Advertisement

Age, Period, Cohort, and Generational Effects

  • José Luis Iparraguirre
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter introduces four basic concepts in applied social science: age, period, cohort, and generation. It also describes the attempts at disentangling the effects of each one in empirical work.

References

  1. Abrams, P. Historical Sociology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  2. Alwin, D., S. Hofer, and R. McCammon. “Modeling the Effects of Time. Integrating Demographic and Developmental Perspectives.” In Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences. Edited by Robert H. Binstock and Linda K. George. 6th ed., 20–38. Burlington: Elsevier, 2006.Google Scholar
  3. Amyot, Jean-Jacques. À la recherche de lies entre les générations. Rennes: Presses de L’EHESP, 2016.Google Scholar
  4. Attanasio, Orazio P. “Cohort Analysis of Saving Behavior by U.S. Households.” The Journal of Human Resources 33, no. 3 (1998): 575–609.Google Scholar
  5. Barro, Robert J. “Are Government Bonds Net Wealth?” Journal of Political Economy 82, no. 6 (1974): 1095–1117.Google Scholar
  6. Becton, John Bret, Harvell Jack Walker, and Allison Jones-Farmer. “Generational Differences in Workplace Behavior.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 44, no. 3 (2014): 175–189.Google Scholar
  7. Beeman, Richard. Q & A with Richard Beeman. 13 October 2011. http://www.upenn.edu/pennnews/current/2011-10-13/interviews/qarichard-beeman.
  8. Bell, Andrew, and Kelvyn Jones. “Another ‘Futile Quest’? A Simulation Study of Yang and Land’s Hierarchical Age-Period-Cohort Model.” Demographic Research 30, no. 11 (2014): 333–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bengtson, Vern L. Longitudinal Study of Generations, 1971, 1985, 1988, 1991, 1994, 1997, 2000 [California], Version ICPSR22100-v2. Ann Harbor: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research, 2009. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22100.v2.
  10. Bernheim, B. Douglas, and Kyle Bagwell. “Is Everything Neutral?” Journal of Political Economy 96, no. 2 (1988): 308–338.Google Scholar
  11. Biagi, Federico, and Claudio Lucifora. “Demographic and Education Effects on Unemployment in Europe.” Labour Economics 15, no. 5 (2008): 1076–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bierens, Herman J., and Norman R. Swanson. “The Econometric Consequences of the Ceteris Paribus Condition in Economic Theory.” Journal of Econometrics 95, no. 2 (2000): 223–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Biggs, Simon. “Thinking About Generations: Conceptual Positions and Policy Implications.” Journal of Social Issues 63, no. 4 (2007): 695–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Biörn, Erik et al. “The Rise in Absenteeism: Disentangling the Impacts of Cohort, Age and Time.” Journal of Population Economics 26, no. 4 (2013): 1585–1608.Google Scholar
  15. Boumans, Marcel, and Mary S. Morgan. “Ceteris Paribus Conditions: Materiality and the Application of Economic Theories.” Journal of Economic Methodology 8, no. 1 (2001): 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Browning, Martin, Ian Crawford, and Marike Knoef. The Age-Period Cohort Problem: Set Identification and Point Identification. CeMMAP working papers CWP02/12. Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies, 2012.Google Scholar
  17. Brunello, Giorgio. “The Effects of Cohort Size on European Earnings.” Journal of Population Economics 23, no. 1 (2010): 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Buchanan, James M. “Ceteris Paribus: Some Notes on Methodology.” Southern Economic Journal 24 (1958): 259–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Byham, W.C. 70 the New 50: Retirement Management Retaining the Energy and Expertise of Experienced Employees. Bridgeville: Development Dimensions International, 2006.Google Scholar
  20. Cawley, John, James Heckman, and Edward Vytlacil. Understanding the Role of Cognitive Ability in Accounting for the Recent Rise in the Economic Return to Education. NBER Working Paper 6388. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1998Google Scholar
  21. Chen, Renbao, Kie Ann Wong, and Hong Chew Lee. “Age, Period, and Cohort Effects on Life Insurance Purchases in the US.” Journal of Risk and Insurance 68, no. 2 (2001): 303–327.Google Scholar
  22. Deaton, Angus, and Christina Paxson. “Saving, Growth, and Aging in Taiwan.” In Studies in the Economics of Aging. 331–362. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  23. Doepke, Matthias, Moshe Hazan, and Yishay D. Maoz. “The Baby Boom and World War II: A Macroeconomic Analysis.” The Review of Economic Studies 82, no. 3 (2015): 1031–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Donohue III, John J., and Steven D. Levitt. “The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (2001): 379–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Earman, John, and John Roberts. “Ceteris Paribus, There Is No Problem of Provisos.” Synthese 118, no. 3 (1999): 439–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Earman, John, Clark Glymour, and Sandra Mitchell. Ceterus Paribus Laws. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.Google Scholar
  27. Easterlin, Richard A. “What Will 1984 Be Like? Socioeconomic Implications of Recent Twists in Age Structure.” Demography 15, no. 4 (1978): 397–432.Google Scholar
  28. Euwals, Rob, Marike Knoef, and Daniel Van Vuuren. “The Trend in Female Labour Force Participation: What Can Be Expected for the Future?” Empirical Economics 40, no. 3 (2011): 729–753.Google Scholar
  29. Fu, Wenjiang J.“Ridge Estimator in Singular Design with Application to Age-Period-Cohort Analysis of Disease Rates.” Communications in Statistics Theory and Methods 29, no. 2 (2000): 263–278.Google Scholar
  30. ———. “A Smoothing Cohort Model in Age-Period-Cohort Analysis with Applications to Homicide Arrest Rates and Lung Cancer Mortality Rates.” Sociological Methods & Research 36, no. 3 (2008): 327–361.Google Scholar
  31. Glenn, N. D. Cohort Analysis. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 1977.Google Scholar
  32. Heberle, R. Social Movements: An Introduction to Political Sociology. Appleton-Century-Crofts Sociology Series. Vol. 3. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1951.Google Scholar
  33. Heckman, James, and Richard Robb. “Using Longitudinal Data to Estimate Age, Period and Cohort Effects in Earnings Equations.” In Cohort Analysis in Social Research, 137–150. Berlin: Springer, 1985.Google Scholar
  34. Held, Carsten. “Ceteris-Paribus Qualifiers.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 48, no. 3 (2017): 439–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hendrik, Jürges. “Age, Cohort, and the Slump in Job Satisfaction Among West German Workers.” Labour 17, no. 4 (2003): 489–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Heuer, Carsten. “Modeling of Time Trends and Interactions in Vital Rates Using Restricted Regression Splines.” Biometrics 53, no. 1 (1997): 161–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Howe, N., and W. Strauss. Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation. Vintage Original. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, 2009.Google Scholar
  38. Hsu, Hui-Chuan, Chin-Yin Lew-Ting, and Shwu-Chong Wu. “Age, Period, and Cohort Effects on the Attitude Toward Supporting Parents in Taiwan.” The Gerontologist 41, no. 6 (2001): 742–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. Censos y conteos de población y vivienda. serie histórica censal e intercensal, 2014.Google Scholar
  40. Kapteyn, Arie, Rob J. M. Alessie, and Annamaria Lusardi. “Explaining the Wealth Holdings of Different Cohorts: Productivity Growth and Social Security.” European Economic Review 49, no. 5 (2005): 1361–1391.Google Scholar
  41. Kearl, J. R., and Clayne L. Pope. “The Life Cycle in Economic History.” The Journal of Economic History 43, no. 1 (1983): 149–158.Google Scholar
  42. Keyes, Katherine M. et al. “Age, Period, and Cohort Effects in Psychological Distress in the United States and Canada.” American Journal of Epidemiology 179, no. 10 (2014): 1216–1227.Google Scholar
  43. Kim, Young Wook, Paul Fidgeon, and Jin Kim. “Analyzing the Leisure Activities of the Baby Boomers and the Generation of Liberation: Evidence from South Korea.” Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change 13 (2014): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766825.2014.Google Scholar
  44. Kupper Lawrence L. et al. “Statistical Age-Period-Cohort Analysis: A Review and Critique.” Journal of Chronic Diseases 38, no. 10 (1985): 811–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lippmann, Stephen. “Rethinking Risk in the New Economy: Age and Cohort Effects on Unemployment and Re-employment.” Human Relations 61, no. 9 (2008): 1259–1292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mannheim, Karl. The Problem of Generations, 276–322. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd., 1952.Google Scholar
  47. Mason, Karen Oppenheim et al. “Some Methodological Issues in Cohort Analysis of Archival Data.” American Sociological Review 38, no. 2 (1973): 242–258.Google Scholar
  48. Maurin, Eric, and Sandra McNally. “Vive la Révolution! Long-Term Educational Returns of 1968 to the Angry Students.” Journal of Labor Economics 26 (2008): 1–33.Google Scholar
  49. McKay Stephen. “Poverty or Preference: What Do ‘Consensual Deprivation Indicators’ Really Mean?” Fiscal Studies 25, no. 2 (2004): 201–223.Google Scholar
  50. Mills, C. W., and T. Gitlin. The Sociological Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  51. Morgan, Leslie, and Suzanne Kunkel. Aging Society and the Life Course. New York: Springer, 2007.Google Scholar
  52. Nakamura, Takashi. “Bayesian Cohort Models for General Cohort Table Analyses.” Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 38, no. 1 (1986): 353–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Palmore, Erdman. “When Can Age, Period, and Cohort be Separated?” Social Forces 57, no. 1 (1978): 282–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Parry, E. Generational Diversity at Work: New Research Perspectives. Didcot: Taylor & Francis, 2014.Google Scholar
  55. Parry, Emma, and Peter Urwin. “Generational Differences in Work Values: A Review of Theory and Evidence.” International Journal of Management Reviews 13, no. 1 (2011): 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pavalko, Eliza K., Fang Gong, and J. Scott Long. “Women’s Work, Cohort Change, and Health.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 48, no. 4 (2007): 352–368.Google Scholar
  57. Persky, Joseph. “Retrospectives: Ceteris Paribus.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 4, no. 2 (1990): 187–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Phillips, J., K. Ajrouch, and S. Hillcoat-Nallétamby. Key Concepts in Social Gerontology. 1st ed. London: SAGE, 2010.Google Scholar
  59. Pietroski, Paul, and Georges Rey. “When Other Things Aren’t Equal: Saving Ceteris Paribus Laws from Vacuity.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46, no. 1 (1995): 81–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pullum, Thomas W. “Separating Age, Period, and Cohort Effects in White US Fertility, 1920–1970.” Social Science Research 9, no. 3 (1980): 225–244.Google Scholar
  61. Rentz, Joseph O., and Fred D. Reynolds. “Separating Age, Cohort and Period Effects in Consumer Behavior.” Advances in Consumer Research 8, no.1 (1981): 596–601.Google Scholar
  62. Robertson, Chris, Sara Gandini, and Peter Boyle. “Age-Period-Cohort Models: A Comparative Study of Available Methodologies.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 52, no. 6 (1999): 569–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rodgers, Willard L. “Estimable Functions of Age, Period, and Cohort Effects.” American Sociological Review 47 (1982): 774–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rosenberg, Ed., and Irene L. Letrero “Using Age, Cohort, and Period to Study Elderly Volunteerism.” Educational Gerontology 32, no. 5 (2006): 313–334.Google Scholar
  65. Roth, Duncan, and John Moffat. The Cohort Size-Wage Relationship in Europe. ERSA Conference Papers ersa13p950. Louvain-la-Neuve: European Regional Science Association, 2013.Google Scholar
  66. Ryder, N. B. “The Cohort as a Concept in the Study of Social Change.” American Sociological Review 30 (1965): 843–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Samuelson, Paul A. “An Exact Consumption-Loan Model of Interest with or Without the Social Contrivance of Money.” The Journal of Political Economy 66, no. 6 (1958): 467–482.Google Scholar
  68. Schewe, Charles D., and Geoffrey Meredith. “Segmenting Global Markets by Generational Cohorts: Determining Motivations by Age.” Journal of Consumer Behaviour 4, no. 1 (2004): 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schmid, Volker J., and Leonhard Held. “Bayesian Age-Period-Cohort Modeling and Prediction - BAMP.” Journal of Statistical Software 21, no. 8 (2007): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schrenk, Markus A. The Metaphysics of Ceteris Paribus Laws. Heusenstamm: Ontos Verlag, 2007.Google Scholar
  71. Segall, Erica. “Three Dimensions of Time: An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis of U.S. Spending Patterns.” The Yale Journal of Economics 2, no. 1 (2013): 59–86.Google Scholar
  72. Slack, Tim, and Leif Jensen. “Birth and Fortune Revisited: A Cohort Analysis of Underemployment, 1974–2004.” Population Research and Policy Review 27, no. 6 (2008): 729–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Strauss, William, and Neil Howe. Generations: The History of America’s Future 1584 to 2069. New York: Quill, 1991.Google Scholar
  74. Suitor, J. Jill et al. “Intergenerational Relations in Later-Life Families.” In Handbook of Sociology of Aging, 161–178. Berlin: Springer, 2011.Google Scholar
  75. Sutin, Angelina R. et al. “The Effect of Birth Cohort on Well-Being: The Legacy of Economic Hard Times.” Psychological Science 24, no. 3 (2013): 379–385.Google Scholar
  76. Tu, Yu-Kang, George Davey Smith, and Mark S. Gilthorpe. “A New Approach to Age-Period-Cohort Analysis Using Partial Least Squares Regression: The Trend in Blood Pressure in The Glasgow Alumni Cohort.” PloS One 6, no. 4 (2011): e19401.Google Scholar
  77. Twigg, Julia, and Shinobu Majima. “Consumption and the Constitution of Age: Expenditure Patterns on Clothing, Hair and Cosmetics Among Post-War ‘Baby Boomers’.” Journal of Aging Studies 30 (2014): 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Unterhuber, Matthias. “Do Ceteris Paribus Laws Exist? A Regularity-Based Best System Analysis.” Erkenntnis 79, no. 10 (2014): 1833–1847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Weil, Philippe. “Overlapping Generations: The First Jubilee.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 22, no. 4 (2008): 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Welch, Finis. “Effects of Cohort Size on Earnings: The Baby Boom Babies’ Financial Bust.” The Journal of Political Economy 87 (1979): S65–S97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wright, Robert E. “Cohort Size and Earnings in Great Britain.” Journal of Population Economics 4, no. 4 (1991): 295–305.Google Scholar
  82. Yang, Yang. “Social Inequalities in Happiness in the United States, 1972 to 2004: An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis.” American Sociological Review 73, no. 2 (2008a): 204–226.Google Scholar
  83. ———. “Trends in US Adult Chronic Disease Mortality 1960–1999: Age, Period, and Cohort Variations.” Demography 45, no. 2 (2008b): 387–416.Google Scholar
  84. Yang, Yang, Wenjiang J. Fu, and Kenneth C. Land. “A Methodological Comparison of Age-Period-Cohort Models: The Intrinsic Estimator and Conventional Generalized Linear Models.” Sociological Methodology 34, no. 1 (2004): 75–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Yang, Yang et al. “The Intrinsic Estimator for Age-Period-Cohort Analysis: What It Is and How to Use It.” American Journal of Sociology 113, no. 6 (2008): 1697–1736.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • José Luis Iparraguirre
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of MorónBuenos AiresArgentina
  2. 2.Age UKLondonUK

Personalised recommendations