Advertisement

Assessment and Improvement

  • Ana Pires
  • Graça Martinho
  • Susana Rodrigues
  • Maria Isabel Gomes
Chapter

Abstract

Today’s environmental concerns are related to the population and its consumption of resources, which have led to significant ecological global changes, such as climate change and resources overexploitation. The solid waste management, in an integrated way, has been capable of influencing and contributing to the solution of such challenges. The purpose of this chapter is to discuss the assessment and improvement of the waste collection system by using life cycle thinking, with a sustainable perspective. Several methodologies such as life cycle assessment, carbon footprint, life cycle costing, and social life cycle assessment will be presented and discussed concerning its application to waste collection systems and contribution to the integrated waste management system.

Keywords

LCA Social LCA LCC Environmental impacts Public participation Behavior studies 

References

  1. Altaf A, Hughes J (1994) Measuring the demand for improving urban sanitation services: results of a CV study in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Urban Stud 31:19–30Google Scholar
  2. Ashby MF (2009) Materials and the environment: eco-informed material choice. Elsevier, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Bare JC, Norris GA, Pennington DW (2003) TRACI, the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts. J Ind Ecol 6:49–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benoît C, Norris GA, Valdivia S, Ciroth A, Moberg A, Bos U, Prakash S, Ugaya C, Beck T (2010) The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time! Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:156–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benoît-Norris C, Vickery-Niederman G, Valdivia S, Franze J, Traverso M, Ciroth A, Mazijn B (2011) Introducing the UNEP/SETAC methodological sheets for subcategories of social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:682–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernstad A, la Cour Jansen J (2012) Review of comparative LCAs of food waste management systems – current status and potential improvements. Waste Manag 32:2439–2455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Björklund A, Dalemo M, Sonesson U (1999) Evaluating a municipal solid waste management plan using ORWARE. J Clean Prod 7:271–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. British Standards Institution (BSI) (2011) PAS 2050:2011 specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. BSI, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Brogaard LK, Christensen TH (2012) Quantifying capital goods for collection and transport of waste. Waste Manag Res 30:1243–1250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bueno G, Latasa I, Lozano PJ (2015) Comparative LCA of two approaches with different emphasis on energy or material recovery for a municipal solid waste management system in Gipuzkoa. Renew Sust Energ Rev 51:449–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chang NB, Pires A (2015) Sustainable solid waste management: a systems engineering approach, IEEE book series on systems science and engineering. Wiley–IEEE Press, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  12. Chhipi-Shrestha GK, Hewage K, Sadiq R (2015) ‘Socializing’ sustainability: a critical review on current development status of social life cycle impact assessment method. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17:579–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Christensen TH, Bhander G, Lindvall H, Larsen AW, Fruergaard T, Damgaard A, Manfredi S, Boldrin A, Riber C, Hauschild M (2007) Experience with the use of LCA–modelling (EASEWASTE) in waste management. Waste Manag Res 25:257–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cifrian E, Andres A, Viguri JR (2013) Estimating monitoring indicators and the carbon footprint of municipal solid waste management in the region of Cantabria, Northern Spain. Waste Biomass Valoriz 4:271–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clavreul J, Guyonnet D, Christensen TH (2012) Quantifying uncertainty in LCA–modelling of waste management systems. Waste Manag 32:2482–2495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clavreul J, Baumeister H, Christensen TH, Damgaard A (2014) An environmental assessment system for environmental technologies. Environ Model Softw 60:18–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cleary J (2009) Life cycle assessments of municipal solid waste management systems: a comparative analysis of selected peer–reviewed literature. Environ Int 35:1256–1266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Consoli F, Allen D, Boustead I, Fava J, Franklin W, Jensen AA, de Oude N, Parrish R, Perriman R, Postlethwaite D, Quay B, Séguin J, Vigon B (eds) (1993) Guidelines for life–cycle assessment: a ‘code of practice’. SETAC, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  19. Crawford RH (2011) Life cycle assessment in the built environment. Spon Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Curley M, Salmelin B (2013) Open innovation 20 – a new paradigm. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/open-innovation-20-%E2%80%93-new-paradigm-and-foundation-sustainable-europe. Accessed 10 Mar 2018
  21. Curran MA (2006) Life cycle assessment: principles and practice. National Risk Management Research Laboratory – Office of Research and Development, USEPA, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  22. Dalemo M, Sonesson U, Björklund A, Mingarini K, Frostell B, Nybrant T, Jönsson H, Sundqvist J-O, Thyselius L (1997) ORWARE – a simulation model for organic waste handling systems. Resour Conserv Recycl 21:17–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dreyer LC, Hauschild MZ, Schierbeck J (2006) A framework for social life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:88–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dupré M, Meineri S (2016) Increasing recycling through displaying feedback and social comparative feedback. J Environ Psychol 48:101–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ecobilan (2004) WISARD – waste integrated system for analysis of recovery and disposal. EcobilanGoogle Scholar
  26. Ekvall T, Tillman AM (1997) Open–loop recycling: criteria for allocation procedures. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2:155–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ekvall T, Weidema BP (2004) System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9:161–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ekvall T, Assefa G, Björklund A, Eriksson O, Finnveden G (2007) What life–cycle assessment does and does not do in assessments of waste management. Waste Manag 27:989–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. EpE (2010) Protocol for the quantification of greenhouse gases emissions from waste management activities. http://www.epe-asso.org/en/protocol-quantification-greenhouse-gases-emissions-waste-management-activities-version-5-october-2013/. Accessed 15 Jan 2018
  30. Eriksson M, Strid I, Hansson PA (2015) Carbon footprint of food waste management options in the waste hierarchy – a Swedish case study. J Clean Prod 93:115–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. European Commission–Joint Research Centre–Institute for Environment and Sustainability (EC–JRC–IES) (2010) International reference life cycle data system (ILCD) handbook general guide for life cycle assessment – detailed guidance. European Commission–Joint Research Centre–Institute for Environment and Sustainability, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  32. European Platform on Life Cycle Assessment (EPLCA) (2007) Carbon footprint – what it is and how to measure it. European Commission, IspraGoogle Scholar
  33. Fantke PE, Huijbregts MAJ, Margni M, Hauschild MZ, Jolliet O, Mckone TE, Rosenbaum RK, van De Meent D (2015) USEtox 20 user manual (version 2). http://usetox.org. Accessed 15 Jan 2018
  34. Fava J, Dennison R, Jones B, Curran MA, Vigon B, Selke S, Barnum J (eds) (1991) A technical framework for life–cycle assessment. SETAC and SETAC Foundation for Environmental Education, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  35. Fernández-Nava Y, del Río J, Rodríguez-Iglesias J, Castrillón L, Mara E (2014) Life cycle assessment of different municipal solid waste management options: a case study of Asturias (Spain). J Clean Prod 81:178–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fontaras G, Martini G, Manfredi U, Marotta A, Krasenbrink A, Maffioletti F, Terenghi R, Colombo M (2012) Assessment of on–road emissions of four Euro V diesel and CNG waste collection trucks for supporting air–quality improvement initiatives in the city of Milan. Sci Total Environ 426:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Frischknecht R (2010) LCI modelling approaches applied on recycling of materials in view of environmental sustainability, risk perception and eco–efficiency. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:666–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Frischknecht R, Steiner R, Jungbluth N (2008) The ecological scarcity method – eco-factors 2006. Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN), BernGoogle Scholar
  39. Goedkoop M, Spriensma R (2000) The eco–indicator 99 – a damage–oriented method for life cycle impact assessment. https://www.pre-sustainability.com/download/EI99_annexe_v3.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2018
  40. Goedkoop MJ, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, De Schryver A, Struijs J, van Zelm R (2009) ReCiPe 2008, a life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonized category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level. http://www.lcia-recipenet/. Accessed 12 Nov 2012
  41. Guinée JB, Gorree M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R, van Oers L, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Suh S, Udo de Haes A, de Buijn JA, van Duin R, Huijbregts MAJ (eds) (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment: operational guide to the ISO standards. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  42. Hauschild MZ, Potting J (2005) Spatial differentiation in life cycle impacts assessment–the EDIP2003, Methodology environmental news no 80. Danish Ministry of the Environment, Environment Protection Agency, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  43. Hauschild MZ, Dreyer LC, Jørgensen A (2008) Assessing social impacts in a life cycle perspective–lessons learned. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57:21–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hosseinijou SA, Mansour S, Shirazi MA (2014) Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:620–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hunkeler D, Lichtenvort K, Rebitzer G (eds) (2008) Environmental life cycle costing. SETAC, Pensacola, FL (US) in collaboration with CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  46. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Fourth assessment report: climate change 2007 (AR4). IPCC. http://www.ipccch/publications_and_data/publications_and_data_reports-html. Accessed 10 Nov 2012
  47. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2006a) ISO 14040 environmental management – life cycle assessment: principles and framework. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  48. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2006b) ISO 14044 environmental management – life cycle assessment: requirements and guidelines. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  49. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2013) ISO/TS 14067 carbon footprint of products–requirements and guidelines for quantification and communication. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  50. Iofrida N, Strano A, Gulisano G, de Luca AI (2018) Why social life cycle assessment is struggling in development? Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:201–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Iriarte A, Gabarrell X, Rieradevall J (2009) LCA of selective waste collection systems in dense urban areas. Waste Manag 29:903–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jaunich MK, Levis JW, DeCarolis JF, Gaston EV, Barlaz MA, Bartelt-Hunt SL, Jones EG, Hauser L, Jaikumar R (2016) Characterization of municipal solid waste collection operations. Resour Conserv Recycl 114:92–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jenkins RR, Martinez SA, Plamer K, Podolsky MJ (2003) The determinants of household recycling: a material–specific analysis of recycling program features and unit pricing. J Environ Econ Manag 45:294–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Jolliet O, Margni M, Charles R, Humbert S, Payet J, Rebitzer G, Rosenbaum R (2003) IMPACT 2002+: a new life cycle impact assessment methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8:324–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Keramitsoglou KM, Tsagarakis KP (2013) Public participation in designing a recycling scheme in Didimoticho, Greece. Resour Conserv Recycl 70:55–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Klöpffer W (2008) Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Klöpffer W, Grahl B (2014) Life cycle assessment (LCA): a guide to best practice. Wiley, WeinheimCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Laurent A, Clavreul J, Bernstad A, Bakas I, Niero M, Gentil E, Christensen TH, Hauschild MZ (2014) Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems – part II: methodological guidance for a better practice. Waste Manag 34:589–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Li Y, Khanal SK (2016) Bioenergy: principles and applications. Wiley Blackwell, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  60. López JM, Gómez A, Aparicio F, Sánchez FJ (2009) Comparison of GHG emissions from diesel, biodiesel and natural gas refuse trucks of the City of Madrid. Appl Energy 86:610–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Maimoun MA, Reinhart DR, Gammoh FT, Budh PM (2013) Emissions from US waste collection vehicles. Waste Manag 33:1079–1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Martinez-Sanchez V, Kromann MA, Astrup TF (2015) Life cycle costing of waste management systems: overview, calculation principles and case studies. Waste Manag 36:343–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Martinez-Sanchez V, Tonini D, Møller F, Astrup TP (2016) Life–cycle costing of food waste management in Denmark: importance of indirect effects. Environ Sci Technol 50:4513–4523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. McDougall F, White P, Franke M, Hindle P (2001) Integrated solid waste management: a life cycle inventory. Blackwell Science Ltd, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Meijer J, Kasem N, Lewis K (2017) SM transparency report™/EPD framework part A – LCA calculation rules and report requirements. http://www.sustainablemindscom/files/transparency/SM_Part_A_LCA_calculation_rules_and_report_requirements_2017pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2018
  66. Miafodzyeva S, Brandt N (2013) Recycling behaviour among householders: synthesizing determinants via a meta–analysis. Waste Biomass Valoriz 4:221–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pelletier N, Ardente F, Brandão M, de Camillis C, Pennington D (2015) Rationales for and limitations of preferred solutions for multi–functionality problems in LCA: is increased consistency possible? Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:74–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pérez J, Lumbreras J, Rodríguez E, Vedrenne M (2017) A methodology for estimating the carbon footprint of waste collection vehicles under different scenarios: application to Madrid. Transp Res Part D 52:156–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pires A, Sargedas J, Miguel M, Pina J, Martinho G (2017) A case study of packaging waste collection systems in Portugal – part II: environmental and economic analysis. Waste Manag 61:108–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Porter RC (2002) The economics of waste. Resources for the Future, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  71. Punkkinen H, Merta E, Teerioja N, Moliis K, Kuvaja E (2012) Environmental sustainability comparison of a hypothetical pneumatic waste collection system and a door–to–door system. Waste Manag 32:1775–1781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rimos S, Hoadley AFA, Brennan DJ (2014) Environmental consequence analysis for resource depletion. Process Saf Environ Prot 92:849–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rödger J-M, Kær LL, Pagoropoulos A (2018) Life cycle costing: an introduction. In: Hauschild MZ, Rosenbaum RK, Olsen SI (eds) Life cycle assessment – theory and practice. Springer, Cham, pp 373–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rose L, Hussain M, Ahmed S, Malek K, Costanzo R, Kjeang E (2013) A comparative life cycle assessment of diesel and compressed natural gas powered refuse collection vehicles in a Canadian city. Energy Policy 52:453–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rosenbaum RK, Hauschild MZ, Boulay A-M, Fantke P, Laurent A, Núñez M, Vieira M (2018) Life cycle impact assessment. In: Hauschild M, Rosenbaum RK, Olsen S (eds) Life cycle assessment: theory and practice. Springer, Cham, pp 167–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sandhu GS, Frey HF, Bartelt-Hunt S, Jones E (2014) In–use measurement of the activity, fuel use, and emissions of front–loader refuse trucks. Atmos Environ 92:557–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Science for Environment Policy (SEP) (2018) Kerbside waste–collection schemes may need optimisation, highlights Portuguese study. European Commission DG Environment News Alert Service, issue 504, 7 March 2018, edited by SCU, The University of the West of England, BristolGoogle Scholar
  78. Steen B (1999) A systematic approach to environmental priority strategies in product development (EPS). Available via Chalmers University of Technology, Technical Environmental Planning. http://www.cpmchalmersse/document/reports/99/1999_4pdf. Accessed 11 Nov 2012
  79. Sureau S, Mazijn B, Garrido SR, Achten WMJ (2018) Social life–cycle assessment frameworks: a review of criteria and indicators proposed to assess social and socioeconomic impacts. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:904–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Teerioja N, Moliis K, Kuvaja E, Ollikainen M, Punkkinen H, Merta E (2012) Pneumatic vs door–to–door waste collection systems in existing urban areas: a comparison of economic performance. Waste Manag 32:1782–1791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Tillman AM (2010) Methodology for life cycle assessment. In: Sonesson U, Berlin J, Ziegler F (eds) Environmental assessment and management in the food industry. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp 59–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. UNEP/SETAC (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. United Nations Environment Program, Paris SETAC Life Cycle Initiative United Nations Environment ProgrammeGoogle Scholar
  83. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2009) Waste reduction model (WARM). https://www.epagov/warm. Accessed 12 Jan 2018
  84. Varotto A, Spagnolli A (2017) Psychological strategies to promote household recycling: a systematic review with meta–analysis of validated field interventions. J Environ Psychol 51:168–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wang J, Zhuang H, Lin PC (2016) The environmental impact of distribution to retail channels: a case study on packaged beverages. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 43:17–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. World Resources Institute (WRI), World and Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) (2011) Product life cycle accounting and reporting standard. Word Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development, USAGoogle Scholar
  87. Yildiz-Geyhan E, Altun-Çiftçioğlu GA, Kadırgana MAN (2017) Social life cycle assessment of different packaging waste collection system. Resour Conserv Recycl 124:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zampori L, Dotelli G (2014) Design of a sustainable packaging in the food sector by applying LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:206–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana Pires
    • 1
  • Graça Martinho
    • 1
  • Susana Rodrigues
    • 1
  • Maria Isabel Gomes
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Sciences and TechnologyUniversidade NOVA de Lisboa (FCT NOVA)CaparicaPortugal

Personalised recommendations