Advertisement

Trend Analysis on Sustainable Waste Collection

  • Ana Pires
  • Graça Martinho
  • Susana Rodrigues
  • Maria Isabel Gomes
Chapter

Abstract

To make waste collection desirable, waste collection paradigm needs to change in such way that could promote waste hierarchy and circular economy. Reverse logistics, crowd logistics, physical Internet, and Freight on Transit are innovative solutions applied to waste, sub-products, and end-of-life products capable of bringing the change to the waste collection sector and promote sustainable waste collection behind the frontiers of the system itself.

Keywords

Crowd logistics Freight on transit IoT Physical Internet Reverse logistics Waste collection Waste transportation 

References

  1. Abdulrahman MD, Gunasekaran A, Subramanian N (2014) Critical barriers in implementing reverse logistics in the Chinese manufacturing sectors. Int J Prod Econ 147:460–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arvidsson N (2010) New perspectives on sustainable urban freight distribution: a potential zero emissions concept using electric cars on trams. In: Abstracts of the 12th world conference on transport research, Lisbon, 11–15 June 2010Google Scholar
  3. Ayvaz B, Görener A (2015) Reverse logistics in the electronics waste industry. In: Akkucuk U (ed) Handbook of research on waste management techniques for sustainability. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 155–171Google Scholar
  4. Ballot E, Montreuil B, Meller R (2014) The physical internet: the network of logistics networks. La Documentation, ParisGoogle Scholar
  5. Biggi D, Tretola G (2015) Addressing urban congestion with modular logistics and collaborative networks. In: Abstracts of the URban freight and BEhavior change (URBE) conference, Roma Tre University, Rome, 1–2 Oct 2015Google Scholar
  6. den Boer E, Kok R, van Amstel WP, Quak H, Wagter H (2017) Outlook City Logistics 2017. Report for Topsector LogistiekGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen C, Pan S, Wang Z, Zhong RY (2017) Using taxis to collect citywide E-commerce reverse flows: a crowdsourcing solution. Int J Prod Res 55:1833–1844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Choi TM, Li Y, Xu L (2013) Channel leadership, performance and coordination in closed loop supply chains. Int J Prod Econ 146:371–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chopra S, Meindl P (2010) Supply chain management: strategy, planning and operation, 4th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  10. CityLab (2017a) ICT platform for direct and reverse logistics integration. CityLab http://www.citylab-project.eu/presentations/171020_Rome/Meware.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2017
  11. CityLab (2017b) Living lab updates. CityLab http://www.citylab-project.eu/documents/Living_labs_300917.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2017
  12. Cochrane K, Saxe S, Roorda MJ, Shalaby A (2017) Moving freight on public transit: best practices, challenges, and opportunities. Int J Sustain Transp 11:120–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Couto MCL, Lange LC (2017) Análise dos sistemas de logística reversa no Brasil. Eng Sanit Ambiental.  https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-41522017149403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eltis (2015) Cargo-Tram and E-Tram bulky and electric waste collection by tram in Zurich (Switzerland). Eltis. http://www.eltis.org/discover/case-studies/cargo-tram-and-e-tram-bulky-and-electric-waste-collection-tram-zurich. Accessed 28 Dec 2017
  15. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (EMF) (2016) Waste not, Want not – Capturing the value of the circular economy through reverse logistics: An introduction to the reverser logistics maturity modelGoogle Scholar
  16. Fleischmann M (2000) Quantitative models for reverse logistics. Dissertation, Erasmus UniversityGoogle Scholar
  17. Govindan K, Soleimani H (2017) A review of reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chains: a journal of cleaner production focus. J Clean Prod 142:371–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guide VDR, van Wassenhove LN (2009) OR Forum – the evolution of closed-loop supply chain research. Oper Res 57:10–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Howe J (2006) The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired. https://www.wired.com/2006/06/crowds/. Accessed 28 Dec 2017
  20. INTERREG IVC (2011) Cargotram, Zurich. INTERREG. http://www.interreg4c.eu/good-practices/practice-details/index-practice=115-cargotram-zurich&.html. Accessed 28 Dec 2017
  21. Jabbour ABLS, Jabbour CJC, Sarkis J, Govindan K (2014) Brazil’s new national policy on solid waste: challenges and opportunities. Clean Techn Environ Policy 16:7–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu Y, Ketai H, Liu J, Xu Y (2008) Analysis of the concept of urban rail transit based city logistics system. In: Abstracts of the international conference on smart manufacturing application. IEEE, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea. pp 288–292Google Scholar
  23. Mehmann J, Frehe V, Teuteberg F (2015) Crowd logistics – a literature review and maturity model. In: Abstracts of the Hamburg international conference of logistics, Hamburg, Germany, Sept 2015Google Scholar
  24. Mervis J (2014) The information highway gets physical: the Physical Internet would move goods the way its name sake moves data. Science 344:1057–1196Google Scholar
  25. Montreil B (2011) Towards a Physical Internet: meeting the global logistics sustainability grand challenge. Interuniversity Research Centre on Enterprise Networks, Logistics and TransportationGoogle Scholar
  26. Neuhold G (2005) Cargo Tram Zurich - The environmental savings of using other modes. http://www.bestufs.net/conferences/2005-06-23_amsterdam.html. Accessed 30 Apr 2018
  27. Pumpinyo S, Nitivattananon V (2014) Investigation of Barriers and Factors Affecting the Reverse Logistics of Waste Management Practice: A Case Study in Thailand. Sustainability 6:7048–7062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rai HB, Verlinde S, Merckx J, Macharis C (2017) Crowd logistics: an opportunity for more sustainable urban freight transport? Eur Transp Res Rev 9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-017-0256-6
  29. Regué R, Bristow AL (2013) Appraising freight tram schemes: a case study of Barcelona. Eur J Transp Infrastruct Res 13:56–78Google Scholar
  30. Resor RR (2003) Catalog of ‘common use’ rail corridors. Publication DOT/FRA/ORD-03-16 US Department of Transportation, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  31. Ripanti EF, Tjahojono B, Fan I (2015) Circular economy in reverse logistics: Relationships and potential applications in product remanufacturing. In: Abstracts of the 20th logistics research network (LRN) conference, Derby, UK, Sep 2015Google Scholar
  32. Sampaio A, Savelsbergh M, Veelenturf L, van Woensel T (2017) Crowd-based city logistics. Optimization online. Available via http://www.optimization-online.org/DB_FILE/2017/11/6346.pdf Accessed 28 Dec 2017
  33. Silva DAL, Renó GWS, Sevegnani G, Sevegnani TB, Truzzi OMS (2013) Comparison of disposable and returnable packaging a case study of reverse logistics in Brazil. J Clean Prod 47:377–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sivakumaran K, Lu XY, Hanson M (2010) Use of passenger rail infrastructure for goods movement: Economic feasibility study from the California’s San Francisco Bay area. Transp Res Rec 2162:44–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Soleimani H, Kannan G (2015) A hybrid particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm for closed-loop supply chain network design in large-scale networks. Appl Math Model 39:3990–4012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Srivastava SK, Srivastava RK (2006) Managing product returns for reverse logistics. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 36:524–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thierry M, Salomon MJN, van Nunen J, van Wassenhove L (1995) Strategic issues in product recovery management. California Management Review 27:114–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thürer M, Pan YH, Qu T Luo H, Li CD, Huang GQ (2016) Internet of Things (IoT) driven kanban system for reverse logistics: solid waste collection. J Intell Manuf.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1278-y
  39. Tonanont A (2009) Performance evaluation in reverse logistics with data envelopment analysis. Dissertation, University of Texas at ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  40. Verdonck L, Caris A, Ramaekers K, Janssens GK (2013) Collaborative logistics from the perspective of road transportation companies. Transp Rev 33:700–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana Pires
    • 1
  • Graça Martinho
    • 1
  • Susana Rodrigues
    • 1
  • Maria Isabel Gomes
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Sciences and TechnologyUniversidade NOVA de Lisboa (FCT NOVA)CaparicaPortugal

Personalised recommendations