academic, 2014.Google Scholar
  66. Krueger, R. F., and W. Johnson. “Behavioral Genetics and Personality a New Look at the Integration of Nature and Nurture.” In Handbook of Personality Theory and Research. Edited by O. P. John, R. W. Robins, and L. A. Pervin. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford, 2008.Google Scholar
  67. Labbadia, John, and Richard I. Morimoto. “Proteostasis and Longevity: When Does Aging Really Begin?” F1000Prime Reports 6 (2014).Google Scholar
  68. Le Bourg, Eric. “Obsolete Ideas and Logical Confusions Can Be Obstacles for Biogerontology Research.” Biogerontology 14, no. 2 (2013): 221–227.Google Scholar
  69. Leist, Anja K., Philipp Hessel, and Mauricio Avendano. “Do Economic Recessions During Early and Mid-adulthood Influence Cognitive Function in Older Age?” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2013-202843.
  70. Li, Ye et al. “Complementary Cognitive Capabilities, Economic Decision Making, and Aging.” Psychology and Aging 28, no. 3 (2013): 595–613.Google Scholar
  71. Lipowicz, Anna, Alicja Szklarska, and Robert M. Malina. “Allostatic Load and Socioeconomic Status in Polish Adult Men.” Journal of Biosocial Science 46, no. 02 (2014): 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Lix, Lisa M. et al. “Socioeconomic Variations in the Prevalence and Incidence of Parkinson’s Disease: A Population-Based Analysis.” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 64, no. 4 (2010): 335–340.Google Scholar
  73. Lopez-Otin, Carlos et al. “The Hallmarks of Aging.” Cell 156 (2013): 1194–1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Malats, N., and F. Calafell. “Basic Glossary on Genetic Epidemiology.” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 57, no. 7 (2003): 480–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Mani, Anandi et al. “Poverty Impedes Cognitive Function.” Science 341, no. 6149 (2013): 976–980.Google Scholar
  76. Marmot, Michael G. et al. “Employment Grade and Coronary Heart Disease in British Civil Servants.” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 32, no. 4 (1978): 244–249.Google Scholar
  77. Marmot, Michael G. et al. “Health Inequalities Among British Civil Servants: The Whitehall II Study.” The Lancet 337, no. 8754 (1991): 1387–1393.Google Scholar
  78. Marquié, Jean-Claude et al. “Chronic Effects of Shift Work on Cognition: Findings from the VISAT Longitudinal Study.” Occupational and Environmental Medicine (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2013-101993.
  79. McKean Skaff, Marilyn. “Sense of Control and Health. A Dynamic Duo in the Aging Process.” In Handbook of Health Psychology and Aging. Edited by Carolyn M. Aldwin, Crystal L. Park, and Avron Spiro III. New York: The Guilford Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  80. Merton, Robert K. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York, NY: Free Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  81. Mitnitski, Arnold, and Kenneth Rockwood. “Aging as a Process of Deficit Accumulation: Its Utility and Origin.” In Aging and Health-A Systems Biology Perspective. Vol. 40, 85–98. Basel: Karger Publishers, 2014.Google Scholar
  82. —-. “The Rate of Aging: The Rate of Deficit Accumulation Does Not Change Over the Adult Life Span.” Biogerontology 17, no. 1 (2016): 199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Mitnitski, Arnold B., Alexander J. Mogilner, and Kenneth Rockwood. “Accumulation of Deficits as a Proxy Measure of Aging.” The Scientific World Journal 1 (2001): 323–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Mitnitski, Arnold, Xiaowei Song, and Kenneth Rockwood. “Assessing Biological Aging: The Origin of Deficit Accumulation.” Biogerontology 14, no. 6 (2013): 709–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Morimoto, Richard I., and Ana Maria Cuervo. “Proteostasis and the Aging Proteome in Health and Disease.” The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 69, Suppl. 1 (2014): S33–S38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Murray, Alison D. et al. “Early Life Socioeconomic Circumstance and Late Life Brain Hyperintensities A Population Based Cohort Study.” PloS One 9, no. 2 (2014): e88969. https://doi.org/101371/journal.pone.0088969.
  87. Nahemow, Lucille, and M. Powell Lawton. “Toward an Ecological Theory of Adaptation and Aging.” Environmental Design Research 1 (1973): 24–32.Google Scholar
  88. Neugarten, Bernice L., R. J. Havighurst, and S. S. Tobin. “Personality and Patterns of Aging.” In Middle Age and Aging. Edited by Bernice L. Neugarten. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  89. Nicod, Edouard et al. “Association of Education and Receiving Social Transfers with Allostatic Load in the Swiss Population-Based CoLaus Study.” Preventive Medicine 63 (2014): 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Park, Denise, and Meredith Minear. “Cognitive Aging: New Directions for Old Theories.” In New Frontiers in Cognitive Aging. Edited by Roger A. Dixon, Lars Bäckman, and Lars Göran-Nilsson, 19–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Pearlin, Leonard I., and Mark F. Pioli. “Personal Control: Some Conceptual Turf and Future Directions.” In Personal Control in Social and Life Course Contexts. (Societal Impact on Aging). Edited by Steven H. Zarit, K. Warner Schaie, and Leonard I. Pearlin. Vol. 22. New York: Springer Publishing Company LLC, 2003.Google Scholar
  92. Peng, Cheng et al. “Biology of Ageing and Role of Dietary Antioxidants.” In BioMed Research International ID 831841 (2014): 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/831841.
  93. Peysselon, Franck, and Sylvie Ricard-Blum. “Understanding the Biology of Aging with Interaction Networks.” Maturitas 69, no. 2 (2011): 126–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Picard, Martin. “Pathways to Aging: The Mitochondrion at the Intersection of Biological and Psychosocial Sciences.” Journal of Aging Research ID 814096 (2011): 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/814096.
  95. Politser, Peter. Neuroeconomics : A Guide to the New Science of Making Choices: A Guide to the New Science of Making Choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Potter, G. G. et al. “Occupational Characteristics and Cognitive Performance Among Elderly Male Twins.” Neurology 67, no. 8 (2006): 1377–1382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Potter, Guy G., Michael J. Helms, and Brenda L. Plassman. “Associations of Job Demands and Intelligence with Cognitive Performance Among Men in Late Life.” Neurology 70, no. 19, Part 2 (2008): 1803–1808.Google Scholar
  98. Rattan, Suresh. “Theories of Biological Aging: Genes, Proteins, and Free Radicals.” Free Radicals Research 40, no. 12 (2006), 1230–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Read, Sanna, and Emily Grundy. “Allostatic Load and Health in the Older Population of England: A Crossed-Lagged Analysis.” Psychosomatic Medicine 76, no. 7 (2014): 490–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Richer, George. Sociological Theory, 8th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2011.Google Scholar
  101. Riley, M. W., M. E. Johnson, and A. Foner. A Sociology of Age Stratification. Aging and Society, vol. 3. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1972.Google Scholar
  102. Roberts, B. W., K. E. Walton, and W. Viechtbauer. “Patterns of Mean-Level Change in Personality Traits Across the Life Course: A Meta-analysis of Longitudinal Studies.” Psychological Bulletin 132 (2006): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Robertson, Tony Frank Popham, and Michaela Benzeval. “Socioeconomic Position Across the Lifecourse & Allostatic Load: Data from the West of Scotland Twenty-07 Cohort Study.” BMC Public Health 14, no. 1 (2014): 184.Google Scholar
  104. Rockwood, Kenneth, and Arnold Mitnitski. “Frailty in Relation to the Accumulation of Deficits.” The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 62, no. 7 (2007): 722–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Rockwood, Kenneth, Michael R. H. Rockwood, and Arnold Mitnitski. “Physiological Redundancy in Older Adults in Relation to the Change with Age in the Slope of a Frailty Index.” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 58, no. 2 (2010): 318–323.Google Scholar
  106. Rodin, Judith, Christine Timko, and Susan Harris. “The Construct of Control: Biological and Psychosocial Correlates.” Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics. Edited by Carl Eisdorfer M. Powell Lawton and George L. Maddox. Vol. 5. New York: Springer Publishing Company LLC, 1985.Google Scholar
  107. Rotter, J. B. “Generalized Expectancies for Internal Versus External Control of Reinforcement.” Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 80 (1966): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Sacher, George A. “Theory in Gerontology.” In Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Volume 1: Biological, Clinical, Behavioral, Social Issues. Edited by Carl Eisdorfer. 3–25. New York, NY: Springer, 1980.Google Scholar
  109. Sahin, Ergun, and Ronald A. DePinho. “Axis of Ageing: Telomeres, p53 and Mitochondria.” Nature Reviews—Molecular Cell Biology 13 (2012): 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Salthouse, Timothy A. Major Issues in Cognitive Aging. Oxford Psychology Series no. 49. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
  111. —-. “Neuroanatomical Substrates of Age-Related Cognitive Decline.” Psychological Bulletin 137, no. 5 (2011): 753.Google Scholar
  112. Salthouse, Timothy A. et al. “Age and Experience Effects in Spatial Visualization.” Developmental Psychology 26, no. 1 (1990): 128.Google Scholar
  113. Satariano, William, and Marlon Maus. Aging Place and Health. A Global Perspective. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2017.Google Scholar
  114. Schoneich, Christian. “Proteomics in Aging Research.” In Handbook of Models for Human Aging. Edited by P. Michael Conn. 99–108. Burlington, MA: Elsevier, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Schroots, Johannes J. F. “Theoretical Developments in the Psychology of Aging.” The Gerontologist 36, no. 6 (1996): 742–748.Google Scholar
  116. Searle, Samuel D. et al. “A Standard Procedure for Creating a Frailty Index.” BMC Geriatrics 8, no. 24 (2008): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-8-24.
  117. Seeman, Teresa et al. “Socio-economic Differentials in Peripheral Biology: Cumulative Allostatic Load.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1186 (2010): 223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Seeman, Melvin et al. “Social Status and Biological Dysregulation: The ‘Status Syndrome’ and Allostatic Load.” Social Science & Medicine 118 (2014): 143–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Shah, Sonia et al. “Genetic and Environmental Exposures Constrain Epigenetic Drift Over the Human Life Course.” Genome Research 24, no. 11 (2014): 1725–1733.Google Scholar
  120. Sherman, Elaine, Leon G. Schiffman, and Anil Mathur. “The Influence of Gender on the New-Age Elderly’s Consumption Orientation.” Psychology & Marketing 18, no. 10 (2001): 1073–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Sigelman, Carol K., and Elizabeth A. Rider. Life-Span Human Development, 7th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2012.Google Scholar
  122. Smart, Emily Alan Gow, and Ian J. Deary. “Occupational Complexity and Lifetime Cognitive Abilities.” Neurology (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000001075.
  123. Soler-Vila, Hosanna et al. “Contribution of Health Behaviours and Clinical Factors to Socioeconomic Differences in Frailty Among Older Adults.” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 70, no. 4 (2016): 354–360.Google Scholar
  124. Stern, Y. et al. “Influence of Education and Occupation on the Incidence of Alzheimer’s Disease.” JAMA 271, no. 13 (1994): 1004–1010.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1994.03510370056032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Street, D. “Sociological Approaches to Understanding Age and Aging.” In Handbook of Gerontology : Evidence-Based Approaches to Theory Practice and Policy. Edited by Catherine N. Dulmus and A. Blackburn. 143–168. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2007.Google Scholar
  126. Strulik, Holger et al. (2012). Long-Run Economic Perspectives of an Ageing Society. Institut für Demographie, Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
  127. Stuart-Hamilton, Ian. The Psychology of Ageing: An Introduction. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2006.Google Scholar
  128. Taylor, Rebecca C., and Andrew Dillin. “Aging as an Event of Proteostasis Collapse.” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 3, no. 5 (2011): a004440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Teschendorff, Andrew E., James West, and Stephan Beck. “Age-Associated Epigenetic Drift: Implications, and a Case of Epigenetic Thrift?” Human Molecular Genetics 22, no. R1 (2013): R7–R15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Theou, Olga et al. “Exploring the Relationship Between National Economic Indicators and Relative Fitness and Frailty in Middle-Aged and Older Europeans.” Age and Ageing 42, no. 5 (2013), 614–619.Google Scholar
  131. Tiessen, Axel, Paulino Perez-Rodriguez, and Luis J. Delaye-Arredondo. “Mathematical Modeling and Comparison of Protein Size Distribution in Different Plant, Animal, Fungal and Microbial Species Reveals a Negative Correlation between Protein Size and Protein Number, thus Providing Insight into the Evolution of Proteomes.” BMC Research Notes 5, no. 1 (2012).Google Scholar
  132. Timiras, Paola S., and Omer Gersten. “The Adrenals and Pituitary-Stress, Adaptation, and Longevity.” In Physiological Basis of Aging and Geriatrics. Edited by Paola S. Timiras. 37–157. New York, NY: Informa Healthcare USA, Inc, 2007.Google Scholar
  133. Tobin, Sheldon S. “A Non-normative Old Age Contrast: Elderly Parents Caring for Offspring with Mental Retardation.” In Adulthood and Aging: Research on Continuities and Discontinuities. A Tribute to Bernice Neugarten. Edited by Vern L. Bengtson. New York: Springer Publishing Company LLC, 1996.Google Scholar
  134. Trinidade, Lucas S. et al. “A Novel Classification System for Evolutionary Aging Theories.” Frontiers in Genetics 4 (2013): 1–8.Google Scholar
  135. Trougakos, Ioannis P. et al. “Non-enzymatic Post-translational Protein Modifications and Proteostasis Network Deregulation in Carcinogenesis.” Journal of Proteomics 92. Special Issue: Posttranslational Protein Modifications in Biology and Medicine (2013): 274–298.Google Scholar
  136. Turrell, Gavin et al. “Socioeconomic Position Across the Lifecourse and Cognitive Function in Late Middle Age.” The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 57, no. 1 (2002), S43–S51.Google Scholar
  137. Victor, Christina R. The Social Context of Ageing A Textbook of Gerontology. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
  138. Vincent, John. Geronticide Killing the Elderly. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2001.Google Scholar
  139. Virtanen, Marianna et al. “Long Working Hours and Cognitive Function: The Whitehall II Study.” American Journal of Epidemiology 169, no. 5 (2009): 596–605.Google Scholar
  140. Weierich, Mariann R. et al. “Older and Wiser? An Affective Science Perspective on Age-related Challenges in Financial Decision Making.” Scan 6 (2011): 195–206.Google Scholar
  141. Weinert, B., and P. Timiras. “Invited Review: Theories of Aging.” Journal of Applied Physiology 95 (2003): 1706–1716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Wesolosky, Jason D., and Christopher J. Rudnisky. “Relationship Between Cataract Severity and Socioeconomic Status.” Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology/Journal Canadien d’Ophtalmologie 48, no. 6 (2013): 471–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Yates, F. Eugene. “Intelligence.” In Encyclopedia of Gerontology. Edited by Martin Lövdén and Ulman Lindenberger. 2nd ed., 763–770. New York, NY: Elsevier, 2007a.Google Scholar
  144. —-. “Theories of Aging: Biological.” In Encyclopedia of Gerontology. Edited by James E. Birren. 2nd ed., 601–610. New York, NY: Elsevier (2007b).Google Scholar
  145. Zarit, Steven H. “Continuities and Discontinuities in Very Late Life.” In Adulthood and Aging: Research on Continuities and Discontinuities. A Tribute to Bernice Neugarten. Edited by Vern L. Bengtson. New York: Springer Publishing Company LLC, 1996.Google Scholar
  146. Zhang, Zhenmei, Danan Gu, and Mark D. Hayward. “Early Life Influences on Cognitive Impairment Among Oldest Old Chinese.” The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 63, no. 1 (2008): S25–S33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Zykovich, Artem et al. “Genome-wide DNA Methylation Changes with Age in Disease-free Human Skeletal Muscle.” Aging Cell 13, no. 2 (2014), 360–366.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • José Luis Iparraguirre
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of MorónBuenos AiresArgentina
  2. 2.Age UKLondonUK

Personalised recommendations