Advertisement

Future Perspectives

  • Ana Pires
  • Graça Martinho
  • Susana Rodrigues
  • Maria Isabel Gomes
Chapter

Abstract

The ultimate challenge that solid waste management needs to comply in the future is the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The adoption of the agenda by the United Nations in 2016 intends to transform the way how the world has evolved. Seventeen goals decomposed in 169 targets are listed to ensure a better world for all, with poverty alleviation, human well-being, and environmental protection in new and more integrated ways (Dermatas, Waste Manag Res 35: 453–455, 2017; UN, Sustainable development goals – 17 goals to transform our world. United Nations. Available via http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/, 2016). Discussing the way how solid waste management can contribute to improving sustainable development and how solid waste management can be shaped to answer to this call was the intention of this section.

Keywords

Consumption Economic growth Environmental impacts Production Recycling Resource use SDGs SWM 

References

  1. Bonatti V (2018) Taking out the garbage: Migrant women’s unseen environmental work. Eur J Women’s Stud 25:41–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chang NB, Pires A (2015) Sustainable solid waste management: a systems engineering approach. IEEE book series on systems science and engineering. Wiley/IEEE, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Cierjacks A, Behr F, Kowarik I (2012) Operational performance indicators for litter management at festivals in semi-natural landscapes. Ecol Indic 13:328–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dermatas D (2017) Waste management and research and the sustainable development goals: focus on soil and groundwater pollution. Waste Manag Res 35:453–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. European Commission (2014a) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the regions towards a circular economy: a zero waste programme for Europe COM/2014/0398 final. European Commission. Available via http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/GA/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52014DC0398. Accessed 15 Jan 2018
  6. European Commission (2014b) Commission Staff working document impact assessment - Accompanying the document Proposal for a Directive of the European parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2008/98/EC on waste, 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste, 1999/31/EC on the landfill of waste, 2000/53/EC on end-of-life vehicles, 2006/66/EC on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators, and 2012/19/EU on waste electrical and electronic equipment. European Commission. Available via http://register.consilium.europa.eu/doc/srv?l=EN&f=ST%2011598%202014%20ADD%203. Accessed 15 Jan 2018
  7. European Commission (2001) Employment effects of waste management policies. European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  8. GESAMP (2016) Sources, fate and effects of microplastics in the marine environment: part two of a global assessment. In: Kershaw PJ, Rochman CM (eds.) IMO/FAO/UNESCO-IOC/UNIDO/WMO/IAEA/UN/UNEP/UNDP joint group of experts on the scientific aspects of marine environmental protection. Rep Stud GESAMP 93, p 220Google Scholar
  9. Gregson N, Crang M, Botticello J, Calestani M, Krzywoszynska A (2016) Doing the ‘dirty work’ of the green economy: resource recovery and migrant labour in the EU. Eur Urban Reg Stud 23:541–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Martinho G, Gomes A, Ramos M, Santos P, Gonçalves G, Fonseca M, Pires A (2018) Solid waste prevention and management at green festivals: a case study of the Andanças Festival, Portugal. Waste Manag 71:10–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rodić L, Wilson DC (2017) Resolving governance issues to achieve priority: sustainable development goals related to solid waste management in developing countries. Sustain 9:404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sabine CL, Feely RA, Gruber N, Key RM, Lee K, Bullister JL, Wanninkhof R, Wong CS, Wallace DWR, Tilbrook B, Millero FJ, Peng TH, Kozyr A, Ono T, Rios AF (2004) The oceanic sink for anthropogenic CO2. Science 305:367–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sheavly SB, Register KM (2007) Marine debris & plastics: environmental concerns, sources, impacts and solutions. J Polym Environ 15:301–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. United Nations (UN) (2016) Sustainable development goals – 17 goals to transform our world. United Nations. Available via http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/. Accessed 20 Feb 2018
  15. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2016) Marine plastic debris and microplastics — Global lessons and research to inspire action and guide policy change. United Nations Environment Programme, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  16. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (2011) Honolulu Strategy. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Available via https://marinedebris.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/publications-files/Honolulu_Strategy.pdf Accessed 20 Feb 2018

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana Pires
    • 1
  • Graça Martinho
    • 1
  • Susana Rodrigues
    • 1
  • Maria Isabel Gomes
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Sciences and TechnologyUniversidade NOVA de Lisboa (FCT NOVA)CaparicaPortugal

Personalised recommendations