Advertisement

Economic Perspective

  • Ana Pires
  • Graça Martinho
  • Susana Rodrigues
  • Maria Isabel Gomes
Chapter

Abstract

In a sustainable waste collection and management system, the economic component is traditionally an imperative factor for the decisions and justifications of all operations. The calculation of the cost and revenue components associated with waste collection systems must be taken into account and analyzed from an integrated waste management perspective. Additionally, the willingness and the affordability of citizens to finance the waste collection and management system are also vital to the success of any collection and management system. In this chapter presented and discussed are the waste collection costs, the financial concerns of waste management systems and instruments of waste policy, and the public and private sector financing.

Keywords

Benchmarking Cost functions Financing Fuel consumption PAYT Public-private partnership Recycling Solid waste 

References

  1. Abdelli I, Abdelmalek F, Djelloul A, Mesghouni K, Addou A (2016) GIS-based approach for optimised collection of household waste in Mostaganem city (Western Algeria). Waste Manag Res 34:417–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adamsen C, Blagoeva T, Ilisescu AR, Le Den X, Nielsen SS (2016) Legal assistance on the application of public procurement rules in the waste sector – final report. Publications Office of the European Union, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  3. Allesch A, Brunner PH (2014) Assessment methods for solid waste management: a literature review. Waste Manag Res 32:461–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arribas C, Blazquez C, Lamas A (2010) Urban solid waste collection system using mathematical modelling and tools of geographic information systems. Waste Manag Res 28:355–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Assis R (2011) Depreciation methods (in Portuguese: Métodos de amortização). http://www.rassis.com/artigos/Economia/Metodos%20de%20Amortizacao.pdf. Accessed 10 Sep 2015
  6. Bel G, Miralles A (2003) Factors influencing the privatisation of urban solid waste collection in Spain. Urban Stud 40:1323–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bilitewski B, Härdtle G, Maek K, Weissbach A, Boeddicker H (1994) Waste management. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  8. Bilitewski B, Werner P, Reichenbach J (2004) Handbook on the implementation of Pay-As-You-Throw as a tool for urban waste management. Eigenverlag des Forum für Abfallwirtschaft und Altlasten e. V., DresdenGoogle Scholar
  9. Bohm R, Folz D, Kinnaman T, Podolsky M (2010) The costs of municipal curbside recycling and waste collection. Resour Conserv Recycl 54:864–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bolaane B, Isaac E (2015) Privatization of solid waste collection services: lessons from Gaborone. Waste Manag 40:14–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bosch N, Pedraja F, Suárez-Pandiello J (2001) The efficiency of refuse collection services in Spanish municipalities: do non-controllable variables matter? Institut d'Economia de Barcelona, Centre de Recerca en Federalisme fiscal I Economia regional, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  12. Boskovic G, Jovicic N, Jovanovic S, Simovic V (2016) Calculating the costs of waste collection: a methodological proposal. Waste Manag Res 34:775–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bouhamed A, Chaabouni J (2008) Partenariat public-privé en Tunisie: Les conditions de succès et d’échec. Int J Technol Manag Sustain Dev 7:71–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Callan S, Thomas J (2001) Economies of scale and scope: a cost analysis of municipal solid waste services. Land Econ 77:548–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carvalho JM (2011) Annex 5: municipal solid waste management costs (in Portuguese: Anexo 5: Custos de sistema de gestão de resíduos urbanos). www.ua.pt/ReadObject.aspx?obj=18467. Accessed 23 Sep 2015
  16. Chang NB, Pires A (2015) Sustainable solid waste management: a systems engineering approach. IEEE Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  17. Chowdhury M (2009) Searching quality data for municipal solid waste planning. Waste Manag 29:2240–2247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (2004) Smart (Pay-as-You-Throw) implementation handbook. http://www.ct.gov/deep/lib/deep/reduce_reuse_recycle/payt/ct_dep_smart_implementation_handbook_parts_1_thru_4.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2018
  19. D’Onza G, Greco G, Allegrini A (2016) Full cost accounting in the analysis of separated waste collection efficiency: a methodological proposal. J Environ Manag 167:59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dahlén L, Lagerkvist A (2010) Pay as you throw: strengths and weaknesses of weight-based billing in household waste collection systems in Sweden. Waste Manag 30:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dahlén L, Åberg H, Lagerkvist A, Berg PE (2009) Inconsistent pathways of household waste. Waste Manag 29:1798–1806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Delloite (2004) Model of calculation of counterpart amount (in Portuguese: Modelo de cálculo do valor de contrapartida - versão final). Instituto dos Resíduos, LisboaGoogle Scholar
  23. Dijkgraaf E, Gradus RHJM (2004) Cost savings in unit-based pricing of household waste: the case of The Netherlands. Resour Energy Econ 26:353–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dogan K, Süleyman S (2003) Report: cost and financing of municipal solid waste collection services in Istanbul. Waste Manag Res 21:480–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dubin J, Navarro P (1988) How markets for impure public goods organize the case of households refuse collection. J Law Econ Organ 4:217–241Google Scholar
  26. Entidade Reguladora dos Serviços de Águas e Resíduos (ERSAR) (2014) Tariff regulation for municipla solid .waste management service (in Portuguese: Regulamento tarifário do serviço de gestão de resíduos urbanos). http://www.ersar.pt/. Accessed 3 Jun 2015
  27. European Commission (2015) Guide to cost-benefit analysis of investment projects – economic appraisal tool for Cohesion Policy 2014–2020. Publications Office of the European Union, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  28. Faccio MP (2011) Waste collection multi objective model with real time traceability data. Waste Manag 31(12):2391–2405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Folz DH (1999) Recycling policy and performance: trends in participation, diversion, and costs. Public Work Manag Policy 4:131–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gamberini R, Galloni L, Rimini B, Beltrami FO (2009) Evaluation and comparison of waste collection services. In: Abstracts of the twelfth international waste management and landfill symposium, Sardinia, 9–11 Oct 2009Google Scholar
  31. Gamberini R, Del Buono D, Lolli F, Rimini B (2013) Municipal solid waste management: identification and analysis of engineering indexes representing demand and costs generated in virtuous Italian communities. Waste Manag 33:2532–2540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. García-Sánchez MI (2008) The performance of Spanish solid waste collection. Waste Manag Res 26:327–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ghose MD (2006) A GIS based transport model for solid waste disposal – a case study on Asansol municipality. Waste Manag 26:1278–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Girth AM, Hefetz A, Johnston JM, Warner ME (2012) Outsourcing public service delivery: management responses in noncompetitive markets. Public Admin Rev 72:887–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. GIZ GmbH (2015) Economic instruments in solid waste management: applying economic instruments for sustainable solid waste management in low and middle-income countries. https://www.giz.de/en/downloads/giz2015-en-waste-management-economic-instruments.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2018
  36. Gomes AP (2008) Separate collection of the biodegradable fraction of MSW: an economic assessment. Waste Manag 28:1711–1719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. González-Torre, P. L., Adenso-Díaza, B., Ruiz-Torres, R. (2003). Some comparative factors regarding recycling collection systems in regions of the USA and Europe. Journal of Environmental Management, 69 (2), 129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Goulart A (2003) Comparison of deep collection system with traditional system. Dissertation, Tampere University of Technology (TUT)Google Scholar
  39. Greaver F (1999) Strategic outsourcing – a structured approach of outsourcing decisions and iniatives. AMACOM, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Greco G, Allegrini M, Del Lungo C, Savellini PG, Gabellini L (2015) Drivers of solid waste collection costs Empirical evidence from Italy. J Clean Prod 106:364–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hage OS (2008) An econometric analysis of regional differences in household waste collection: the case of plastic packaging waste in Sweden. Waste Manag 28:1720–1731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hogg D (2002) Costs for municipal waste management in the EU: final report to directorate general environment, European Commission. Eunomia Research & Consulting, Ltd, on behalf of Ecotec-Research & ConsultingGoogle Scholar
  43. Hoornweg D, Bhada-Tata P (2012) What a waste: a global review of solid waste management. Urban development series knowledge papers, nr. 15. Urban Development & Local Government Unit, World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  44. Huang Y, Pan T, Kao J (2011) Performance assessment for municipal solid waste collection in Taiwan. J Environ Manag 92:1277–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jacobsen R, Buysse J, Gellynck X (2013) Cost comparison between private and public collection of residual household waste: multiple case studies in the Flemish region of Belgium. Waste Manag 33:3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Johansson O (2006) The effect of dynamic scheduling and routing in a solid waste management system. Waste Manag 26:875–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kakabadse A, Kakabadse N (2005) Outsourcing: current and future trends. Thunderbird Int Bus Rev 47:183–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Karadimas N, Papatzelou K, Loumos V (2007) Optimal solid waste collection routes identified by the ant colony system algorithm. Waste Manag Res 25:139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kinyua BK (2015) Determinants of outsourcing services as a cost reduction measure in devolve government: a case study of Narobi city country, Kenya. Eur J Bus Soc Sci 4:12–23Google Scholar
  50. Kling M, Seyring N, Tzanova P (2016) Assessment of economic instruments for countries with low municipal waste management performance: an approach based on the analytic hierarchy process. Waste Manag Res 34:912–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Komilis DP (2008) Conceptual modeling to optimize the haul and transfer. Waste Manag 28:2355–2365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Larsen A, Vrgoc M, Christensen T, Lieberknecht P (2009) Diesel consumption in waste collection and transport and its environmental significance. Waste Manag Res 27:652–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Larsen A, Merrild H, Moller J, Christensen T (2010) Waste collection systems for recyclables: an environmental and economic assessment for the municipality of Aarhus (Denmark). Waste Manag 30:744–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lavita, M (2008) Multi-material door-to-door collection routes (in Portuguese: Circuitos de recolha selectiva multi-material porta-a-porta). Dissertation, IST/UTL – Instituto Superior Técnico, LisbonGoogle Scholar
  55. Levy J (2004) National paradigm and 3R policy (reverse logistics) (in Portuguese: Panorama 999 nacional e a polÚtica dos 3R (logÚstica inversa)). In: Abstracts from the Recursos, resÚduos e 1000 reciclagem, IST, Lisbon, 25 Oct 2004Google Scholar
  56. Levy J, Oliveira R, Brito J (2007) Reverse logistics (in Portuguese: A logística inversa). http://seminarios.ist.utl.pt/03-04/des/IST-seminario/sprod/3sessao. Accessed Dec 26 2013
  57. López JV, Soriano F, Aguilar M, León B, Ramos-Catalina P, Carretero C (2007) MetodologÚa de Contenerización para residuos de envases ligeros: caso de Aranjuez. E.T.S.I. de Montes. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Dpto. IngenierÚa Forestal. Madrid: Universidad Politécnica de MadridGoogle Scholar
  58. Massouda M, El-Fadelb M, Malak AA (2003) Assessment of public vs private MSW management: a case study. J Environ Manag 69:15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McLeod F, Cherrett T (2011) Waste collection. In: Letcher TM, Vallero DA (eds) Waste: a handbook for management. Elsevier, Burlington, pp 61–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Miller L, Delbridge P (1995) Waste management in Hampshire feedback on the strategy, December 1995. Miller Associates and PDA InternationalGoogle Scholar
  61. Nguyen TTT, Wilson GB (2010) Fuel consumption estimation for kerbside municipal solid waste (MSW) collection activities. Waste Manag Res 28:289–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. O’Leary P, Walsh P (1995) Decision maker’s guide to solid waste management, 2nd edn. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste, RCRA Information Center, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  63. Ohlsson H (2003) Ownership and production costs: choosing between public production and contracting-out in the case of Swedish refuse collection. Fisc Stud 24:451–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2018) Extended producer responsibility. http://www.oecd.org/env/tools-evaluation/extendedproducerresponsibilityhtm. Accessed 4 May 2018
  65. Padovani E, Young DW (2008) Toward a framework for managing high-risk government outsourcing: field research in three Italian municipalities. J Public Procure 8:215–247Google Scholar
  66. Pearce D, Brisson I (1995) The economics of waste management. In: Hester RE, Harrison RM (eds) Waste treatment and disposal. The Royal Society of Chemistry, LondonGoogle Scholar
  67. Perman R, Common M, McGilvray J, Ma Y (2003) Natural resource and environmental economics, 3rd edn. Pearson Education, HarlowGoogle Scholar
  68. Post J (2004) Evolving partnerships in the collection of urban solid waste in the developing world. In: Isa B, Post J, Furedy C (eds) Solid waste management and recycling: actors, partnerships and policies in Hyderabad, India. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rada E, Ragazzi M, Fedrizzi P (2013) Web-GIS oriented systems viability for municipal solid waste selective collection optimization in developed and transient economies. Waste Manag 33:785–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rathje WL, Murphy C (1992) Rubbish! The archaeology of garbage. Harper Collins Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  71. Reichenbach J (2008) Status and prospects of pay-as-you-throw in Europe – a review of pilot research and implementation studies. Waste Manag 28:2809–2814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rhoma FZ (2010) Environmental & economical optimization for municipal solid waste collection problems, a modeling and algorithmic approach case study. In: WSEAS international conference on mathematical methods, computational techniques and intelligent systems, Sousse, Tunisia, May 3–6, 2010, pp 205–211Google Scholar
  73. Ricci M (2003) Economic assessment of separate collection cost: tools to optimize it and the advantage of operative integration. In: Abstracts from the future of source separation of organic waste in Europe. Barcelona, Spain, 15–16 Dec 2003Google Scholar
  74. Rizzoli A, Montemanni R, Lucibello E, Gambardella L (2007) Ant colony optimization for realworld vehicle routing problems – from theory to applications. Swarm Intell 1:135–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rodrigues S (2016) Classification and benchmarking of urban waste collection systems (in portuguese: Classificação e benchmarking de sistemas de recolha de resíduos urbanos). Dissertation, NOVA University of LisbonGoogle Scholar
  76. Rodrigues S, Martinho G, Pires A (2016a) Waste collection systems part A: a taxonomy. J Clean Prod 113:374–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rodrigues S, Martinho G, Pires A (2016b) Waste collection systems part B: benchmarking. J Clean Prod 139:230–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rogge N, De Jaeger S (2012) Evaluating the efficiency of municipalities in collecting and processing. Waste Manag 32:1968–1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sanjeevi V, Shahabudeen P (2016) Optimal routing for efficient municipal solid waste transportation by using ArcGIS application in Chennai, India. Waste Manag Res 34:11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Santos RF, Santana F, Antunes P, Martinho MG, Jordão L, Sirgado P, Neves AG (1994) Municipal solid waste management system of Lisbon – Cost analysis (in Portuguese: Sistema de resíduos sólidos do município de Lisboa – Análise da estrutura de custos do sistema de resíduos sólidos). Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, NOVA University of LisbonGoogle Scholar
  81. Shekdar A, Mistry P (2001) Evaluation of multifarious solid waste management systems – a goal programming approach. Waste Manag Res 19:391–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sonesson U (2000) Modelling of waste collection – a general approach to calculate fuel consumption and time. Waste Manag Res 18:115–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sora M, González J (2014) Economic balance of door-to-door and road containers waste collection for local authorities and proposals for its optimization. Commissioned by the Association of Catalan Municipalities for Door-to-Door Selective collection to Fundació ENTGoogle Scholar
  84. Stevens B (1978) Scale, market structure, and the cost of refuse collection services: the case of Ireland. Econ Soc Rev 31:129–150Google Scholar
  85. SusValueWaste (2017) Private or .public waste management? http://www.susvaluewaste.no/2017/10/12/private-or-public-waste-management/. Accessed 4 May 2018
  86. Tchobanoglous G, Theisen H, Vigil S (1993) Integrated solid waste management engineering: principles and management issues. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  87. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1997) Full cost accounting for municipal solid waste management: a handbook. United States Environmental Protection, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  88. van Dijk MP, Schouten M (2004) The dynamics of the European water supply and sanitation market. In: Abstracts from AWRA international specialty conference 2004, University of Dundee, 29 Aug – 2 Sept 2004Google Scholar
  89. Vidal RG (2001) Integrated analysis for pre-sorting and waste collection schemes implemented in Spanish cities. Waste Manag Res 19:380–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Watkins E, Hogg D, Mitsios A, Mudgal S, Neubauer S, Reisinger H, Troeltzsch J, Van Acoleyen M (2012) Use of economic instruments and waste management performances – final report. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/pdf/final_report_10042012.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2018

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana Pires
    • 1
  • Graça Martinho
    • 1
  • Susana Rodrigues
    • 1
  • Maria Isabel Gomes
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Sciences and TechnologyUniversidade NOVA de Lisboa (FCT NOVA)CaparicaPortugal

Personalised recommendations