Advertisement

Psychosocial Perspective

  • Ana Pires
  • Graça Martinho
  • Susana Rodrigues
  • Maria Isabel Gomes
Chapter

Abstract

Strategies have been applied to encourage recycling behavior, which is the most participative component of the integrated waste management, where the citizens are the key to ensure the success of a separate waste collection system. A short review of the most studied variables and factors involved in the study of consumption and recycling behavior is made in this chapter. At the end of the chapter are presented several limitations of existing recycling behavior models which need to be solved and which criteria should be used to measure the efficacy and efficiency of interventions used to change behavior. The urgent need to understand the recycling phenomena is notorious to address the environmental problem of waste and to increase recycling, promoting the circular economy.

Keywords

Recycling behavior Household waste Motivation Contextual factors Sociodemographic variables Convenience factors 

References

  1. Abrahamse W, Steg L (2009) How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relate to households’ direct and indirect energy use and savings? J Econ Psychol 30:711–720Google Scholar
  2. Ajzen I (1985) From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behaviour. In: Kuhl J, Beckmann J (eds) Action-control: from cognition to behaviour. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 11–39Google Scholar
  3. Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behaviour. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211Google Scholar
  4. Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  5. Ajzen I, Madden TJ (1986) Prediction of goal-directed behavior: attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. J Exp Soc Psychol 22:453–474Google Scholar
  6. Andrews KH, Kandel DB (1979) Attitude and behavior: a specification of the contingent consistency hypothesis. Am Sociol Rev 44:298–310Google Scholar
  7. Bagozzi RP, Yi Y, Baumgartner J (1990) The level of effort required for behavior as a moderator of an attitude-behavior relation. Eur J Soc Psychol 20:45–59Google Scholar
  8. Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84:191–215Google Scholar
  9. Bandura A (1982) Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Am Psychol 37:122–147Google Scholar
  10. Barr D (2007) Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviors: a UK case study of household waste management. Environ Behav 39:435–473Google Scholar
  11. Barr S, Ford NJ, Gilg AW (2003) Attitudes towards recycling household waste in Exeter, Devon: quantitative and qualitative approaches. Local Environ 8:407–421Google Scholar
  12. Beale DA, Manstead ASR (1991) Predicting mothers’ intentions to limit frequency of infants’ sugar intake: testing the theory of planned behaviour. J Appl Soc Psychol 21:409–431Google Scholar
  13. Becker N (2014) Increasing high recycling rates socio-demographics as an additional layer of information to improve waste management. Dissertation, University of LundGoogle Scholar
  14. Bentler PM, Speckhart G (1979) Models of attitude-behavior relations. Psychol Rev 86:452–464Google Scholar
  15. Berger I (1997) The demographics of recycling and the structure of environmental behaviour. Environ Behav 29:515–531Google Scholar
  16. Bilitewski B (2008) From traditional to modern fee systems. Waste Manag 28:2760–2766Google Scholar
  17. Bloom PN, Novelli WD (1981) Problems and challenges in social marketing. J Mark 45:79–88Google Scholar
  18. Boyd B, Wandersman A (1991) Predicting undergraduate condom use with the Fishbein and Ajzen and the Triandis attitude-behavior models: implications for public health interventions. J Appl Soc Psychol 21:1810–1830Google Scholar
  19. Chaisamrej R (2006) The integration of the theory of planned behavior, altruism, and self-construal: implications for designing recycling campaigns in individualistic and collectivistic societies. Dissertation, University of KentuckyGoogle Scholar
  20. Cialdini RB, Petty RE, Cacioppo JT (1981) Attitude and attitude change. Annu Rev Psychol 32:357–404Google Scholar
  21. Cooper J, Croyle R (1984) Attitude and attitude change. Annu Rev Psychol 35:395–426Google Scholar
  22. Davies J, Foxall GR, Pallister J (2002) Beyond the intention-behavior mythology: an integrated model of recycling. Mark Theory 2:29–113Google Scholar
  23. Dawes RM (1980) Social dilemmas. Annu Rev Psychol 31:169–193Google Scholar
  24. De Feo G, De Gisi S (2010) Domestic separation and collection of municipal solid waste: opinion and awareness of citizens and worker. Sustainability 2:1297–1326Google Scholar
  25. De Young R (1993) Changing behavior and making it stick: the conceptualization and management of conservation behaviour. Environ Behav 25:485–505Google Scholar
  26. De Young R, Duncan A, Frank J, Gill N, Rothman S, Shenot J, Shotkin A, Zweizig M (1993) Promoting source reduction behavior: the role of motivational information. Environ Behav 25:70–85Google Scholar
  27. Domina T, Koch K (2002) Convenience and frequency of recycling: implications for including textiles in curbside recycling programs. Environ Behav 34:216–238Google Scholar
  28. Dwyer W, Leeming F, Cobern M, Porter B, Jackson J (1993) Critical review of behavior interventions to preserve the environment: research science 1980. Environ Behav 25:275–321Google Scholar
  29. Eagly AH, Chaiken S (1993) The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  30. Echabe AE, Rovira DP, Garate JF (1988) Testing Ajzen and Fishbein’s attitudes model: the prediction of voting. Eur J Soc Psychol 18:181–189Google Scholar
  31. Egmond RB, Bruel R (2007) Nothing is as practical as a good theory: analysis of theories and a tool for developing interventions to influence energy-related behaviour. http://www.cres.gr/behave/pdf/paper_final_draft_CE1309.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 2017
  32. European Environmental Bureau (EEB) (2005) EU environmental policy handbook – a critical analysis of EU environmental legislation. EEB, BruxelsGoogle Scholar
  33. Farley JU, Lehmann DR, Ryan MJ (1981) Generalizing from “imperfect” replication. J Bus 54:597–610Google Scholar
  34. Fazio RH, Zanna MP (1981) Direct experience and attitude behavior consistency. In: Berkowitz L (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  36. Fishbein M, Stasson M (1990) The role of desires, self-predictions, and perceived control in the prediction of training session attendance. J Appl Soc Psychol 20:173–198Google Scholar
  37. Foa UG (1971) Interpersonal and economic resources. Science 171:345–351Google Scholar
  38. Gallardo A, Bovea MD, Colomer FJ, Prades M (2012) Analysis of collection systems for sorted household waste in Spain. Waste Manag 32:1623–1633Google Scholar
  39. Gardner GT, Stern PC (1996) Environmental problems and human behaviour. Allyn & Bacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  40. Geller ES (1989) Applied behavior analysis and social marketing: an integration to preserve the environment. J Soc Issues 45:17–36Google Scholar
  41. Gifford R (2014) Environmental psychology: principles and practice, 5th edn. Optimal Books, ColvilleGoogle Scholar
  42. Grube JW, Morgan M, McGree ST (1986) Attitudes and normative beliefs as predictors of smoking intentions and behaviors: a test of three models. Br J Soc Psychol 25:81–93Google Scholar
  43. Hage O, Söderholm P (2008) An econometric analysis of regional differences in household waste collection: the case of plastic packaging waste in Sweden. Waste Manag 28:1720–1731Google Scholar
  44. Hage O, Söderholm P, Ch B (2008) Norms and economic motivation in household recycling: evidence from Sweden. Resour Conserv Recycl 53:155–165Google Scholar
  45. Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248Google Scholar
  46. Henriksson G, Åkesson L, Ewert S (2010) Uncertainty regarding waste handling in everyday life. Sustainability 2:2799–2813Google Scholar
  47. Hopper JR, Nielsen JN (1991) Recycling as altruistic behaviour: normative and behavioral strategies to expand participation in a community recycling program. Environ Behav 23:195–220Google Scholar
  48. Hornik J, Cherian J, Madansky M, Narayana C (1995) Determinants of recycling behavior: a synthesis of research results. J Socio Econ 24:105–127Google Scholar
  49. Howenstine E (1993) Market segmentation for recycling. Environ Behav 25:86–102Google Scholar
  50. Jesson JK (2009) Household waste recycling behavior: a market segmentation model. Soc Mark Q 15:25–38Google Scholar
  51. John P, Cotterill S, Richardson L, Moseley A, Stoker G, Wales C, Smith G (2013) Nudge, nudge, think, think: experimenting with ways to change civic behavior. Bloomsbury Academic Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  52. Katzev RD, Pardini AU (1987–88) The comparative effectiveness of reward and commitment approaches in motivating community recycling. J Environ Syst 17:93–111Google Scholar
  53. Kedia P (2016) Big data analytics for efficient waste management. Int J Res Eng Technol 5:208–211Google Scholar
  54. Knussen C, Yule F (2008) “I’m not in the habit of recycling” the role of habitual behavior in the disposal of household waste. Environ Behav 40:683–702Google Scholar
  55. Kotler P, Zaltman G (1971) Social marketing: an approach to planned social change. J Mark 35:3–12Google Scholar
  56. Lansana FM (1993) A comparative analysis of curbside recycling behavior in urban and suburban communities. Prof Geogr 45:169–179Google Scholar
  57. Lima ML, Batel S (2011) Psychosocial study of predictors of recycling behaviors in different waste disposal systems (in Portuguese: Estudo psicossocial dos preditores de comportamentos de reciclagem em distintos sistemas de deposição de resíduos). ISCTE-IUL, LisbonGoogle Scholar
  58. Lima ML, Branco C (2016) Implementation, evaluation and validation of social indicators predictors of participation associated with the recycling of urban waste (in Portuguese: Implementação, avaliação e validação de indicadores sociais preditores da participação associados à reciclagem de resíduos urbanos (Relatório 1: indicadores sociais de gestão de resíduos). CIS-IUL/ISCTE-IUL, LisbonGoogle Scholar
  59. Lindsay J, Strathman A (1997) Predictors of recycling behavior: an application of a modified health belief model. J Appl Soc Psychol 27:1799–1823Google Scholar
  60. Liska AE (1984) A critical examination of the causal structure of the Fishbein/Ajzen attitude-behavior model. Soc Psychol Q 47:61–74Google Scholar
  61. Luyben PD, Cummings S (1981–82) Motivating beverage container recycling on a college campus. J Environ Syst 11:235–245Google Scholar
  62. Margai FL (1997) Analyzing changes in waste reduction behavior in a low-income urban community following a public outreach program. Environ Behav 29:769–792Google Scholar
  63. Martinho G (1998) Determining factors for recycling behaviors. Case study: glass system (in Portuguese: Factores determinantes para os comportamentos de reciclagem caso de estudo: sistema de vidrões). Dissertation, NOVA University of LisbonGoogle Scholar
  64. Martinho MG (2009) Recycling psychology. An eco-different (in Portuguese: Psicologia da reciclagem. Um eco.diferente) honorable mention at communicating environment prize by Calouste Gulbenkian FoundationGoogle Scholar
  65. Martinho G, Pires A, Portela G, Fonseca M (2015) Factors affecting consumers’ choices concerning sustainable packaging during product purchase and recycling. Resour Conserv Recycl 103:58–68Google Scholar
  66. Martinho G, Magalhães D, Pires A (2017a) Consumer behavior with respect to the consumption and recycling of smartphones and tablets: an exploratory study in Portugal. J Clean Prod 156:147–158Google Scholar
  67. Martinho G, Balaia N, Pires A (2017b) The Portuguese plastic carrier bag tax: the effects on consumers’ behavior. Waste Manag 61:3–12Google Scholar
  68. McAndrew FT (1993) Environmental psychology. Wadsworth, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  69. McCaul KD, Koop JT (1982) Effects of goal setting and commitment on increasing metal recycling. J Appl Psychol 67:377–379Google Scholar
  70. McClelland L, Canter R (1981) Psychological research on energy conservation: context, approaches, method. In: Baum A, Singer J (eds) Advances in environmental psychology: energy conservation, psychological perspectives, vol 3. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 1–25Google Scholar
  71. McDonald S, Ball R (1998) Public participation in plastics recycling schemes. Resour Conserv Recycl 22:123–141Google Scholar
  72. Medvedev A, Fedchenkov P, Zaslavsky A, Anagnostopoulos T, Khoruzhnikov S (2015) Waste management as an IoT-enabled service in smart cities. In: Balandin S, Andreev S, Koucheryavy Y (eds) Internet of things, smart spaces, and next generation networks and systems. ruSMART 2015. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 9247. Springer, Cham, pp 104–115Google Scholar
  73. Meneses GD, Palacio AB (2005) Recycling behavior: a multidi-mensional approach. Environ Behav 37:837–860Google Scholar
  74. Miafodzyeva S, Brandt N (2013) Recycling behavior among households: synthesizing determinants via a meta-analysis. Waste Biomass Valorization 4:221–235Google Scholar
  75. Miafodzyeva S, Brandt N, Anderson M (2013) Recycling behavior of householders living in multicultural urban area: a case study of Järva, Stockholm, Sweden. Waste Manag Res 31:447–457Google Scholar
  76. Morlok J, Schoenberger H, Styles D, Galvez-Martos J-L, Zeschmar-Lahl B (2017) The impact of Pay-As-You-Throw schemes on municipal solid waste management: the exemplar case of the county of Aschaffenburg, Germany. Resources 6:8Google Scholar
  77. Needleman LD, Geller ES (1992) Comparing interventions to motivate work-site collection of home-generated recyclables. Am J Community Psychol 20:775–787Google Scholar
  78. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OCDE) (2006) Impacts of unit-based waste collection charges. http://www1.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=ENV/EPOC/WGWPR(2005)10/FINAL&docLanguage=En. Accessed 3 May 2018
  79. Oskamp S, Harrington M, Edwards T, Sherwood D, Okuda S, Swanson D (1991) Factors influencing household recycling behaviour. Environ Behav 23:494–519Google Scholar
  80. Oskamp S, Williams R, Unipan J, Steers N, Mainieri T, Kurland G (1994) Psychological factors affecting paper recycling by businesses. Environ Behav 26:477–503Google Scholar
  81. Owens J, Dickerson S, Macintosh DL (2002) Demographic covariates of residential recycling efficiency. Environ Behav 32:637–650Google Scholar
  82. Perchard E (2017) Smart streets: how the internet of things is revolutionising waste. Resource sharing knowledge to promote waste as a resource. https://resource.co/article/smart-streets-how-internet-things-revolutionising-waste-11721. Accessed 10 Mar 2017
  83. Pires A, Martinho G, Chang NB (2011) Solid waste management in European countries: a review of systems analysis techniques. J Environ Manag 92:1033–1050Google Scholar
  84. Porter BE, Leeming FC, Dwyer WO (1995) Solid waste recovery: a review of behavioral programs to increase recycling. Environ Behav 27:122–152Google Scholar
  85. Reichenbach J (2008) Status and prospects of pay-as-you-throw in Europe—a review of pilot research and implementation studies. Waste Manag 28:2809–2814Google Scholar
  86. Rodrigues S, Martinho G, Pires A (2016) Waste collection systems part B: benchmarking indicators. Benchmarking of the Great Lisbon Area, Portugal. J Clean Prod 139:230–241Google Scholar
  87. Rogoff MJ, Williams JF (1994) Approaches to implementing solid waste recycling facilities. Noyes Publications, Park RidgesGoogle Scholar
  88. Rousta K, Bolton K, Danhén L (2016) A procedure to transform recycling behavior for source separation of household waste. Recycling 1:147–165Google Scholar
  89. Saphores JD, Nixon H, Ogunseitan O, Shapiro A (2006) Household willingness to recycle electronic waste: an application to California. Environ Behav 38:183–208Google Scholar
  90. Schlegel RP, DiTecco D (1982) Attitudinal structures and the attitude-behavior relation. In: Zanna MP, Higgins ET, Herman CP (eds) Consistency in social behavior: the Ontario symposium, vol 2. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 283–301Google Scholar
  91. Schmuck P, Vlek C (2003) Psychologists can do much to support sustainable development. Eur Psychol 8:66–76Google Scholar
  92. Schultz PW, Oskamp S, Mainieri T (1995) Who recycles and when? A review of personal and situational factors. J Environ Psychol 15:105–121Google Scholar
  93. Schwartz SH (1970) Moral decision making and behavior. In: Macauley M, Berkowitz L (eds) Altruism and helping behavior. Academic Press, New York, pp 127–141Google Scholar
  94. Schwartz SH (1977) Normative influences on altruism. In: Berkowitz L (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 10. Academic Press, New York, pp 221–279Google Scholar
  95. Söderholm P (2011) Environmental policy and household behavior: sustainability and everyday life London. Earthscan, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  96. Springer T, Haver R (1994) Preventing waste at the source: educating the public. Resour Recycl 13:95–100Google Scholar
  97. Stern PC (2000) Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J Soc Issues 56:65–84Google Scholar
  98. Stern PC, Oskamp S (1987) Managing scarce environmental resources. In: Stokols D, Altman I (eds) Handbook of environmental psychology, vol 2. Wiley, New York, pp 1043–1088Google Scholar
  99. Tonglet M, Phillips P, Bates M (2004) Determining the drivers for householder pro-environmental behavior: waste minimization compared to recycling. Resour Conserv Recycl 42:27–48Google Scholar
  100. Vallerand RJ, Pelletier LG, Blais MR, Brière NM, Senècal C, Vallières EF (1992) The academic motivation scale: a measure of intrinsic, extrinsic and amotivation in education. Educ Psychol Meas 52:1003–1017Google Scholar
  101. Vencatasawmy CP, Ohman M, Brannstrom TA (2000) A survey of recycling behavior in households in Kiruna, Sweden. Waste Manag 18:545–556Google Scholar
  102. Vining J, Ebreo A (1990) What makes a recycler? A comparison of recyclers and nonrecyclers. Environ Behav 22:55–73Google Scholar
  103. Vining J, Ebreo A (1992) Predicting recycling behavior from global and specific environmental attitudes and changes in recycling opportunities. J Appl Soc Psychol 22:1580–1607Google Scholar
  104. Vining J, Linn N, Burdge R (1992) Why recycle? A comparison of recycling motivations in four communities. Environ Manag 16:785–797Google Scholar
  105. Vitor F, Martinho MG (2009) Factors influencing households’ participation in organic waste separation. In: Proceedings of the ISWA 2009 World Congress, Lisbon, 12–15 Oct 2009Google Scholar
  106. Vlek C (1996) Collective risk generation and risk management the unexploited potential of the social dilemas paradigm. In: Liebrand WBG, Messick DM (eds) Frontiers in social dilemmas research. Springer, Berlin, pp 11–38Google Scholar
  107. Vlek C, Steg L (2002) The commons dilemma as a practical model for research and policy making about environmental risks. In G. Bartels & W. Nelissen (Eds.), Marketing for sustainability. Towards transactional policy-making (pp. 205–303). Amsterdam, Berlin, Oxford: IOS PressGoogle Scholar
  108. Waite R (1995) Household waste recycling. Earthscan Publications Ldt, LondonGoogle Scholar
  109. Watts A, Fuszek R, Arndt M (1994) In the multi-family way: testing collection strategies and examining costs. Resour Recycl 13:51–56Google Scholar
  110. Webb T, Sheeran P, Luszczynska A (2009) Planning to break unwanted habits: habit strength moderates implementation intention effects on behavior change. Br J Soc Psychol 48:507–523Google Scholar
  111. Zanna MP, Higgins ET, Herman CP (1982) Consistency in social behaviour. Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana Pires
    • 1
  • Graça Martinho
    • 1
  • Susana Rodrigues
    • 1
  • Maria Isabel Gomes
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Sciences and TechnologyUniversidade NOVA de Lisboa (FCT NOVA)CaparicaPortugal

Personalised recommendations